PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9556958

Anesthesia control using midlatency auditory evoked potentials.

Abstract

This paper shows the development of a system to control inhalation anesthetic concentration delivered to a patient based upon that patient's midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP's). It was developed and tested in dogs by determining response to the supramaximal stimulus of tail clamping. Prior to tail clamp, the MLAEP was recorded along with inhalational anesthetic concentration and classified as responders or nonresponders as determined by tail clamping. This was performed at a number of different anesthetic levels to obtain a data training set. The MLAEP's were compacted by means of discrete time wavelet transform (DTWT), and together with anesthetic concentration value, a stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA) was performed to determine those features which could separate responders from nonresponders. It was determined that only three features were necessary for this recognition. These features were then used to train a four-layer artificial neural network (ANN) to separate the responders from nonresponders. The network was tested using a separate set of data, resulting in a 93% recognition rate in the anesthetic transition zone between responders and nonresponders, and 100% recognition rate outside this zone. The anesthetic controller used this ANN combined with fuzzy logic and rule-based control. A set of ten animal experiments were performed to test the robustness of this controller. Acceptable clinical performance was obtained, showing the feasibility of this approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Nayak, R J Roy. 1998. Anesthesia control using midlatency auditory evoked potentials.. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.664197

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effect of anesthetics on reflex micturition in the chronic cannula-implanted rat.

It is well known that urethane is a suitable anesthetic for acute studies and has been extensively recommended for investigations related to micturition physiology. This is mainly because of the capability of urethane anesthesia to spare reflex micturition as well as its easily established long-lasting and stable anesthetic level. However, urethane anesthesia is usually restricted to acute experiments due to its potential toxicity. This study searched for an alternative to urethane that would be suitable for studies in which recovery from anesthesia was needed. The list of administered drugs was as follows: pentobarbital, thiobutabarbital, ketamine-acepromazine, ketamine-diazepam, tiletamine-zolazepam, fentanyl-droperidol, alphaxalone-alphadolone, propofol, isoflurane, methoxyflurane, azaperone, tribromoethanol, and buprenorphine. Among these drugs, only tiletamine-zolazepam spared the reflex micturition contractions. However, the duration of this anesthesia was too short (approximately 30 minutes) to complete the necessary testing and additional dosing of the anesthetic generally obliterated the micturition reflex. On the other hand, rats given i.v. urethane infusion (10% solution in 0.9% saline, 3.2-4.0 mg/kg/min, total dose 0.56-1.03 g/kg) maintained a stable anesthesia that permitted both reflex micturition and stereotaxic procedures. Rats moved spontaneously 3-16 hours after cessation of i.v. urethane anesthesia and completely recovered in 2 days without significant after-effects. Bladder function was normal. No pathological changes were seen 1 week later. The present results suggest that urethane is the most suitable anesthetic for acute and chronic physiological experiments that require demonstration of reflex micturition. Neurourol. Urodynam. 19:87-99, 2000.

Anesthesia