PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9894751

Accreditation and certification.

Abstract

In Italy the debate has focused on three different assessment systems: accreditamento autorizzativo (regulatory accreditation), accreditamento di eccellenza (excellence accreditation), and certification. Regulatory accreditation verifies the conformance to a set of quality standards that entitle an organisation to the status of belonging to the NHS. Excellence accreditation attempts to maintain incremental improvement of the quality of services. Certification is a means by which an independent third party declares that a determined product or process conforms to the ISO 9000 set of standards; the main objective of certification is to increase the "credibility" of a company on the market in order to orient and at the same time assure customers. Certification loses meaning in a regulated market, as the Italian NHS, in which there is a distinction between the consumer and the paying body. Regulatory accreditation should be deeply rooted in regional planning; the recognition of accredited organisations should be the result of a demonstrated capacity to co-operate in achieving the goals of regional planning and not of conformance to organisational standards. Regional experiences of regulating accreditation show a high level of contamination between systems for quality assessment. The large number of standards proposed seemed to be redundant with respect to the aims that should be pursued by a regulating accreditation system. The furthering of quality in the NHS requires a complex system of quality assessment within which a plurality of subjects, each with different interests, work together to determine the final result by each one setting up procedures consistent with its own particular problems: the institutions set up regulatory accreditation and the professions develop excellence accreditation in their individual professional associations. What is important is to establish relationships across the various levels so as to give the whole system cohesion and consistency. (Int J Artif Organs

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M C Setti Bassanini. 1998. Accreditation and certification.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9894751/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[The major trends of the French accreditation process. A review of the first 182 reports published].

OBJECTIVES: To reply to the following questions: what is the status of the accreditation process and what are the general trends pointed out by the experts-visitors ? METHODS: A study was conducted on the 182 accreditation reports regarding health centres, published by the Anaes from June 2000 to July 2002. A reading scale was developed and data was registered in the database. Statistical analysis first described the hospitals (legal status, location, size, number of sites, presence or lack of technical devices, emergency units, and consultations) and then matched them with the specific parameters of the accreditation process (date of involvement, date of audit, date of the accreditation deliberation, number of experts and visitors and number and type of decisions. RESULTS: The results underlined the most frequent decisions among the 10 referentials of the accreditation process. The patients' case reports and the management of quality and prevention predominated. Recent French laws and the decision of the Anaes to apply these themes in their strategic orientation can explain this. COMMENTS: The large hospital size and multi-sites organisation appeared to be negative elements and justify the apprehension felt by the 'major hospitals'.

Accreditation↗