PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9127669

Spinal morphine for caesarean section.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Taylor, J Stedmon, L Barker. 1997. Spinal morphine for caesarean section.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9127669/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Neurologic complication of labor analgesia: facts and fiction.

Regional anesthesia has become a hallmark of modern obstetric anesthesia practice and a paramount technique for labor analgesia. Neurologic complications associated with present-day labor analgesia are thought to be unusual; however, they can occasionally complicate peripartum obstetric and anesthetic management of pregnant patients. To date, no review article in obstetric literature has specifically addressed the issue of possible neurologic anesthetic complications attributed to labor analgesia. Therefore, a series of systemic literature searches (Medline) to identify the articles on neurologic complication of labor analgesia was conducted. This review article summarizes the evidence from published articles on this topic, with particular emphasis on the mechanism of neurologic injury, lidocaine-related transient neurologic symptoms, anticoagulation and vascular compromise, diagnostic evaluation, and prevention of neurologic obstetric anesthesia-related neurologic injury in pregnancy.

Analgesia, Obstetrical↗

Single-shot intrathecal sufentanil with bupivacaine in late labour--analgesic quality and obstetric outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the analgesic effect and obstetric outcome after single-shot intrathecal sufentanil with bupivacaine in late labour. STUDY DESIGN: Forty multiparous women in advanced labour were given a spinal injection of sufentanil 7.5 microg and bupivacaine 2 mg. Pain intensity was recorded by the parturient on a visual analogue scale. The quality of pain relief was also rated with a verbal score directly after delivery. Side effects, such as hypotension, pruritus, sedation, nausea and motor block were noted. Obstetric parameters were followed and recorded. Apgar score and umbilical artery pH were noted. RESULTS: Median visual analogue scores after 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 min were 1.5, 0.5, 0, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3, respectively. Seventy-seven percent of the parturients scored the analgesic quality as excellent. Six parturients had hypotension. Motor block, sedation and nausea were rare. Pruritus was seen in 85% of the cases. No ceasarean section was performed. Vacuum extraction was done in six (15%) cases. Oxytocin augmentation was needed in 26 (65%) of the parturients. Fetal heart rate disturbances following the spinal block were seen in four cases. Apgar scores were high. No neonate had Apgar < 7. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal block with sufentanil 7.5 microg in combination with bupivacaine 2 mg is a very effective pain relief in late labour. Due to its limited duration it is important to select women in rapid progress of labour, and active obstetric management is necessary. It is also very important that the obstetrician is aware of the risk of non-reassuring fetal heart rate changes after intrathecal block.

Analgesia, Obstetrical↗