PubMed · 9757908
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J H Check. 1998. A negative study with power?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00234-9
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Anticardiolipin (anti-CL) antibodies, diagnostic for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, are associated with increased risks of venous and arterial thrombosis. Because CL selectively enhances activated protein C/protein S-dependent anticoagulant activities in purified systems and because CL is not known to be a normal plasma component, we searched for CL in plasma. Plasma lipid extracts [chloroform/methanol (2:1, vol/vol)] were subjected to analyses by using TLC, analytical HPLC, and MS. A plasma lipid component was purified that was indistinguishable from reference CL (M:1448). When CL in 40 fasting plasma lipid extracts (20 males, 20 females) was quantitated by using HPLC, CL (mean +/- SD) was 14.9 +/- 3.7 microgram/ml (range 9.1 to 24.2) and CL was not correlated with phosphatidylserine (3.8 +/- 1.7 microgram/ml), phosphatidylethanolamine (64 +/- 20 microgram/ml), or choline-containing phospholipid (1,580 +/- 280 microgram/ml). Based on studies of fasting blood donors, CL (>/=94%) was recovered in very low density, low density, and high density lipoproteins (11 +/- 5.3%, 67 +/- 11.0%, and 17 +/- 10%, respectively), showing that the majority of plasma CL (67%) is in low density lipoprotein. Analysis of relative phospholipid contents of lipoproteins indicated that high density lipoprotein is selectively enriched in CL and phosphatidylethanolamine. These results shows that CL is a normal plasma component and suggest that the epitopes of antiphospholipid antibodies could include CL or oxidized CL in lipoproteins or in complexes with plasma proteins (e. g., beta(2)-glycoprotein I, prothrombin, protein C, or protein S) or with platelet or endothelial surface proteins.
UNLABELLED: Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are frequently associated with thrombotic disorders in the so-called antiphospholipid syndrome. Together with anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA) is the main diagnostic tool for aPL detection. Since LA determination is based on the finding of prolonged clotting time in vitro, concomitant anticoagulant therapy may significantly interfere with its detection. We report a case of a boy in whom recurrent aPL-related thrombosis heralded for several months the onset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Abnormally increased in vitro clotting times at the time of the second thrombotic event led to the suspicion of the presence of LA activity. However, this latter finding was difficult to interpret since the patient was already on heparin treatment at the time of our first observation. Thus, LA was assayed using a commercial kit in which a heparin neutralizer is included (Staclot LA). Two consecutive samples from the patient were compared with eight patients on anticoagulant therapy for non-aPL-related thrombotic events and 20 healthy controls. The study showed that, taking into account the concomitant anticoagulant treatment, Staclot LA was positive only in the propositus, raising the suspicion of a possible aPL-related origin of the thrombotic event. This issue was definitively confirmed in a subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present report shows that aPL-related deep vein thrombosis can be the earliest clinical manifestation of pediatric SLE, and that Staclot LA may have a role in LA detection during the course of anticoagulant treatment.
Thrombotic lesions are consistently observed in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and frequently found in primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). It remains unknown, however, whether thrombosis is related to defects of the antithrombotic pathway or to previous vascular injury. This study therefore analysed the frequency of both hereditary and acquired thrombotic risk factors in CTEPH and PPH. One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients with CTEPH investigated in the author's institution were compared to 99 consecutive patients with PPH. In 116 CTEPH patients and 83 PPH patients, phospholipid-dependent antibodies (antiphospholipid antibodies and lupus anticoagulant) were analysed by both immunological and clotting assays. In patients enrolled since 1994 (46 CTEPH and 64 PPH), hereditary thrombotic risk factors were also determined. Antithrombin, protein C and protein S activities were measured by functional assays. Mutations of factor V and factor II were identified by polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of hereditary thrombotic risk factors was not increased in patients with either PPH or CTEPH. In contrast, a high frequency of phospholipid-dependent antibodies was observed in PPH (10%) and more notably in CTEPH (20%). Moreover, in PPH, antibodies were present only in low titre whereas in CTEPH, half of the patients with antiphospholipid antibodies had high titres. In addition, in CTEPH all but one of the patients with lupus anticoagulant also had antiphospholipid antibodies. The most striking finding of this study was the high prevalence of phospholipid-dependent antibodies but their clinical relevance appears to be different in primary pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In primary pulmonary hypertension, these antibodies in low titre probably reflect endothelial dysfunction. In contrast, in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension the presence of antibodies in high titre associated with lupus anticoagulant, underlines the role of thrombosis in the pathogenesis of this condition.