PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9832897

The autonomy paradox: predictive genetic testing and autonomy: three essential problems.

Abstract

The development of genetics creates the possibility to acquire more and more information concerning our genetic constitution. In general this is considered as a contribution to the autonomy of patients and others. In this article it is pointed out that the relation between genetic information and autonomy is far from simple. The autonomy of people may even be threatened by genetic information. Counsellors should therefore be very careful in offering the opportunity of genetic testing; a general policy of restraint would be advisable. And when offering information, several considerations should be kept in mind in order to avoid doing more harm than good in the counseling process.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A K Huibers, A van 't Spijker. 1998. The autonomy paradox: predictive genetic testing and autonomy: three essential problems.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00083-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Disclosure and prevention of medical errors. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

Medical errors occur and are sometimes unavoidable. Physicians generally, but not always, have ethical and moral obligations to disclose their errors to the patient. Because common medical errors can be expected, physicians are obligated to work within health systems toward reducing systems flaws that promote errors. However, the obligations of physicians to disclose errors made by others are less clear. This article discusses the professional ethics involved in disclosing and preventing medical errors.

Ethics, Medical↗