PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9193171

Dramatic play: a format for 'literate' language?

L Vedeler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research literature discussing the possibility of a relationship between dramatic play and literacy development in school beginners has evoked interest in the context of the formalisation of early years curriculum, particularly relationships between oral syntactic competence in preschool children and later reading ability. AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible differences in syntax between sociodramatic play and other play activities in small play groups. It was predicted that the language in sociodramatic play would be more 'literate', i.e., more decontextualised, explicit and linguistically elaborated. The hypothesis tested was that sociodramatic play elicits more advanced syntactic language in children. SAMPLES: Six children (six-year-olds) in groups of three girls and three boys were observed in 11 free play episodes (five sociodramatic play episodes and six other group play episodes). Approximately 100 utterances from each child in each play category were analysed. The children had normal intelligence and language ability, and had a middle class background. METHODS: The play groups were observed during indoor free play in a playroom equipped for family play and with different toys. No instructions were given. The observations were video- and audiotaped and the children's utterances transcribed and analysed syntactically, i.e., utterance types (complexity and completeness), sentence adverbials and expansions. Chi-square was used to test for statistically significant differences in children's use of syntax. RESULTS: The children's language turned out to be significantly more advanced and 'literate' with more syntactically complete and complicated utterances, use of explicit references and elaborated nominal groups in sociodramatic play than in any other play activity. CONCLUSIONS: The demands of conveying meaning to peers in dramatic play contexts seem to provide children with opportunities to practise 'literate' language, language that is similar to what is demanded when writing for an absent audience.

Explore related subjects

Chi-Square DistributionChildChild BehaviorCommunicationFemaleHumansLanguage DevelopmentMaleObservationPlay and PlaythingsVideo RecordingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Vedeler. 1997. Dramatic play: a format for 'literate' language?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01234.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1998

Assessing screening tests: extensions of McNemar's test.

We address the problem of comparing a new screening test to a currently available screening test in the absence of a gold standard. When both tests are given to each participant in a clinical trial, the usual analytical approach is to apply McNemar's test for equality of the off-diagonal probabilities, with rejection of the null hypothesis implying that the tests differ. For assessing equivalence, however, we consider a compound null hypothesis that the new test gives either fewer or more positive results than the standard. If both parts of this hypothesis are rejected, we assert equivalence in the rate of positive responses. We propose an extension of McNemar's test for this situation. A companion step is to construct a confidence interval for the ratio of the marginal probabilities and assert equivalence if the interval is sufficiently small. It is also important that the tests agree a large proportion of the time. This can be verified with a complementary two-tailed binomial test. Another situation arises when there is a gold standard for disease diagnosis, and we wish to compare the sensitivity and specificity of two screening tests. We show that a 2 degrees-of-freedom chi-square test based on two McNemar-like tables is an appropriate test.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed1998

Coronary angiography from the radial artery--experience, complications and limitations.

AIMS: to assess the outcomes, complications and limitations of coronary angiography performed via percutaneous radial artery puncture. METHODS AND RESULTS: two hundred and fifty patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography from the radial artery, 182 (72.8%) of whom had contraindications to the femoral approach, for example due to peripheral vascular disease (n=85), therapeutic anticoagulation (29), or failed femoral approach (17). Procedural success in this high-risk population was achieved in 231 patients (92.4%). Principle reasons for failure were unsuccessful radial access (5) and arterial spasm (5). Procedure duration (SD) for an operator's first 20 cases compared with cases thereafter (min) was 47.7 (16.7) vs. 41.5 (14.6), P=0.0004; fluoroscopy time (min) 9.7 (7.1) vs. 6.6 (5.1), P=0.0001 and procedural success 89.6% vs. 94.1%, P=ns. Complications included two deaths associated temporally with catheterisation, three cases of arterial dissection without ischaemic sequelae and one transient ischaemic attack. CONCLUSIONS: coronary angiography can be performed successfully from the radial artery, but this approach has limitations, which include the need to demonstrate dual palmar vascular supply, the prolonged learning phase, the procedural failure rate, patient discomfort and a demonstrable incidence of vascular and haemodynamic complications. We believe that radial coronary angiography should only be undertaken when there is a contraindication to the femoral approach.

Chi-Square Distribution↗