PubMed · 9293741
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1997. Probing the future.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9293741/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: In the Netherlands, dental implants have been included in the National Dental Insurance Scheme (NDIS) since 1989. Nowadays, out-of-pocket expenditure is low, making implant treatment financially feasible for a large group of edentulous, potential implant candidates. Treatment can be performed by both oral surgeons and general dentists. Results of implant treatment in the literature are usually obtained in academic and specialized centers. In contrast to this, the present study evaluates the quantitative and qualitative aspects of rehabilitation with oral implants in combination with an overdenture when applied on a nationwide scale. METHODS: For this purpose all patients (n = 5410) treated between January 1989 and July 1992 were extensively documented pre-operatively, implant patients (n = 429) were clinically investigated by two independent observers and the effect of treatment on denture complaints was assessed by means of a questionnaire (n = 460). RESULTS: Only a small proportion of the potential pool of implant candidates is actually being treated, to a constant number of approximately 2000 patients a year. The selected patients have major denture problems and have received relatively high levels of prosthetic care during the last decade. Clinical results are comparable to those reported in the literature, implant survival after 3 years for the lower jaw being 96.3% and for the upper jaw 70.4%. Oral hygiene was frequently considered suboptimal and seen in conjunction with marginal inflammation of the peri-implant mucosa. Subjective results were excellent, patients were quite satisfied with the improvements in the comfort and esthetics of their lower denture. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-overdenture treatment, within the guidelines and regulations set by the Dutch NDIS, is a safe and effective treatment alternative, in particular for the rehabilitation of the lower jaw.
The objective assessment of esthetic impairment and relative psychosocial handicap for unacceptable dental aspect (useful for characterizing the need of treatment), could be satisfied by an index that measures each individual's occlusal trait and the psychological impact of the same. An index with these characteristics was suggested by Cons and Jenny, already since 1985. This is an index (DAI: Dental Aesthetic Index) designed specifically to measure dental esthetics, based on esthetic standards socially defined and focused through an extensive and finalized search. Therefore this index assesses the social acceptability of the dental appearance based on the public perception of dental esthetics. The authors, in this work, indicate as measuring the objective traits of occlusion and arriving to final score trough simple calculation. This score provides severity levels of esthetic, psychologic and functional impairment relative to dental aspect in examination.
The study of medical evacuation records from offshore installation workers indicates that dental pathology is a significant problem. Dental evacuations (dentivacs) account for the highest single category of medical evacuation (medivacs). Dentivacs result in human suffering and are the cause of many lost man hours for the major oil operators in the United Kingdom. This paper reviews the reporting of dentivacs at Shell Expro over a seven year period and makes some suggestions for the way forward in the handling of offshore dental problems.