PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9849236

Barriers to evidence-based practice.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper reports the findings of a study which aimed to identify the barriers to evidence-based practice in an acute National Health Service (NHS) trust. The study was carried out as part of an action research project designed to promote evidence-based practice. DESIGN: A rapid organizational appraisal design was used. This involved formal and informal interviews, focus groups, and observation of staff interactions at meetings and in clinical practice in an acute hospital NHS trust. Interviews were undertaken with key stakeholders within the organization and focus groups held with nurse managers, audit staff, staff nurses, and junior medical staff. Observation took place in meetings and in clinical areas. RESULTS: At an organizational level, the main issues identified were: (1) evidence-based practice was a low management priority, (2) problems with dissemination, (3) inadequate systems for personal and professional development, (4) difficulties in the management of innovations, (5) accessing evidence and resource constraints. At the individual practice level, the main issues were motivation, a lack of clarity about roles and practice, and a culture of practice which emphasizes 'routine' patient care. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that structures and cultures within organizations can be important barriers to evidence-based practice. Factors which are external to individual trusts are also important. Existing hierarchical structures both in the NHS and within and between the different professional groups, are manifest in the existence of a largely deferential culture which emphasizes the routine in practice decision making. Given this reality, organizations will have to adopt multiple strategies to facilitate and promote the use of evidence in practice decision making.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Newman, I Papadopoulos, J Sigsworth. 1998. Barriers to evidence-based practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0964-3397(98)80634-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗