PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9332149

Why all-ceramic crowns?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J Christensen. 1997. Why all-ceramic crowns?. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0068

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Trauma management in ancient Greece: value of surgical principles through the years.

This article surveys in an interdisciplinary fashion the evolution of ancient Greek medicine and traumatology in particular. In sounding out the key methods and themes of Greek medicine, we cite a range of medical treatises and correlate them to the rich evidence of ancient Greek art (iconography), which often is explicit in its depiction of the management of disease and of trauma in particular. The article begins its survey from Homer, our first source of medical information, and highlights the pioneering work of Hippocrates and the secularized professional guild of the "sons of Aesclepius."

Ceramics↗

Investigation of pyrochlore-based U-bearing ceramic nuclear waste: uranium leaching test and TEM observation.

A durable titanate ceramic waste form (Synroc) with pyrochlore (Ca(U,Pu)Ti2O7) and zirconolite (CaZrTi2O7) as major crystalline phases has been considered to be a candidate for immobilizing various high-level wastes containing fissile elements (239Pu and 235U). Transmission electron microscopy study of a sintered ceramic with stoichiometry of Ca(U(0.5)Ce(0.25)Hf(0.25))Ti2O7 shows the material contains both pyrochlore and zirconolite phases and structural intergrowth of zirconolite lamellae within pyrochlore. The (001) plane of zirconolite is parallel to the (111) plane of pyrochlore because of their structural similarities. The pyrochlore is relatively rich in U, Ce, and Ca with respect to the coexisting zirconolite. Average compositions for the coexisting pyrochlore and zirconolite at 1350 degrees C are Ca(1.01)(Ce3+(0.13)Ce4+(0.19)U(0.52)Hf(0.18))(Ti(1.95)Hf(0.05))O7 (with U/(U + Hf) = 0.72) and (Ca(0.91)Ce(0.09))(Ce3+(0.08)U(0.26)Hf(0.66)Ti(0.01))Ti(2.00)O7 (with U/(U + Hf) = 0.28), respectively. A single pyrochlore (Ca(U,Hf)Ti2O7) phase may be synthesized at 1350 degrees C if the ratio of U/(U + Hf) is greater than 0.72, and a single zirconolite (Ca(Hf,U)Ti2O7) phase may be synthesized at 1350 degrees C if the ratio of U/(U + Hf) is less than 0.28. The synthesized products were used for dissolution tests. The single-pass flow-through dissolution tests show that the dissolution of the U-bearing pyrochlore is incongruent. All the elements are released at differing rates. The dissolution data also show a decrease in rate with run time. The results indicate that a diffusion-controlled process may play a key role during the release of U. TEM observation of the leached pyrochlore directly proves that an amorphous leached layer that is rich in Ti and Hf formed on the surface after the ceramic was leached in pH 4 buffered solution for 835 days. The thickness of the layer ranges from 6 to 10 nm. A nanocrystalline TiO2 phase also forms in the leached layer. The U leaching rate (g/(m2 day)) in acidic solutions can be expressed as log(NR) = -5.36-0.20 pH, where NR is the normalized rate. Conservative leaching rates of uranium [log(NR)] for the U-bearing ceramic at pH 2 and pH 4 solutions are -5.76 and -6.16 g/(m2 day), respectively. The results show that the U release rate of the ceramic waste is 10 times slower than that of defense high-level waste glass and about 1000 times slower than that of spent fuel. The pyrochlore-based ceramic is an ideal waste form for immobilizing long-lived radionuclides of 239Pu and 235U due to the Ti- and Hf-rich leached layer that forms on the ceramic surface. The leached layer functions as a protective layer and therefore reduces the leaching rate as thickness of the leached layer increases.

Ceramics↗

Effect of post-processing heat treatment on the fracture strength of a heat-pressed dental ceramic.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of post-processing heat treatment on the fracture strength of a heat-pressed lithium disilicate dental ceramic (OPC 3G). Bar-shaped wax patterns (2 x 4 x 22 mm; n = 60) were invested and heat pressed in an automated pressing machine according to manufacturer's recommendations. The bars were polished to 1200 grit and annealed at 600 degrees C for 1 h. Two groups were left untreated as controls, one of which was Vickers indented in oil prior to testing in three-point bending. Two groups were indented and then heat treated at either 800 or 825 degrees C for 30 min. The corresponding control groups were heat treated, then indented prior to testing. Optical micrographs of the indentations were taken before and after heat treatment under differential interference contrast. The fracture toughness and/or fracture strength of the specimens was determined by the indentation-strength technique in three-point bending. Indentation-generated cracks were not discernible by optical microscopy after heat treatment at either 800 or 825 degrees C for 30 min, even under 1000 x magnification. ANOVA and Tukey's test showed that heat treatment in air at 825 degrees C for 30 min significantly increased the fracture strength of a heat-pressable lithium disilicate ceramic. This result was attributed to healing of the flaws present in the material.

Ceramics↗