PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9743776

Structuring ward rounds for learning: can opportunities be created?

Abstract

This paper explores the ways in which ward rounds can be conducted to maximize educational opportunities, as part of a project to improve the effectiveness of on-the-job training (OJT) for hospital doctors. Ninety ward rounds taken by 24 trainers in the Anglia region were observed. Each observation produced a note of the ward round's structure and routines and of the contributions made to it by trainers and trainees. Teaching was a feature of all ward rounds and different types of rounds were valued for different reasons. A range of ward round structures was observed and, within each, a range of routines for conducting the round. Ward round structures fell into four categories, with almost three-quarters of trainers making no use of either pre- or post-round meetings. Where such meetings took place, however, opportunities for OJT were created and, in some cases, optimized through routines to encourage trainee contributions. Discussion time away from patients structured into ward rounds enabled trainers and trainees to take advantage of many opportunities to learn from service. Although unplanned and unsystematic opportunities for OJT do arise, far more reliable are those created through systematic planning and preparation. Trainers have choices to make about how they conduct ward rounds and by choosing to make use of pre- and/or post-ward round sessions, valuable opportunities for OJT can be created.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Stanley. 1998. Structuring ward rounds for learning: can opportunities be created?. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00201.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in Europe: results of a rheumatologist-based survey at a EULAR meeting.

OBJECTIVE: To document the practice of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) by a sample of European rheumatologists attending an annual general meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). METHODS: English-language questionnaires were distributed to 180 randomly selected participants attending imaging-related sessions at the XIV EULAR meeting in Glasgow, UK, in 1999. The questionnaire was divided into four sections: Demographics, Education and Training, Current Practice, and Equipment. RESULTS: Ninety-two rheumatologists responded, representing 74 centres from 19 European countries. Seventy-eight (85%) of the respondents either already used US in their clinical practice or would like to use it in the future. Thirty-seven (40%) respondents performed US within their own department. Few had received training at undergraduate level and most had learned informally or by attending courses. Scans were considered most useful for large joints and ligaments/tendons. Only 28 (30%) respondents valued US for guided injections. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although containing an element of selection bias, confirms a great interest in musculoskeletal US by rheumatologists across Europe and a demand which is likely to increase. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardized training guidelines.

Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗