PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9753977

Improving the human-computer interface: a human factors engineering approach.

Abstract

Human factors engineering involves the application of information about human behavior and characteristics in the design and testing of products, systems, and environments. A computing system's interface is developed on the basis of potential users' capabilities and limitations, the users' tasks, and the environment in which those tasks are performed. When human factors engineers work with users, subject-matter experts, and developers to design and test a system, they analyze and document users' tasks and requirements and develop prototype designs. Usability studies are conducted and user errors are analyzed to identify problems and develop recommendations for improving the human-computer interface.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A V Salvemini. Improving the human-computer interface: a human factors engineering approach.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9753977/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical nutrition managers have access to sources of empowerment.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain perceived access of dietitians to power in the workplace. DESIGN: The conceptual framework was Kanter's theory of organizational power. The Conditions for Work Effectiveness Questionnaire was used to measure perceived access to sources of power: information, support, resources, and opportunities. Demographic data were collected to identify factors that may enhance empowerment. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS: The questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 348 dietitians chosen from members of the Clinical Nutrition Management dietetic practice group of the American Dietetic Association. Blank questionnaires were returned by 99 (28.4%) people not working as clinical nutrition managers, which left 249 in the sample. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics were used to organize and summarize data. One-way analysis of variance and t tests were performed to identify differences in responses based on levels of education, work setting, and information technology skills. RESULTS: Usable questionnaires were received from 178 people (71.5%). On a 5-point scale, scores for access to information (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 3.8 +/- 0.7), opportunity (mean +/- SD = 3.6 +/- 0.7), support (mean +/- SD = 3.2 +/- 0.9), and resources (mean +/- SD = 3.1 +/- 0.8) demonstrated that clinical nutrition managers perceived themselves as having substantial access to sources of empowerment. Those having higher levels of education, working in larger hospitals, having better-developed information technology skills, and using information technology more frequently had statistically significant higher empowerment scores (P = < or = .05) than contrasting groups in each category. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSION: Clinical nutrition managers are empowered and able to assume leadership roles in today's health care settings. Their power may be enhanced by asserting more pressure to gain greater access to sources of power: support, information, resources, and opportunities.

Computer Literacy↗

Informed decisions by clinicians are fundamental for EPR implementation.

Most often the investment in electronic patient records (EPR) is decided upon on the basis of descriptions of all the advantages this new technology will bring. We argue that an exchange of a paper-based patient record (PPR) with an EPR is an efficient way to automate manual routine work and distribute information but the real benefits from EPR depend on how clinicians use an EPR application to improve the quality of care. We introduce the 'price to pay' concept in order to illustrate that it takes a human effort to create better health care and that clinicians therefore play a very important role when implementing EPR systems.

Computer Literacy↗