PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9773874

Quantitative flow cytometry: inter-laboratory variation.

V E Zenger·R Vogt·F Mandy·A Schwartz·G E Marti
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quantitative flow cytometry (QFCM) offers a means of standardization within and between flow cytometers. QFCM parameters were set by determining the antibody-binding capacity (ABC) of CD4, CD8, and CD3 cells from 10 normal donors with the use of eight FACScan flow cytometers. QC3 beads and a certified blank bead were used to set up the instruments. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated to molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome (MESF) microbead standards was used before and after the donor samples were run to ensure that the machines were operating consistently. Lyophilized cells (Cytotrol) were used as a target, to control for antigen expression in the cell preparation. Quantitative Simply Cellular (QSC) beads were used to establish a standard calibration curve for each of the FITC and phycoerythrin antibody conjugates on each of the instruments. Single-parameter fluorescent histograms derived from list-mode files were used to calculate the slope (coefficient of response), intercept (zero channel), number of channels per decade, and ABC or MESF threshold (blank bead). The fluorescence intensity (geometric mean) of the positive and negative donor cell populations was compared with the standard curves, and the ABCs were calculated. The results show consistent instrument performance between laboratories. However, after standardization of CD3, CD4, and CD8 ABCs to microbeads, large variations were noted between donors and laboratories. The source of this variation does not appear to be in the instrumentation but may be due to the lack of an unified set-up protocol, introducing issues of antibody saturation, methods for whole blood lysis and fixation, and the behavior of the microbead standards.

Explore related subjects

Flow CytometryFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateHumansLymphocyte SubsetsMicrospheresObserver VariationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V E Zenger, R Vogt, F Mandy, A Schwartz, G E Marti. 1998-10-01. Quantitative flow cytometry: inter-laboratory variation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19981001)33%3A2%3C138%3A%3Aaid-cyto8%3E3.0.co%3B2-f

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

The early fluidic and optical physics of cytometry.

All forms of cytometry, depend on the basic laws of physics, including those of fluidics, optics, and electronics, most of which were established centuries ago. Flow cytometry depends critically on the fluidics presenting each individual cell with precision to the sensing volume. This is intersected by a high-intensity light source, and light scattering and fluorescence from suitably stained constituents in each cell are captured by the light-collecting optics and measured. The works and observations of Bernoulli and Euler in the 18th century, Reynolds in the 19th century, and Crosland-Taylor in the 20th century in the field of fluid dynamics laid the foundations for hydrodynamic focussing, which is the primary prerequisite for presenting individual cells to the sensing volume. In addition, electrostatic cell sorters must have the ability to generate stable droplet formation in the jet-stream issuing from the flow chamber nozzle. The origins here can be traced to work carried out in the early to mid-19th century by Savart, Magnus, and Thomson. Flow, image, and confocal cytometry are all dependent on the laws of optics, including those of reflection and refraction as well as numerous other optical principles. The observations and works of Socrates, Ptolemy, Snel, and Descartes between about BC 370 and 1637 were of seminal importance in developing the laws of reflection and refraction. In the mid-17th century Hooke illustrated the power of magnifying glasses and microscopy in his Micrographia and Newton was responsible for explaining colours in the spectrum. Huygens, toward the end of the 17th century, put forward the concept of point source light propagation contributing to a wave front. Finally, Thomas Young, early in the 19th century, established the wave form of light from interference patterns. Most people will be familiar with some of these discoveries and the investigators who carried out the work; some people will be familiar with all of these. However, very few people are likely to have had the opportunity and privilege to access the very early works and the original data and manuscripts, or translations thereof, which laid the foundations of physics that enabled our discipline to be established. It is always important for any discipline to remember its roots and to appreciate the seed from which those roots grew, for it is much easier to learn and fully understand when we have a knowledge of the source and the logical progressions that lead from one discovery to the next. This knowledge lends perspective to our current endeavours as the past, after all, created the present, which in turn contributes to the future. In this article, which was presented as an invited lecture at the 9th Canadian Consensus meeting on AIDS, I have attempted to trace the origins of the early work on the physics of fluidics and optics, which laid the foundations.

Flow Cytometry↗
PubMed1999

IgA class antibodies and flow cytometric cross-matching in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The established method of pretransplant cross-matching does not detect IgA antibodies, and IgA antibodies have thus been ignored when assessing patients for transplantation. The aim of this study was to detect IgA allo- and autoreactive antibodies using flow cytometry and to correlate the results with transplant outcome. METHODS: Pretransplant sera from 231 sequential renal recipients were tested for serum IgA levels and antibodies directed against the Fab portion of the human IgG molecule. Fifty-nine recipients with sufficient stored donor lymphocytes were also tested by flow cytometry for donor-specific alloantibodies of the IgA isotype. RESULTS: Graft survival was improved in recipients with higher IgA levels. High IgA anti-Fab levels led to a significantly higher 1-year graft survival (P<0.05). Graft survival was further enhanced where both serum IgA and IgA anti-Fab were raised (P<0.01). Although the mean IgA level tended to be higher for recipients with a positive IgA flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM), the IgA FCXM was not associated with increased IgA anti-Fab, suggesting that the IgA FCXM is detecting a different subset of IgA reactivity. Additionally, for primary grafts, a positive IgA FCXM was not associated with enhanced graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Within the repertoire of IgA activity, there are two recognizable groups, the IgA anti-Fab specificity, which is significantly associated with enhanced graft survival, and that detected by the IgA FCXM, which surprisingly is more likely to be positive in less sensitized first grafts and is not associated with enhanced graft survival.

Flow Cytometry↗