PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9226046

Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis.

Abstract

During the past 25 years since the 'discovery' of the ABR, clinicians world-wide have exploited the clinical utility of this evoked response with many different populations. The 1970s and 1980s saw the development of ABR protocols for increasing the reliability and validity of the response in various clinical situations. Now, in the last decade of the century, advanced technology and the development of increasingly sophisticated software allows more flexibility in these measurements. Thus, ABR testing continues to evolve at a rapid pace. The main focus for ABR in the 1990s has been on developing techniques to improve the quality of the response, decrease the time in which it takes to record the response, and minimize human error through objective response analysis. Some of the major recent developments were reviewed in this chapter. The intent of this review is to provide the researcher and the clinician with an understanding of the underlying principles of the techniques which will be, and are already, available to them on their ABR equipment. Many of these techniques are promising for use with newborns, children, and difficult-to-test populations where time is a limiting factor in the amount of information that can be obtained. We encourage any and all clinicians to experiment with these techniques to determine how each technique might contribute to their particular clinic protocols. As with any new technique, there will be a learning curve associated with understanding the underlying principles, mastering the technical requirements, and realizing the most valuable clinical applications of these methods. Once the procedures become familiar to clinicians and applied in varied clinical settings, it is likely that the neurodiagnostic and audiologic value of ABR will be profoundly enhanced.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W Hall, K A Rupp. 1997. Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000059038

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Auditory arousal thresholds are higher when infants sleep in the prone position.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possibility that infants sleeping in the prone position have higher arousal thresholds to auditory challenges than when sleeping in the supine position. STUDY DESIGN: Polygraphic recordings were performed for 1 night in 25 healthy infants with a median age of 9 weeks. The infants were exposed to white noises of increasing intensities while sleeping successively in the prone and supine positions, or vice versa. Arousal thresholds were defined by the auditory stimuli needed to induce polygraphic arousals. RESULTS: Three infants were excluded from the study because they awoke while their position was being changed. For the 22 infants included in the analysis, more intense auditory stimuli were needed to arouse the infants in the prone position than those in the supine body position (p = 0.011). Arousal thresholds were higher in the prone than in the supine position in 15 infants; unchanged in 4 infants; and lower in the prone position in 3 infants (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Infants show higher arousal thresholds to auditory challenges when sleeping in the prone position than when sleeping in the supine position. The finding could be relevant to mechanisms concerned with the reported association between sudden deaths and the prone sleeping position in infants.

Auditory Threshold

Aetiology of deafness among children at the Buguruni School for the Deaf in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

To identify the causes of deafness, 354 pupils attending the Buguruni School for the Deaf in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, were studied. Of these children 205 were boys and 149 were girls, a sex ratio of 1.4:1. The onset of deafness was congenital in 36 (10.2%) and acquired in 318 (89.8%). Among the children with acquired deafness, the cause was unknown in 77 (24.2%); meningitis in 76 (23.9%), ototoxicity in 66 (20.8%), mumps in 53 (16.7%) febrile convulsions in five (1.5%), otitis media in 28 (8.8%) and measles in 13 (4.1%). Among the children with congenital deafness, only ten (27.8%) were identified before the age of 2 years. The findings indicate that most (75.8%) of the causes of acquired deafness are preventable through immunisation, early diagnosis and proper treatment of ear infections and avoidance of prescription of ototoxic drugs. This emphasizes the need for programmes aimed at improving the health services at primary levels of health care which will in turn prevent deafness.

Auditory Threshold