PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9183400

[Intestinal stenosis during ulceronecrotizing enterocolitis].

J J Baudon·P Josset·G Audry·N Benlagha·O Fresco
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal stenosis following necrotizing enterocolitis (NE) occurred both in surgically-treated neonates after perforation, distal to an enterostomy and in medically-treated patients developing symptoms of obstruction. It has been proposed to detect stenosis by contrast enema before refeeding in those medically-treated patients. The aim of this study was to compare delay, clinical and pathological characteristics of surgical and medical patients, both after occlusion and prospective contrast studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients out of 50 with NE observed from 1984 to 1994 developed one or several intestinal stenosis. Diagnosis of NE was based on usual clinical signs, X-ray pneumatosis (43 to 50) and/or perforation in 16 cases. Among these 16 surgical patients, 12 survived the initial perforation. Among the 34 medical patients, 11 were seen before 1989 and did not have contrast studies before refeeding; 23 seen after 1989 had a contrast enema before. RESULTS: One or several stenosis occurred in four out of 12 surgical patients, four out of 11 medical patients without prospective contrast studies (one of them died from sepsis) and seven out of the 23 of the prospective group. On the whole, 26 stenosis occurred in 15 neonates: ten to the right colon, five to the transverse and 11 to the left colon. One ileal stenosis followed enterostomy. Delay of stenosis development was comparable in the three groups (between 3 weeks and 3 months). Pathologic examination showed similar lesions in the three groups (fibrosis 15, edema nine to 15 and chronic inflammation 12 to 15). CONCLUSION: Among 46 neonates who survived the initial period, 15 developed stenosis, a 30% proportion similar in patients operated on for perforation or in medically-treated patients whose diagnosis was made after occlusion or after contrast enema as well. These results suggest that systematic stenosis detection by contrast enema may avoid complications and permit programmed one-stage surgery.

Explore related subjects

Constriction, PathologicEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntestinal DiseasesMalePeritonitisRisk FactorsUlcerEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Baudon, P Josset, G Audry, N Benlagha, O Fresco. 1997. [Intestinal stenosis during ulceronecrotizing enterocolitis].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-693x(97)86445-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Computed tomographic enterography adds information to clinical management in small bowel Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: CT enterography yields striking findings in the bowel wall in Crohn's disease. These images may help to evaluate whether small bowel narrowing results from active disease requiring anti-inflammatory therapy. However, the clinical relevance of these images is unknown. It is also not known if these radiologic findings correlate with objective biomarkers of inflammation. METHODS: In a blinded and independent evaluation, IBD subspecialty gastroenterologists reviewed clinical data, and CT radiologists reviewed CT enterography scans of 67 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease and suspicion of either small bowel inflammation or stricture. Comparisons were made between (1) clinical and radiologic assessments of inflammation and stricture, (2) clinical assessments before and after computed tomographic enterography (CTE) reports were revealed, and (3) radiologic findings and objective biomarkers of inflammation. RESULTS: (1) Individual CTE findings correlated poorly (Spearman's rho < 0.30) with clinical assessment; (2) clinicians did not suspect 16% of radiologic strictures, and more than half the cases of clinically suspected strictures did not have them on CTE; (3) CTE data changed clinicians' perceptions of the likelihood of steroid benefit in 41 of 67 cases; (4) specific CTE findings correlated with CRP, and a distinct set of CTE findings correlated with ESR in the subset of patients who had these biomarkers measured. CONCLUSIONS: CTE seems to add unique information to clinical assessment, both in detecting additional strictures and in changing clinicians' perceptions of the likelihood of steroids benefiting patients. The biomarker correlations suggest that CTE is measuring real biologic phenomena that correlate with inflammation, providing information distinct from that in a standard clinical assessment.

Constriction, Pathologic↗
PubMed2007

Optimization of spatial resolution for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine optimum spatial resolution when imaging peripheral arteries with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight vessel diameters ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 mm were simulated in a vascular phantom. A total of 40 three-dimensional flash MRA sequences were acquired with incremental variations of fields of view, matrix size, and slice thickness. The accurately known eight diameters were combined pairwise to generate 22 "exact" degrees of stenosis ranging from 42% to 87%. Then, the diameters were measured in the MRA images by three independent observers and with quantitative angiography (QA) software and used to compute the degrees of stenosis corresponding to the 22 "exact" ones. The accuracy and reproducibility of vessel diameter measurements and stenosis calculations were assessed for vessel size ranging from 6 to 8 mm (iliac artery), 4 to 5 mm (femoro-popliteal arteries), and 1 to 3 mm (infrapopliteal arteries). Maximum pixel dimension and slice thickness to obtain a mean error in stenosis evaluation of less than 10% were determined by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean errors on stenosis quantification were 8.8% +/- 6.3% for 6- to 8-mm vessels, 15.5% +/- 8.2% for 4- to 5-mm vessels, and 18.9% +/- 7.5% for 1- to 3-mm vessels. Mean errors on stenosis calculation were 12.3% +/- 8.2% for observers and 11.4% +/- 15.1% for QA software (P = .0342). To evaluate stenosis with a mean error of less than 10%, maximum pixel surface, the pixel size in the phase direction, and the slice thickness should be less than 1.56 mm2, 1.34 mm, 1.70 mm, respectively (voxel size 2.65 mm3) for 6- to 8-mm vessels; 1.31 mm2, 1.10 mm, 1.34 mm (voxel size 1.76 mm3), for 4- to 5-mm vessels; and 1.17 mm2, 0.90 mm, 0.9 mm (voxel size 1.05 mm3) for 1- to 3-mm vessels. CONCLUSION: Higher spatial resolution than currently used should be selected for imaging peripheral vessels.

Constriction, Pathologic↗