PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9265315

[Homeopathy--time for official authorization?].

Abstract

The Norwegian government has recently appointed a committee to scrutinise alternative therapies and distinguish between serious and nonserious practitioners in preparation for future authorisation. Homoeopathy seems to be the most popular of alternative therapies in Norway, and counts Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland among contented patients. For this reason we have taken a closer look at the principles of homoeopathy, and the documentation. Just as in a recent report on documentation and the effect of selected alternative therapies, we too were unable to find studies of reasonable quality that were confirmed by others. Homoeopathists use theoretical physics to explain how water "remembers" the information from molecules no longer existing in the solution, when the liquid is shaken in a special way between every dilution. It does not matter whether the homoeopathist is serious or not as long as the remedy consists only of pure water. We conclude, therefore, that homoeopathy should not be authorised as a serious medical treatment in the Norwegian Health Service.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F C Størmer, O Scheel, G Anestad. 1997-06-30. [Homeopathy--time for official authorization?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9265315/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗