PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9885923

Common errors in forensic pediatric pathology.

Abstract

Medicolegal autopsies in the pediatric age group occur with some frequency. Despite the time-honored and often quoted address by Professor Alan Moritz many years ago, which described mistakes in the forensic autopsy of adults, a comparable discussion of infants and children has not been forthcoming. In this review, ten categories of potential and actual errors are listed, some of which are similar to those given by Moritz. The smaller size of infants as well as their unique growth and development creates problems separate from those in adult autopsies and creates opportunities for mistakes in observation and interpretation. The thorough documentation of all findings, the gathering and proper storage of evidence, and the availability of essential materials (e.g., scene investigation data, complete medical records, all microscopic slides, total laboratory analyses--especially toxicology) help to preclude errors of both omission and commission.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Q Sturner. 1998. Common errors in forensic pediatric pathology.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199812000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The educational value of autopsy in a residency training program.

BACKGROUND: Historically, the autopsy has been an indispensable educational tool. Over the past several decades, however, the national autopsy rate has declined and the educational role of autopsy in modern medicine is being questioned. OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational value of autopsy attendance in an internal medicine residency program. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all autopsies performed on the general internal medicine teaching service between October 1996 and September 1998. Premortem and postmortem diagnoses were determined and compared and attending physician surveys were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight deaths occurred during the study period. Twenty-nine (33%) patients underwent autopsy. All autopsies were observed by the primary team and the attending physician completed an autopsy survey on each patient. An unexpected pathological diagnosis directly contributing to death was detected in 10 (34%) patients at autopsy. Additional unexpected pathological diagnoses were discovered in 23 (79%) cases. Attending physician surveys revealed that all 10 unexpected diagnoses contributing to death were observed by the primary team at the time of autopsy. Autopsy attendance was rated as a valuable educational experience in 27 cases (93%). CONCLUSION: Autopsy is a valuable educational tool and autopsy attendance should remain an integral part of internal medicine residency training.

Autopsy