PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9200084

The cecostomy button.

Abstract

Percutaneous insertion of a cecostomy tube, performed under local anesthesia, to facilitate antegrade colonic cleansing, has been an invaluable advance in the management of fecal incontinence. However, the patient is left with a length of tubing (2 to 4 inches) protruding from the cecostomy site that has to be taped down to the abdominal wall. Available devices for insertion in place of the cecostomy tube are cumbersome and have a relatively high profile, projecting more than 1 cm from the surface of the abdominal wall. Worn under a swimsuit, they are clearly discernible. The inflated balloon within the cecum can occasionally break. Furthermore, in the individual with a relatively thick abdominal wall, such devices are too short to reach from the skin to the cecum. A new form of low-profile trapdoor device has been developed that overcomes the above shortcomings of other available "buttons." It has been successfully used in a clinical setting in 49 patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P G Chait, B Shandling, H F Richards. 1997. The cecostomy button.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90634-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Break of radial artery catheter resulting in a loose intra-arterial fragment].

An unusual complication after radial artery cannulation is described. Due to difficult fixation the distal part of the catheter broke loose, and was captured intravascularly. This complication has only been reported once before. The present case did not lead to surgical intervention. A suggestion is made as to, how to avoid this complication.

Catheters, Indwelling↗

[The evaluation of unnecessary venous access ports in an emergency service].

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence of unnecessary cannulations of peripheral veins in an emergency department (ED). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a sample of 1,113 patients from a total of 24,637 who were attended at ED. We reviewed the cannulations of peripheral veins and if they was used or not. RESULTS: In 202 (18.5%) cases, venous access was obtained. In 84 (41.6%) the venous access was not used. CONCLUSION: The unnecessary use of venous cannulations is a common practice and generates a substantial added cost of poor quality.

Catheters, Indwelling↗