PubMed · 9599876
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Seward. 1998-04-11. Specialisation makes progress.. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809609
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family Therapy Education (COAMFTE) requires that accredited programs evaluate trainees' clinical skills at various times during trainees' programs. The Commission does not attempt, however, to describe for programs either the nature of the skills nor how they are to be evaluated, leaving this to the programs to create. This paper describes the development and uses of the Basic Skills Evaluation Device (BSED). Using a published list of skills (Figley & Nelson, 1989), data from the literature, and data collected from COAMFTE accredited and candidacy programs, the authors and their colleagues developed a device for supervisors to use in evaluating beginning family therapists. Data regarding the reliability of the device are presented, along with limitations and suggestions for various ways of using the device.
OBJECTIVE: Record keeping contributes to the quality of health care in addition to fulfilling medicolegal and accreditation regulations. We conducted an audit of patient files in 15 public hospitals in Aquitaine to determine their compliance with national laws. METHODS: One hundred patient files were randomly selected in each hospital. Their compliance with 18 criteria established in 1992 by the ANDEM was studied. These 18 criteria were updated in accordance with the latest decrees from the health ministry and precisely defined in order to achieve good reproducibility of the measurements. RESULTS: Ten percent of the files fulfilled all 18 criteria. Each component of the record was correctly identified and the name of the general practitioner, admission documents, and delivery, anesthesia and transfusion records were almost always present. Surgery reports were found in 65 to 89% of the files. Low compliance with three criteria was observed: authorization to give health care to a minor (39 to 80% of the files), identification of the physician who prescribed the drugs during hospitalization (6 to 32%) and discharge prescription (42 to 95%). We also pinpointed problems concerning archiving and retrieval, especially concerning the results of complementary exams which were not necessarily stored with the patient files. CONCLUSION: This audit allowed us to define the first steps of a quality improvement project for patient records. We were able to deduct recommendations for analyzing compliance with legal requirements and suggest that the 1992 ANDEM criteria be updated to allow for valid comparisons between health care establishment.