PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9215794

Three dimensional variability in patient positioning using bite block immobilization in 3D-conformal radiation treatment for ENT-tumors.

J Willner·U Hädinger·M Neumann·F J Schwab·K Bratengeier·M Flentje
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the three-dimensional (3D) reproducibility of the isocenter position and of patient positioning with the use of bite block immobilization by means of a simple verification procedure for a complex beam arrangement applied for ENT-tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the positioning data of 29 consecutive patients treated for ENT-tumors at the Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the University of Wurzburg. A total of 136 treatment sessions were analyzed. Patients were positioned and immobilized using an individualized bite block system and a head and neck support. A complex beam arrangement was applied combining two offset rotational and two oblique wedge fields on a 5 MV linear accelerator. Orthogonal verification films were taken once weekly. Four to six film pairs per patient were obtained (during 4-6 weeks) with a mean number of 4.7 film pairs per patient. These were compared to the corresponding orthogonal simulator films taken during primary simulation. Deviations of the verified isocenter from the isocenter on the simulator film were measured and analyzed in three dimensions in terms of overall, systematic and random categories. A 3D-deviation vector was calculated from these 3D data as well as a 2D-deviation vector (for comparison with literature data) from the lateral verification films. RESULTS: The overall setup deviation showed standard deviations (SD) of 2.5, 2.7 and 3.1 mm along the cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior and medio-lateral axes, respectively. The random component ranged from SD 1.9 to 2.1 mm and the systematic component ranged from SD 1.8 to 2.2 mm. The mean length of the 3D-vector was 3.1 mm for the systematic as well as the random component. Ninety percent of 3D systematic and random deviations were less than 5 mm. The mean length of the 2D-vector was 2.4 mm for the random component and 2.2 mm for the systematic component. Ninety percent of 2D-random and systematic variations were less than 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The presented individualized bite block immobilization device provides an accurate and reproducible patient positioning for 3D-conformal radiation therapy in the head and neck. Random and systematic deviations in each of the three directions are in the range of +/-4 mm (2 SD, comprising 95% of the deviations) and are within the range or even less than deviations described for most thermoplastic or PVC-mask fixation devices. These deviations should be taken into account during definition of planning target volume in head and neck tumors.

Explore related subjects

Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmobilizationMaleProspective StudiesRadiation ProtectionRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsClinical TrialJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Willner, U Hädinger, M Neumann, F J Schwab, K Bratengeier, M Flentje. 1997. Three dimensional variability in patient positioning using bite block immobilization in 3D-conformal radiation treatment for ENT-tumors.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(97)00055-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Novel correction methods as alternatives for the six-dimensional correction in CyberKnife treatment.

PURPOSE: During CyberKnife treatment, the 6D correction method is used to correct patient positional errors, including rotational ones. We developed novel correction methods for translating rotational errors into 3D, with the aim of making their correction safer than with 6D correction and as accurate as possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: These novel correction methods were named the gravity correction and the beam correction method. With the gravity correction method, the beam coordinates after rotation are corrected to match the tumor gravity point with 3D translational components translated by the affine transformation matrix. For beam correction, the beam coordinates are corrected to match the translated tumor target coordinates for each treatment beam. The effectiveness and impact of these methods were demonstrated by means of dose volume histogram (DVH) shift evaluation. For analysis of the treatment data of 10 patients, the treatment beam was rotated in three patterns of rotational degree and corrected with the two methods. The amount of tumor gravity point shift in the rotation was also calculated, and the deterioration of the tumor DVH was studied. RESULTS: In the case of +/-1 degrees , +/-3 degrees , and +/-1 degrees rotation for the X, Y, Z axes, the tumor gravity point of all 10 patients moved around 2.4 mm on average. Tumor DVH was deteriorated worse as the distance between the tumor gravity point and the rotational origin became more distant. With the planned D90, which represents the dose above which 90% of the tumor volume is irradiated set at 100%, the postrotational average D90 dose deteriorated to 96.12% after (+/-1 degrees , +/-3 degrees , and +/-1 degrees ) rotation. The dose was improved to 99.9% (SD +/- 0.41) after the gravity correction, or to 99.87% (SD +/- 0.55) after the beam correction. CONCLUSION: The correction methods developed by us can correct tumor DVH findings to the same degree as with 6D correction and are safer because the movement required for correcting the linac is not rotational but translational only.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗
PubMed2007

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), an advent of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), has excited the profession of radiation oncology more than any other new invention since the introduction of the linear accelerator. Approximately 1000 articles have been published on this topic to date, more than 200 of which focus on head and neck cancer. IMRT is based on computer-optimized treatment planning and a computer-controlled treatment delivery system. The computer-driven technology generates dose distributions that sharply conform to the tumor target while minimizing the dose delivered to the surrounding normal tissues. The high dose volume that tailors to the 3D configuration of the tumor along with the ability to spare the nearby normal tissues allows the option of tumor dose escalation. The head and neck region is an ideal target for this new technology for several reasons. First, IMRT offers the potential for improved tumor control through delivery of high doses to the target volume. Second, because of sharp dose gradients, IMRT results in the relative sparing of normal structures, such as the parotid glands, in the head and neck region. Third, organ motion is virtually absent in the head and neck region so, with proper immobilization, treatment can be accurately delivered. Although this is a relatively new technology, single-institution retrospective studies show better dosimetric profiles compared with conventional radiation techniques, as well as excellent clinical results. Salivary gland sparing using IMRT has also resulted in reduced incidence and severity of xerostomia, and this has been tested in a randomized trial against conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal cancer. The results do confirm that IMRT does decrease xerostomia compared with conventional radiotherapy.

Head and Neck Neoplasms↗