PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9800871

CABG risk model.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Ivanov. 1998. CABG risk model.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00678-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Calculated volume of prostate cancer identifies patients with clinical stage T1C disease at high risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the calculated volume of prostate cancer (cVca) in patients with clinical Stage T1c prostate cancer who were treated surgically was a good predictor of biochemical disease-free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1996, patients with prostate cancer who were surgically treated for clinical Stage T1c at Brigham and Women's Hospital were retrospectively evaluated, and 188 patients (median PSA 6.9 ng/mL) were included in this study. cVca (determined by cancer-specific PSA, prostate volume, and Gleason grade), pathologic stage, and time to PSA failure were assessed. RESULTS: cVca correlated strongly with the preoperative PSA level (P <0.00001, chi-square test), Gleason grade (P <0.00001), and pathologic stage (P <0.00001). Kaplan-Meier curves for PSA disease-free survival were constructed for patients with cVca less than 0.5 cm(3) (group 1), cVca of 0.5 to 4.0 cm(3) (group 2), and cVca greater than 4.0 cm(3) (group 3). The 2-year PSA disease-free survival rate was 100%, 81%, and 36% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P <0.0001). Cox multiple regression analysis demonstrated that cVca was superior to PSA and Gleason score for determination of serologic PSA failure after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that cVca is a good predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients with clinical Stage T1c prostate cancer. Perhaps, after validation by others, cVca can serve as a tool in choosing various treatment options for prostate cancer.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

The influence of conventional and cross-reactive group HLA matching on cardiac transplant outcome: an analysis from the United Network of Organ Sharing Scientific Registry.

BACKGROUND: The short tolerable cold ischemia time and the importance of other risk factors have generally superseded the role of HLA matching in the allocation of donor hearts. Recent advances in the accuracy and time required to perform HLA typing and crossmatching, however, have led us to re-examine the United Network of Organ Sharing Transplant Registry for the effects of the HLA incompatibility on outcome in relation to other possible risk factors. METHODS: These include conventional HLA-A, -B, and cross-reactive group (CREG) mismatching (mm), HLA-DR mm, pretransplantation panel-reactive antibody (PRA), recipient and donor race and donor age, cold ischemia time, and the pretransplantation use of either a left ventricular assist device or an intra-aortic balloon pump. RESULTS: Three-year survival was clearly inferior in non-white (0.6921) as compared with white (0.7632) recipients, but this difference could not be accounted for by the degree of donor-recipient HLA mm that had occurred by chance. Nevertheless, the degree of mm that did occur seemed to have an impact on survival. The importance of HLA-DR mm was confirmed, and it ranked only behind the use of an assist device and recipient race in the multivariate analysis. HLA-A and B mm exerted an additional effect, but this was only true in white recipients. Of these, HLA-A achieved statistical significance as an independent risk factor. In general, CREG mm was not a significant variable. However, more than twice as many 0-1 or 0-2 CREG, 0 DR mm as compared with 0-1 or 0-2 A,B, 0 DR mm transplants enjoyed approximately equal and very good 1- and 3-year survival. Assuming no change is cold ischemia time, the potential number of 0 CREG, 0 DR mm, ABO-compatible transplants that could be achieved when an Organ Procurement Organization had 50-100 patients on their waiting list was calculated. The surprisingly high frequency of approximately 24-36% suggests that this favorable match could be considered along with other important factors in the local allocation process. When pretransplantation PRA was analyzed as a continuous variable from 0 to 100%, it was a highly significant risk factor, but this effect was more strikingly evident when the PRA was analyzed in 20% increments above zero. Recently, left ventricular assist device usage has become increasingly common, and it has been associated with strikingly increased pretransplantation PRA levels. When they occur together, the data indicates that these patients are at a very high risk for graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that newer typing and crossmatching techniques make it possible to add HLA criteria to the allocation protocol of donor cardiac organs and would lead to improved long-term survival.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.

Optimal design of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) mapping studies requires a precise understanding of the power of QTL linkage versus QTL association analysis, under a range of different conditions. In this article, we investigate the power of QTL linkage and association analyses for simple random sibship samples, under the variance-components model proposed by Fulker et al. After a brief description of an extension of this variance-components model, we show that the powers of both linkage and association analyses are crucially dependent on the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to the QTL. The main difference between the two tests is that, whereas the power of association is directly related to the QTL heritability, the power of linkage is related more closely to the square of the QTL heritability. We also describe both how the power of linkage is attenuated by incomplete linkage and incomplete marker information and how the power of association is attenuated by incomplete linkage disequilibrium.

Chi-Square Distribution↗