PubMed · 9400404
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Righter. 1997-12-01. Why?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9400404/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To examine personal beliefs and professional behavior of state criminal prosecutors toward end-of-life decisions. DESIGN: Mail survey. SETTING: District attorney offices nationwide. PARTICIPANTS: All prosecuting attorneys who are members of the National District Attorneys Association. A total of 2844 surveys were mailed with 2 follow-up mailings at 6-week intervals; 761 surveys were returned for a response rate of 26.8%. The majority of respondents were white men, Protestant, and served in rural areas. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On the basis of 4 case scenarios, (1) professional behavior as determined by respondents' willingness to prosecute and what criminal charges they would seek; and (2) personal beliefs as determined by whether prosecutors believed the physicians' actions were morally wrong and whether they would want the same action taken if they were in the patient's condition. RESULTS: Most respondents would not seek prosecution in 3 of the 4 cases. In the fourth case, involving physician-assisted suicide, only about one third of the respondents said that they definitely would prosecute. Those who would prosecute would most often seek a charge of criminal homicide. A majority of respondents believed that the physicians' actions were morally correct in each of the 4 cases and would want the same action taken if they were in the patient's position. There was a strong correlation between personal beliefs and professional behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: A large majority of responding prosecutors were unwilling to prosecute physicians in cases that clearly fall within currently accepted legal and professional boundaries. In the case of physician-assisted suicide, results reflected a surprisingly large professional unwillingness to prosecute and an even greater personal acceptance of physician-assisted suicide.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This article deals with the phenomenon of hope in seriously ill and dying patients. Uncertainty is seen as a prerequisite for hope, fear as the "negative" side of hope. A scheme involving three particular kinds of hope is introduced: Hope on a daily basis; hope concerning a possible eternity; and hope based upon unrealistic premises. In a clinical setting, the question is: Taking into consideration the issues of how to inform and communicate with patients, how may the physician help the patient to express hope, and how may the physician contribute to reinforcing the patient's hope? Within palliative medicine, treatment may involve many aspects of a patient's life. It should be directed against the physical aspects of the disease, as well as the psychological, social, spiritual and existential dimensions of life. There are two fundamental questions patients with terminal cancer disease almost always ask: "Will the disease eventually cause my death?"; and, "Am I going to experience great pain and suffering?" These questions are clearly marked by hope. The hope that there will be little pain, for example, may not only relate to physical pain but to psychological and social pain as well.