PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9555182

[How I study syncope].

Abstract

The diagnosis of the cause of a syncope is based, above all, on the basis of a careful clinical history obtained from the patient or from persons who attended one of the episodes of loss of consciousness. It should also include a careful clinical examination comprising an electrocardiogram and, most often, an echocardiogram. The selection of further investigations should be guided by the existence or absence of an underlying cardiac disease. In the presence of a patent cardiac disease, one should first try to detect a disorder of cardiac rhythm (Holter, mini-Holter, possibly invasive electrophysiology); a dysfunction of the autonomic regulation of the cardiovascular system should only be considered in a second step (Tilt table test). The sequence of investigation should be reversed when syncope occurs in a patient without underlying cardiac disorder.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Kulbertus, P Mélon. 1998. [How I study syncope].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9555182/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evolving indications for permanent pacing.

Indications for permanent pacemakers have expanded in recent years. The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers were recently updated and now include several of the newer indications. Greatest interest about newer applications of pacemaker therapy focuses on hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Pacing for neurocardiogenic syncope remains controversial despite emerging data. Pacing for long QT syndrome, pacing after cardiac transplantation, and pacing for hemodynamic improvement in the occasional patient with first-degree atrioventricular block and hemodynamic compromise also warrant attention. Available clinical data are discussed in the context of the recent ACC and AHA guidelines.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Taking advantage of sophisticated pacemaker diagnostics.

The ever-increasing complexity of pacing systems, combined with functions that vary from one manufacturer to another, can pose challenges during analysis of device function. Standard pacemaker diagnostics are measured data, electrogram telemetry, maker annotations and event counters, albeit with their current limitations. New diagnostic features discussed include time-based diagnostics, histograms of sensed amplitudes, pacing thresholds, or impedance trending. Mode-switching algorithms, combined with diagnostic features, facilitate the use of dual-chamber devices in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. The introduction of electrogram storage into pacemakers further improves diagnostic capabilities and allows a permanent validation and optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms. External diagnostic devices, which provide Holter recordings with continuous marker annotations and patient-triggered diagnostics, are additional features that will become increasingly important.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac

How smart should pacemakers Be?

The concept of the "smart" pacemaker has been continuously changing during 40 years of progress in technology. When we talk today about smart pacemakers, it means optimal treatment, diagnosis, and follow-up for patients fitting the current indications for pacemakers. So what is smart today becomes accepted as "state of the art" tomorrow. Originally, implantable pacemakers were developed to save lives from prolonged episodes of bradycardia and/or complete heart block. Now, in addition, they improve quality of life via numerous different functions acting under specific conditions, thanks to the introduction of microprocessors. The devices have become smaller, with the miniaturization of the electrical components, without compromising longevity. Nevertheless, there are still some unmatched objectives for these devices, for example, the optimization of cardiac output and the management of atrial arrhythmias in dual-chamber devices. Furthermore, indications continue to evolve, which in turn require new, additional functions. These functions are often very complex, necessitating computerized programming to simplify application. In addition, the follow-up of these devices is time-consuming, as appropriate system performance has to be regularly monitored. A great many of these functions could be automatically performed and documented, thus enabling physicians and paramedical staff to avoid losing time with routine control procedures. In addition, modern pacemakers offer extensive diagnostic functions to help diagnose patient symptoms and pacemaker system problems. Different types of data are available, and their presentation differs from one company to the other. This huge amount of data can only be managed with automatic diagnostic functions. Thus, the smart pacemaker of the near future should offer high flexibility to permit easy programming of available therapies and follow-up, and extensive, easily comprehensible diagnostic functions.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac