PubMed · 9346754
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T K Li. 1997. Research direction.. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.500030316
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
To determine when a glucose-repressed alcohol dehydrogenase isozyme and its regulatory gene, ADR1, arose during evolution, we surveyed species of the genus Saccharomyces for glucose-repressed ADH isozymes and for ADR1 homologues. Glucose-repressed ADH isozymes were present in all species of Saccharomyces sensu strictu and also in Saccharomyces kluyveri, the most distant member of the Saccharomyces clade. We cloned and characterized ADH promoters from S. bayanus, S. douglasii, and S. kluyveri. The ADH promoters from S. bayanus and S. douglasii had conserved sequences, including upstream regulatory elements, and an extended polydA tract. The expression of a reporter gene driven by the S. bayanus promoter was glucose-repressed and dependent on the major activator of transcription, ADR1, when it was introduced into S. cerevisiae. One S. kluyveri promoter was also glucose-repressed and ADR1-dependent in S. cerevisiae. The other S. kluyveri ADH promoter was expressed constitutively and was ADR1-independent. Although showing little sequence conservation with the S. cerevisiae ADH2 promoter, the glucose-repressed S. kluyveri promoter contains numerous potential binding sites for Adr1. The glucose-repressed ADH from S. kluyveri is a mitochondrial isozyme most closely related to S. cerevisiae ADHIII. ADR1 homologues from S. douglasii and S. paradoxus contain a trinucleotide repeat encoding polyAsn that is lacking in S. cerevisiae and S. bayanus. No ADR1 homologue could be detected in S. kluyveri, suggesting that the potential for Adr1 regulation may have arisen first, before ADR1 evolved.
Glucose depletion derepresses the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene; this metabolic change is accompanied by chromatin structural modifications in the promoter region. We show that the ADR6/SWI1 gene is not necessary for derepression of the wild type chromosomal ADH2, whereas the transcription factor Adr1p, which regulates several S. cerevisiae functions, plays a major role in driving nucleosome reconfiguration and ADH2 expression. When we tested the effect of individual domains of the regulatory protein Adr1p on the chromatin structure of ADH2, a remodeling consisting of at least two steps was observed. Adr1p derivatives were analyzed in derepressing conditions, showing that the Adr1p DNA binding domain alone causes an alteration in chromatin organization in the absence of transcription. This alteration differs from the remodeling observed in the presence of the Adr1p activation domain when the promoter is transcriptionally active.
Moderate pressure accelerates hydride transfer catalyzed by yeast alcohol dehydrogenase, indicative of a large negative volume of activation [Cho and Northrop (1999) Biochemistry 38, 7470-7475]. A comparison of the effects of pressure on the oxidation of normal versus dideuteriobenzyl alcohol generates a monophasic decrease in the intrinsic isotope effect; therefore, the volume of activation for the transition-state of deuteride transfer must be even more negative, by 10.4 mL/mol. This finding appears consistent with hydrogen tunneling previously proposed for this dehydrogenase [Cha, Y., Murray, C. J., and Klinman, J. P. (1989) Science 243, 1325-1330]. However, a global fit of the primary data shows that the entire isotope effect arises from a transition-state phenomenon, unlike normal isotope effects, which arise from different vibrational frequencies in reactant states, and tunneling isotope effects, which arise from a mixture of both states. Assuming the phenomenon is tunneling, the isotopic data are consistent with a Bell tunneling correction factor of Q(H) = 12 and an imaginary frequency of nu(H) = 1220 cm(-1), the first so calculated from experimental enzymatic data. This excessively large correction factor and the large difference in the isotopic activation volumes, plus the low isotope effects at extrapolated pressures, challenge traditional applications of physical organic chemistry and transition-state theory to enzymatic catalysis. They suggest instead that something other than transition-state stabilization or tunneling is responsible for the rate acceleration, something unique to the enzymatic transition state that does not occur in nonenzymatic reactions. Arguments for the vibrational model of coupled atomic motions and the fluctuating enzyme model of protein domain motion are put forward as possible interpretations.