PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9750256

Modeling multivariate discrete failure time data.

Abstract

A bivariate discrete survival distribution that allows flexible modeling of the marginal distributions and yields a constant odds ratio at any grid point is proposed. The distribution can be extended to a multivariate distribution and is readily generalized to accommodate covariates in the marginal distributions and pairwise odds ratios. In addition, a pseudo-likelihood estimation procedure for estimating the regression coefficients in the marginal models and the association parameters in the pairwise odds ratios is presented. We evaluate the performance of the proposed estimation procedure through simulations. For bivariate data, pseudo-likelihood estimation of the association parameter has high efficiency. Loss of efficiency in the marginal regression coefficient estimates is small when the association is not strong. For both the marginal regression coefficients and the association parameter, coverage probabilities are close to the 95% nominal level. For multivariate data, the simulation results show that the parameter estimates are consistent. Coverage probability for the regression coefficient in the marginal model is close to the 95% nominal level but is slightly less than the nominal level for the association parameter. We illustrate the proposed methods using a subset of the Framingham Heart Study data where a significant positive association was found between the failure times of siblings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Shih. 1998. Modeling multivariate discrete failure time data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9750256/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Repeated measures in clinical trials: simple strategies for analysis using summary measures.

The summary measures approach to analysing repeated measures is described. The circumstances under which it can be advantageous to use such measures are considered. Strategies for baseline adjustment where there are multiple baselines are examined, as is the choice of appropriate summary statistic. A compromise trend/mean measure, regression through the origin, is proposed as being useful under some circumstances. An analysis using this measure is illustrated with a suitable example.

Biometry↗

Prenatal detection of a high-risk group for intrauterine growth restriction based on sonographic fetal biometry.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the significance of sonographic fetal biometry in predicting low birth weight. METHOD: Five hundred and sixty-eight single-term pregnancies were analyzed. They were stratified into seven subgroups by birth weight deviation (BWD). Among the 568 pregnancies, 115 were revealed to be small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (birth weight less than mean -1.5 S. D.). When IUGR was suspected by routine sonographic fetal biometry, 'IUGR work-up' was carried out. The diagnostic performance of our screening method for the detection of SGA pregnancies in the general population was calculated. RESULT: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and odds ratio of our screening method for the detection of SGA pregnancies in the general population were 73.0, 96.6, 83.2, 98.0% and 131.0, respectively. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that sonographic biometry is useful for the prenatal detection of high-risk cases of fetal growth restriction.

Biometry↗

Validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study whereby all ultrasonic biometric measurements were done by a single observer. Fifty pregnant women at term had ultrasonic measurement of various fetal biometric parameters performed within a week of delivery. Fetal weight was estimated by the use of four reported methods (Aoki, Campbell, Shepard, and Hadlock formulas). We compared estimated weight with the birth weight after the estimated fetal weight was adjusted by adding 25 g for each day between the ultrasound measurements and delivery. RESULTS: The adjusted estimated fetal weight obtained from all four formulas tended to be lower than measured birth weight. The smallest mean difference was obtained with the Shepard and Aoki formulas (51.4 g and 60.5 g, respectively), whereas the Campbell and Hadlock formulas produced larger mean differences (141.8 g and 190.7 g, respectively). The Aoki formula generated the smallest range between the limits of agreement (-324.2 to 445.2 g) whereas the Campbell formula produced the largest range (-286.5 to 570.1 g). The range between the limits of agreement generated with the Shepard and Hadlock formulas were intermediate between those produced by the Aoki and Campbell formulas. The intraclass correlation coefficients generated with the Aoki and Shepard formulas were identical (0.90). The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained with the Hadlock (0.84) and Campbell formulas (0.85) were lower. CONCLUSION: The validity of ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term with all four formulas was high.

Biometry↗