PubMed · 9152148
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A B Safran. 1997. Unperceived visual field defects.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150688033
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the lymphoproliferative response (LPR) to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in two groups of AIDS patients undergoing long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): group 1 ( n = 22) with nadir CD4(+) cell count <50/microl and no HCMV disease; group 2 ( n = 16) with <50/microl CD4(+) T-cell count and HCMV disease. All patients had previously undergone antiretroviral monotherapy or dual therapy before initiating HAART. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The two groups of patients were tested prospectively for CD4(+) T cell count, HIV RNA load, HCMV viremia, and LPR to HCMV at baseline, and then after 3 and 4 years of HAART. A control group of 13 recently diagnosed treatment-naive AIDS patients with CD4(+) T-cell counts <100/microl was also investigated. RESULTS: No LPR to HCMV was found in any of the treatment-naive patients nor in any patient of the two groups examined at baseline, when HCMV viremia was 13.6% in the patient group without disease and 87.5% in the group with disease ( p <.0001). After 3 years of HAART, the frequency of patients who recovered an LPR to HCMV was not significantly different (81.8% in the group without HCMV disease, and 68.7% in the group with HCMV disease), whereas, compared with baseline, the HIV load decreased and the CD4(+) T-cell count increased significantly and to a comparable extent in the two groups of patients. In addition, the frequency of patients with HCMV viremia, although reduced, became comparable in both groups. After 4 years of HAART, the frequency of responders to HCMV without and with HCMV disease dropped to comparable levels (50.0 vs. 56.3%, respectively) in association with high median CD4(+) T-cell counts and low median HIV RNA plasma levels. In parallel, the frequency of patients with HCMV viremia did not change significantly. In addition, after between 3 and 4 years of HAART, although the frequency of stable responders and nonresponders remained unchanged (50%) in both groups, most of the remaining patients showed declining levels of responsiveness to HCMV. Although some patients from both groups were found to have CD4(+) T-cell counts >150/microl in the absence of LPR to HCMV, thus suggesting dissociation of specific and nonspecific immune reconstitution, a significant correlation was found between CD4(+) T-cell count and LPR to HCMV (r = 0.44; p <.001). From a clinical standpoint, anti-HCMV therapy could be safely discontinued in 8 patients with HCMV retinitis showing CD4(+) T-cell counts >150/microl, recovery of HCMV LPR, and no HCMV viremia. CONCLUSIONS: Declining levels of the previously recovered LPR to HCMV are often observed after long-term HAART. However, because the role of LPR in the evolution of HCMV infection and disease during HAART remains to be defined, the clinical impact of the declining LPR to HCMV must still be clarified in long-term prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rates of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis adherence to guidelines and how they have changed after introduction of effective antiretroviral therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of primary prophylaxis for MAC and PCP and to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic characteristics, region, and provider experience. DESIGN: National probability sample cohort of HIV patients in care. SETTING: One hundred sixty HIV health care providers. PATIENTS: A total of 2864 patients interviewed in 1996 to 1997 (68% response) and 2267 follow-up interviews, representing 65% of surviving sampled patients (median follow-up, 15.1 months). MEASUREMENTS: Use of prophylactic drugs, most recent CD4 count, sociodemographics, and regional and total HIV patients/providers. RESULTS: Of patients eligible for primary MAC prophylaxis (most recent CD4 count <50/mm(3) ), 41% at baseline and 40% at follow-up patients were treated. Of patients eligible for primary PCP prophylaxis (i.e., those with CD4 counts <200/mm(3) ), 64% and 72% were treated, respectively. MAC prophylaxis at baseline was less likely in African American (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.59), Hispanic (OR, 27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94) and less-educated (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.0) patients and more likely in U. S. geographic regions in the Pacific West (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.0-23) and Midwest (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2-33) and in practices with more HIV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most eligible patients did not receive MAC prophylaxis; PCP prophylaxis rates were better but still suboptimal. Our results support outreach efforts to African Americans, Hispanics, the less educated, and those in the northeastern United States and in practices with fewer HIV patients.