PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9805737

[Major statistical software usable in epidemiology].

Abstract

Quality assurance of biostatistical data analysis is becoming mandatory. The aim of this review of statistical software was to guide uses who are faced with the increasing number of these tools. A list of softwares was obtained from statisticians and computer scientists, computerized databases, computer science lay press, and commercial documents. The softwares were described and their possibilities measured. The following functions were studied: functions considered as essential (descriptive analysis, Student's t, Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon, ANOVA, Kruskall-Wallis, Pearson's chi 2, Fisher's exact test, Pearson's r), survival and multivariate analysis (logistic regression, proportional hazards modelling, times series). User-friendliness and quality of graphs were also studied. Among the 220 listed softwares, 26 could be considered as general softwares and were extensively analyzed. Statistical softwares may be classified into four categories: easy-to-use general public softwares with limited functions, such as EPI INFO; simple reference softwares with satisfactory user-friendliness and performing most of the statistical analyses, such as PCSM, STATISTICA or STATA; complex reference softwares intended for statisticians (EPILOG PLUS, SAS); specific cases such as EGRET performing only multivariate analysis or SUPERANOVA performing only analysis of variance. Such a review should be regularly updated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Binquet, C Verret, G Chêne, L R Salmi, L Letenneur, G Palmer, M Hajjar, R Salamon. 1998. [Major statistical software usable in epidemiology].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9805737/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗