PubMed · 9634319
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D M Patrick. 1998. Sample size and diagnostic test evaluations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9634319/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A number of methods are commonly employed for the determination of protein in biological samples. Unfortunately, several compounds that are constituents of biological buffers interfere with these methods, limiting their application. Previous studies have demonstrated that tyrosine rapidly undergoes nitration in nitric acid to yield 3-nitrotyrosine, which has a lambdamax of 358 nm. Utilizing this reaction, we have developed a one-step method for the assessment of protein content in biological samples. Common interfering substances, including SDS, urea, glycerol, ammonium sulfate, and beta-mercaptoethanol, do not interfere with this method. Because of its simplicity, this reaction might be useful for estimating protein content in a variety of biological samples.
The Thin Prep Pap Test (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, MA) received approval by the Food and Drug Administration in May 1996 as an alternative to the traditional conventional smear. The present direct-to-vial study assessed the utility of thin-layer technology for cervicovaginal screening in clinical practice. From May 1997-February 1998 (10 mo), 15,006 cervical smears were processed and evaluated; of these, 5,423 (36.1%) were conventional smears (CS) and 9,583 (63.9%) were Thin Prep slides (TP). Both methods were analyzed to compare specimen adequacy and detection rates of cervical lesions. The TP method reduced the "satisfactory but limited by" rate by 97% and the unsatisfactory rate by 63%. For low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), TP slides yielded 3.6% (348/9,583) as compared to 0.98% (53/5,423) for CS, an increase of 267%. The TP method detected a threefold increase in the number of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) of 1.0% (100/9,583), as compared to 0.3% (17/5,425) for the CS group. The atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASCUS SIL) ratio was reduced by 54% in the TP group. In routine usage in our laboratory, the Thin Prep Pap Test yielded a significant increase in the detection of LSILs and HSILs as compared to conventional smears. Specimen adequacy was significantly improved.