PubMed · 9495212
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T L Benning. 1998. Methods for cost-effectiveness study.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp%2F109.3.357
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
During the course of the past ten years, the World Bank has become the single largest external financier of health activities in low and middle income countries and an important voice in national and international debates on health policy. This article highlights the Bank's new strategic direction in the health sector aimed at: improving health, nutrition, and population outcomes of the poor; enhancing the performance of health care systems; and securing sustainable health care financing. Millions of preventable deaths and treatable illnesses, together with health systems that are inefficient, inequitable and ineffective, have motivated expanded Bank support for the health sector in many of its client countries. The new policy directions and system-wide reforms observed in these countries are the result of both demand and supply factors. It is part of a general shift in the Bank's approach to development assistance, which sees systemic reform as a way to improve the impact and sustainability of investments in health. On the demand side, the Bank is trying to adapt to ongoing political, technological, economic, demographic, epidemiological and social pressures. On the supply side, the Bank's growing international experience and substantial financial resources are used to complement the development assistance provided by other organizations and the global effort to improve health and health systems in low and middle income countries.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This paper aims to complement existing clinical guidelines by providing evidence of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. A series of decision-analytical models have been developed to reflect current diagnostic and treatment pathways for the five main causes of infertility. Data to populate the models are derived from a systematic review and routine National Health Service activity data, and are augmented with expert opinion. Costs are derived from an analysis of extra-contractual referral tariffs and private sector data. Sensitivity analysis has been carried out to take account of the uncertainty of model parameters and to allow results to be interpreted in the light of local circumstances. Results of the modelling exercise suggest in-vitro fertilization is the most cost-effective treatment option for severe tubal factors and endometriosis, with surgery the most cost-effective in the case of mild or moderate disease. Ovulatory factors should be treated medically with the addition of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in the presence of polycystic ovarian syndrome. For other causes, stimulated intrauterine insemination (unexplained and moderate male factor) and stimulated donor intrauterine insemination (severe male) are cost-effective.