PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9297952

A final cementation technique.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Kuhl. 1997. A final cementation technique.. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Orthodontic auxiliaries--a pilot project.

AIM: To undertake a pilot study to determine a possible training programme for orthodontic auxiliaries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Trainee hygienists who had been accepted onto a 2-year programme were asked to attend the Bristol Dental School well before their course was due to begin in order to participate in a pilot orthodontic assistant auxiliary training programme. METHODS: A modular course of one month's duration was constructed based on the programme at the University of British Columbia. This aimed to teach skills such as impression taking, bond placement, debracketing, band cementation as well as core knowledge relevant to these procedures. RESULTS: At the end of the course all participants were judged to be performing the tasks they had been taught competently and safely. CONCLUSION: UK dental nurses can be trained to fill the role of an orthodontic auxiliary. It would appear that an introductory clinical skills course of one week followed by an orthodontic skills training of three weeks is sufficient for a qualified dental nurse of above average abilities such as typifies those who are currently applying for places on UK dental hygiene courses. It is estimated that a further period of nine months supervised training will be necessary for those who have successfully completed such a training to develop clinically useful speeds when delivering these skills.

Cementation

Rigidity and retention of root canal posts.

OBJECTIVE: To test the rigidity and the retention into roots of parallel root canal posts, one a spiral vented titanium post and the other a spiral serrated, hollow, stainless steel post. A serrated, stainless steel post was used as the control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-point bending test was used to test rigidity. To test retention, ten posts of each type were cemented into the roots of extracted teeth with a resin cement and the tensile loads required to remove them were compared using Student's t and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The serrated stainless steel posts were significantly more rigid than either of the other types. The titanium posts and the stainless steel hollow posts were not significantly different in rigidity. The serrated, stainless steel posts were significantly better retained than either of the other types. The titanium posts showed greater retention than the hollow posts. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the study the stainless steel, serrated posts were superior to the two newer types in terms of rigidity and retention into roots.

Cementation