PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9358921

An ergonomic education and evaluation program for apprentice carpenters.

Abstract

Eighteen new apprentice carpenters received sixteen hours of ergonomics awareness education as a part of their regular apprenticeship training during 1994 and 1995. An equal number of apprentices received no training but served as controls. The training took place in the Southwest Ohio District Council of Carpenter's Joint Apprenticeship and Training School. The curriculum was designed to be "learner-centered." Instruction included short lectures presented by a journeyman carpenter and emphasized participatory activities in the school's carpentry shop. Ongoing program evaluation assessed trainees' reactions to the content and structure of the curriculum and its influence on their behavior. Trainees and controls completed brief quizzes on ergonomic knowledge. Hands-on exercises enabled trainees to apply recently acquired ergonomic knowledge in the school's carpentry shop. Trainees scored significantly higher on one-half of the post-session quizzes and the comprehensive test. Trainees preferred participatory teaching methods, especially those using redesigned tools (93%) and evaluating ergonomic risks (86%); and they supported continued safety and health education during apprentice training. The authors conclude that apprentice-ship programs should provide regular "learner-centered" occupational safety and health education that includes ergonomics, and these programs should be integrated with their shop-based manual arts instruction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J T Albers, Y Li, G Lemasters, S Sprague, R Stinson, A Bhattacharya. 1997. An ergonomic education and evaluation program for apprentice carpenters.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199712)32%3A6%3C641%3A%3Aaid-ajim10%3E3.0.co%3B2-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of a workplace redesign of a grocery checkout system.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on the working postures and movements of a cashier when two different locations of the scales (one to the left of the cashier, the other under the conveyer belt in front of the cashier) were used in a grocery checkout system. Two cashiers (of average stature and short stature) were videotaped while working, in both sitting and standing working positions. Analysis of the video tapes was performed using the WOPALAS method and video observations. The results of the study show that the design of the checkout system with the scales under the conveyer belt provides a more favourable working position for both the taller and the shorter cashier. Additionally, the results indicate that a standing position is more favourable than a sitting one for the taller cashier while for the shorter cashier the sitting position is better.

Ergonomics

Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk systems--part 2: towards a framework approach.

This is the second paper in a series of two, reviewing human error identification approaches for risk assessment of high risk socio-technical systems. The previous paper identified and reviewed thirty-eight techniques. One of the closing comments was that no single technique sufficed for all the practitioner's needs, and that a potential way forward was to utilise a number of techniques in a toolkit fashion, or to develop a new framework-based or toolkit-based approach. This paper therefore describes in detail a framework approach developed for the UK nuclear power and reprocessing industry, showing the practical implementation of such a system. It then considers some of the advantages and disadvantages of such framework approaches. The paper also discusses some of the relationships between error identification and Ergonomics.

Ergonomics

Theory and practice for the implementation of 'in-house', continuous improvement participatory ergonomic programs.

This paper presents a case study of an implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in a public service agency. The objective of the study was to develop a theoretical model and related design principles for the implementation of 'in-house', continuous improvement participatory programs. The proposed model is based on the behavioral cybernetic theory of learning (Smith and Smith, 1966, Cybernetic Principles of Learning and Educational Design held, Rhinehart and Winsten, New York) and emphasizes the concepts of action, feedback, feedback control, and individual learning as essential for a progression from external regulation (by outside experts) to internal regulation (by organizational members) of participatory programs. Results support the proposed model, but do suggest an expansion of the model to include macro-level organizational variables as additional factors necessary for developing internally regulated participatory programs. Results have led to the specification of several design principles for implementing 'in-house', continuous improvement participatory programs.

Ergonomics