PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9391587

Temporal representations with cochlear implants.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To record and characterize intracochlear evoked potentials (EPs) for a variety of electrical stimuli in studies with cochlear implant patients. METHODS: Recordings were made with patients having direct percutaneous access to their implanted electrodes. Intracochlear voltages were recorded via unstimulated electrodes. The stimuli included trains of identical pulses, with pulse rates ranging from 100 to 4065/s, and a modulated pulse train produced by a single-channel speech processor, with the pulse rate of 824/s. RESULTS: Magnitudes of EPs for each pulse in trains of identical pulses were uniform for pulse rates below about 200/s. For rates between about 400 and 1000/s, an alternating pattern of EP magnitudes was observed, with relatively large EPs following the odd-numbered pulses. For rates between about 1000 and 3000/s, more complex patterns were observed. After the first millisecond of each train at even higher rates, uniform EPs again were observed across pulses, although the absolute magnitude of the EPs was much lower than that observed for low rates of stimulation. The approximate rates corresponding to boundaries between these different regions varied among subjects and among electrodes within subjects. EP magnitudes for the modulated pulse train reflected the gross periodicity of the modulation waveform but did not reflect temporal details within the periods. CONCLUSIONS: Population responses of the human auditory nerve, as indicated by EP magnitudes, reflect the amplitudes of electrical pulses for pulse rates below about 200/s and above about 3000/s. Use of intermediate rates may introduce distortions in the transmission of stimulus information with cochlear implants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B S Wilson, C C Finley, D T Lawson, M Zerbi. 1997. Temporal representations with cochlear implants.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9391587/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Preoperative imaging of the inner ear prior to the implantation of a multichannel cochlear implant using computed and MR technology].

CT and MRT are now standard examinations prior to insertion of a cochlear implant. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages in terms of discovering potentially pathological structures in the inner ear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pros and cons of using CT and MRT before cochlear implantation. CT is usually performed using axial planigraphic planes. Like MRT, bone-specific CT is helpful in the diagnosis of congenital and acquired changes within the inner ear. Congenital defects in the meatus acusticus internus, the endolymphatic duct and sac, the cochlea and the vestibulum can be diagnosed and also quantified. Infectious morphologic changes can be seen on CT images in their terminal residual state (sclerotic tissue). However, acute inflammation and fibrotic tissue is not visible on CT. T2-specific MRT images are very fluid sensitive and play a major role in preoperative cochlear implant diagnosis. This examination demonstrates fluid within the peri- and enolymphatic cave and permits the diagnostician to determine whether congenital or acquired diseases have destroyed such fluid-filled cavities. In order to demonstrate pathological changes in the temporal bone and neural structures in the inner ear, MRT is the preferred method. Displaying the modiolus and the cochlear nerve is extremely important because, in their absence, a cochlear implantation may be contra-indicated. MRT also demonstrates other neural structures such as the facial nerve. This information may be important for the surgeon, e.g. the state of the pneumatic system in the mastoid cavity (which is best visualised by bone-specific CT).

Cochlear Implantation↗

[Therapy techniques of deafness].

Techniques for treating hearing loss comprise surgery, hearing aids and rehabilitation. Medical treatments are devolved to the correction of the cause of the loss of hearing, essentially infection. In hearing loss, surgery is routinely used to repair the consequences of chronic infection and of trauma. It is also used for treatment of otospongiosis. It is used to place vibratory or electric prostheses, which will increase the quality of indications for surgery. For instance, cochlear implants can be used in profound or total, bilateral hearing loss. In parallel, the quality and the miniaturisation of external auditory devices is improving. Rehabilitation, by helping to reconstitute missing factors, comprises a third technique of treatment of hearing loss.

Cochlear Implantation↗