PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 939511

Circuit librarian serves five hospitals in shared program.

Abstract

There is increasing emphasis on continuing education of hospital personnel, who need and want access to information in order to be aware of advances in health care. Small hospitals cannot afford to duplicate extensive collections. Personnel of hospitals that are remote from urban centers often do not have opportunities to visit a resource library on a regular basis and do not have experience in searching the medical literature through the use of reference tools. It is increasingly evident that the circuit librarian program has served as a catalyst in establishing relationships between the hospitals and the university health sciences center. The director of the CHSL has consulted with the deans of the nursing and the medical schools and with various professors. They have promised that the schools will try to address identifiable continuing education needs or requests from the hospitals. Moreover, the circuit librarian meets with individual hospital personnel and then obtains information for them from the CHSL and its staff. The circuit librarian program is one way to meet community hospitals' needs for access to health sciences literature and to initiate peer interaction for information exchange.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J I Smith. 1976-04-16. Circuit librarian serves five hospitals in shared program.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/939511/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Methods in continuing professional education. Results of a pilot survey of physicians].

There is not enough evidence, that formal continuing education can improve the quality of patient care. A model to support the work of quality circles by improving the acquisition of new knowledge and skills through problem-based learning in small groups was suggested in 1991. The results of a pilot survey carried out in three different groups of physicians and professional health care workers gave evidence that the model is acceptable in Germany, where problem-based learning is virtually unknown. Attributes of study groups like inclusion of nonphysicians, who would also be accepted as moderators, were indicated by a great majority. Topics and groups should be chosen by the individual and not be imposed by a central organization. Of the four methods suggested for problem-solving-presentation of the solution by an expert, solving the problem in group work, advice from an external expert, use of electronic publications--at least three were selected by 62, 65 and 96% of the responders in the three different groups. 30% of the total of 108 responders favor all four methods. Three of the four tasks of organizations responsible for continuing education are accepted: 1. support of local study groups, 2. provision of consulting experts, 3. instillation of information centers using modern information technology. Production and application of case simulations to be used in the study groups were only accepted by 23%. The differences between groups could have been caused by external influence such as experience with case presentations. The results justify a survey with improved and extended methodology in a sample of doctors representative for the physicians working within the frame work of social insurance.

Education, Continuing