PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9571847

Root form implants for tomorrow.

Abstract

However, accepting the route of dental implantology's evolution, and with a positive outlook for the future, the author believes that the four types of root form implants described here will be utilized. This belief in their application, has come from vast experience placing thousands of implants into various types of bone. It is now up to those dentists who have become exclusively involved with one type of root form implant to reflect on the ideas expressed in this article, and start to challenge what has been considered the "norm", and consider treating their patients with implants that will most likely prove to be superior in design and function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L I Linkow, M Gelbart. 1996. Root form implants for tomorrow.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9571847/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine. Outcome after circumferential fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-five patients with a pseudarthrosis after previous spinal fusion surgery were reviewed after a circumferential fusion was performed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the fusion rate and its relation to outcome, i.e., pain reduction and return to work, and associated complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Circumferential fusion has become a common procedure with more patients undergoing multiple operations. This operation is thought to improve the fusion rate with a low complication rate. However, the procedure has not been evaluated specifically for the management of pseudarthrosis. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were reviewed regarding age, gender, smoking status, previous back surgeries, extent of leg and back pain, occupation, levels of surgery, type of instrumentation, blood loss, and complications. A minimum follow-up period of 2 years included evaluation of radiographs, pain levels, medication, and return to work. RESULTS: Twenty percent of patients were heavy smokers. An average of 2.2 previous procedures had been performed, and the average follow-up period was 2.7 years. Eighty percent of patients underwent multiple-level fusions. A solid fusion was achieved in 100%. Complications included two painful instrumentation devices requiring removal, one retroperitoneal hematoma, one anterior abdominal wall dehiscence, and one case of pneumonia. Pain scores improved from 7.4 to 4.7 for back pain, and 5.4 to 2.8 for leg pain, respectively. Both improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.01 and 0.003, respectively). However, only 52% of patients reduced their pain by a full category. Forty-one percent were still taking narcotics intermittently or consistently, and 53% returned to work or were actively seeking employment. DISCUSSION: A fusion rate of 100% was noted in the face of factors often placing patients at high risk for developing a pseudarthrosis, namely multiple levels of previous spinal surgery, including previous pseudarthrosis, and a habit of heavy smoking. Complications were few. However, the satisfactory outcome rate was only somewhat better than 50%, based on a lack of substantial pain improvement and return to work.

Bone Screws

Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: The location of pedicle screws (n = 244) and the increase in the pedicle diameter were determined by computed tomography after screw removal in 50 patients with 360 degrees lumbar fusions. The neurologic findings were examined before and after surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and preoperative and postoperative neurologic findings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incorrect placement of pedicle screws that was detected by computed tomography has been published in several studies. Simultaneous pathologic neurologic deficits are thought to be created by an eccentric screw track. METHODS: Two observers controlled the screw tracts and pedicle diameters. The results were compared with preoperative and postoperative neurologic findings. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent (144 of 244) of screws were placed centrally in the pedicle. More than half of the eccentric screws (100, 41%; medial 79, 32.4%; lateral 21, 8.6%) penetrated the pedicle wall less than 2 mm (51; 20.9%). In only one patient (0.5%) a radicular irritation was found without objective electrophysiologic correlation when the screw was more than 6 mm medial to the pedicle wall. After screw removal, an insignificant increase in the size of the pedicle diameter in L1-S1 was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced surgeons implant pedicle screws with an accuracy of approximately 80%. The accuracy could be improved by using image-guided insertion equipment. The neurologic symptoms are rarely influenced by an eccentric pedicle screw tract even if penetration of the pedicle wall is more than 6 mm. The results stress the importance of preoperative planning (pedicle diameter, pedicle angle, screw length) when implanting transpedicular fixators.

Bone Screws

Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 21 patients in which cervical pedicle screw fixation was used at C7 with or without upper thoracic pedicle screw fixation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of pedicle screw placement in the lower cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of posterior cervical spine fixation, including lateral mass fixation, has become increasingly popular in recent years. However, lateral mass fixation at C7 is often hindered by lack of substantial high quality bone. The end level of long cervical spine constructs is frequently C7 or T1. Dissatisfaction with lateral mass fixation at C7 and T1 led the authors to use lower cervical pedicle screw fixation for several cervical spine disorders. METHODS: Twenty-one patients who had undergone cervical pedicle screw fixation at C7 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 12 males and 9 females, with an average age of 52 years. All pedicle screws were placed, after direct palpation of the pedicle, with a right angle nerve hook after laminoforaminotomy at C7. RESULTS: There were no neurologic complications related to pedicle screw placement, and no patient was symptomatically worse after the operation. Six patients with root pathology improved. Of 14 patients with cervical myelopathy, 12 improved at least one Nurick grade, and 2 had no improvement. There were no failures of fixation or complications related to pedicle fixation at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws in C7 placed with laminoforaminotomy and palpation technique appears to be safe and efficacious. Excellent fixation can be achieved.

Bone Screws