PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9795650

A comparative study of a comprehensive basic sciences test using paper-and-pencil and computerized formats.

R M Luecht·A Hadadi·D B Swanson·S M Case
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

ComputersEducational MeasurementHumansLicensure, MedicalScienceStudents, MedicalUnited StatesComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Luecht, A Hadadi, D B Swanson, S M Case. 1998. A comparative study of a comprehensive basic sciences test using paper-and-pencil and computerized formats.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199810000-00043

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Computing 2010: from black holes to biology.

By 2010, a click on the PC on your desktop will suffice to call up instantly all the computing power you need from what by then will be the world's largest supercomputer, the Internet itself. Supercomputing for the masses will trigger a revolution in the complexity of problems that are tackled, whole disciplines will go digital and, rather than spending time collecting their own data, scientists will organize themselves around shared data sets.

Computers↗
PubMed1999

[Relationship between occupation and elbow pain, epicondylitis].

Twelve controlled epidemiological studies describing the relationship between epicondylitis and work were found. The studies showed evidence for an association between forceful work and a combination of repetition and forceful work and development of elbow pain, epicondylitis. No controlled studies showing an association between work with visual display units or use of computer mouse and epicondylitis were found. No relationship was found between unaccustomed work and development of epicondylitis. Age and time spent in the employment seem to be disposing factors. Generally the studies did not distinguish between medial and lateral epicondylitis. The studies were characterized by small study populations. Further research including quantitative evaluation of exposure factors and patophysiology is needed.

Computers↗