PubMed · 9134808
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
I Greenwood. 1997-04-12. Palatal injection technique.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809357
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Silicon tetrachloride is a toxic, corrosive water reactive substance that is used widely in the process industries. On spillage from containment it creates liquid pools that can either boil or evaporate. The main feature of the pool behaviour is the exothermic reaction with water. There are three sources of water available for reaction: free ground water, substrate water and atmospheric moisture. Hydrogen chloride gas and ortho-silicic acid solid (or silica gel) are produced by the hydrolysis reaction. The purpose of this paper is to describe the dangers involved in cases of accidental releases of silicon tetrachloride, to report its properties, referring to toxicity data, major accidents and mitigation tests. It also describes pool behaviour using REACTPOOL [1]. Model results indicate that the pool behaviour is governed mainly by the amount of water available for reaction. Surface roughness and wind speed also have a significant effect on the results. Results are compared with those for other water reactive chemicals in Part III of this series of papers [3]. The generated cloud will initially contain silicon tetrachloride and hydrogen chloride with numerous processes taking place. Although silicon tetrachloride has been involved in many major hazard incidents, there are no experimental data relevant to the modelling requirements.
Phosphorus trichloride and oxychloride are aggressive materials, widely used in the process industries. On escape to the atmosphere they create toxic clouds that may cause serious damage to people and to the environment. When spilled onto the ground they create liquid pools that can boil, evaporate or even solidify. The main feature of the pool behaviour is the exothermic reaction of these chemicals with water, which is complicated and depends heavily on the amount of water available for reaction, and as result of which the pool has changing composition and properties. The purpose of this paper is to describe the dangers involved in cases of accidental releases of phosphorus trichloride and oxychloride, to report their properties, referring to toxicity data and major accidents. The spill behaviour of phosphorus trichloride and oxychloride has been incorporated into REACTPOOL [R.F. Kapias, C. Griffiths, J. Haz. Mater.]. Model results indicate that the pool behaviour is strongly affected by the amount of water available for reaction. Surface roughness and wind speed, also have a strong effect on the results. Although there are no experimental data for model validation, it is shown that REACTPOOL gives useful insights into the behaviour of such spills. The paper concludes with a discussion comparing the behaviour for several water reactive chemicals to which REACTPOOL has been applied.
BACKGROUND: Acute hand injury is the leading cause of occupational injury treated in United States' hospital emergency departments (e.g., laceration, crush or fracture). To identify risk factors for traumatic hand injuries, we conducted a case-crossover study of transient exposures (e.g., being rushed) for acute occupational traumatic hand injury. METHODS: The case-crossover method, which uses subjects as their own controls, was used to identify risk factors for occupational hand injury. Two hundred and thirty-two subjects were recruited from 17 occupational health clinics in New England and interviewed by telephone a median of 1.2 days after their injury. The a priori hazard period was defined as 10 min before the injury. Two control periods were used: one was 60-70 min prior to the injury (matched-pair interval analysis); the other was the total work-time exposed, on average, in the previous month (usual frequency analysis). RESULTS: In the usual frequency analysis, the relative risk for using malfunctioning or different-from-usual equipment or tools in the hazard period was 25.5 (95% confidence interval = 18.4-35.2). Relative risks were also significantly elevated for performing a task using an unusual work method, doing an unusual task, being distracted, or being rushed. Wearing gloves appeared to be protective (relative risk = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5-1.2). Matched-pair interval analysis, where appropriate, provided similar findings but had much wider confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the case-crossover design is a feasible and efficient method for studying transient risk factors for sudden-onset traumatic occupational hand injury. The usual frequency analysis proved more useful than the match-pair approach to control period selection.