PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9873918

A representation for mammographic image processing.

Abstract

Mammographic image analysis is typically performed using standard, general-purpose algorithms. We note the dangers of this approach and show that an alternative physics-model-based approach can be developed to calibrate the mammographic imaging process. This enables us to obtain, at each pixel, a quantitative measure of the breast tissue. The measure we use is h(int) and this represents the thickness of 'interesting' (non-fat) tissue between the pixel and the X-ray source. The thicknesses over the image constitute what we term the h(int) representation, and it can most usefully be regarded as a surface that conveys information about the anatomy of the breast. The representation allows image enhancement through removing the effects of degrading factors, and also effective image normalization since all changes in the image due to variations in the imaging conditions have been removed. Furthermore, the h(int) representation gives us a basis upon which to build object models and to reason about breast anatomy. We use this ability to choose features that are robust to breast compression and variations in breast composition. In this paper we describe the h(int) representation, show how it can be computed, and then illustrate how it can be applied to a variety of mammographic image processing tasks. The breast thickness turns out to be a key parameter in the computation of h(int), but it is not normally recorded. We show how the breast thickness can be estimated from an image, and examine the sensitivity of h(int) to this estimate. We then show how we can simulate any projective X-ray examination and can simulate the appearance of anatomical structures within the breast. We follow this with a comparison between the h(int) representation and conventional representations with respect to invariance to imaging conditions and the surrounding tissue. Initial results indicate that image analysis is far more robust when specific consideration is taken of the imaging process and the h(int) representation is used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Highnam, M Brady, B Shepstone. 1996. A representation for mammographic image processing.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(01)80002-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Dynamic MR examination of the breast--histological correlations].

The authors outline dynamic MR mammography (dMRM) as a highly sensitive diagnostic method for the examination of the breast. In a retrospective study relating to 84 processed cases, in the knowledge of the cytological-histological findings the diagnostic accuracy of the examinations was determined. The role of the method in detecting benign and malignant changes of the breast has been estimated. Misdiagnosed cases have been analysed and recommendations for the application of the method are included. The MR proved to be positive in 32 cases and negative in 3 cases of the analysed 35 malignant tumors. Benign lesions were found at microscopy in 49 cases, of which MR correctly diagnosed 40. The sensitivity and the specificity of dynamic MR mammography were 91% and 82%.

Breast Diseases

Ultrasound of the breast.

Breast ultrasound (US) has developed into an essential imaging modality for evaluation and management of the patient with breast symptoms or mammographic abnormalities. US is usually an adjunct to mammography and the clinical examination but in the young patient presenting with symptoms sonography may be the initial or sole imaging procedure. A screening role has not been established, but there may be a subset of high-risk patients for whom US will prove useful as a screening adjunct. Proper selection of equipment, careful attention to the technical aspects of scanning, and awareness of artifacts are necessary to avoid misinterpretation and to demonstrate subtle changes in breast architecture which indicate a malignancy. Thorough knowledge of the range of normal appearances of the breast and the alterations produced by breast disease are essential requisites for accurate evaluation and lesion characterization. Two of the most important clinical advances in breast US have been the development of criteria that allow improved benign/malignant differentiation of solid breast lesions and the use of US to guide interventional procedures. Other developments such as Doppler and contrast agents remain investigational.

Breast Diseases