PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9919025

How do we define longevity?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Maggio. 1999. How do we define longevity?. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of resin composite components on glucosyltransferase of cariogenic bacterium.

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of resin composite components on glucan synthesis by glucosyltransferase (GTase) derived from a cariogenic bacterium, Streptococcus sobrinus B13. The eluates from cured composites stored in 0.05 mol/L potassium phosphate buffer (KPB) (pH 6.8) for 2 weeks at 37 degrees C stimulated the formation of water-insoluble glucan, whereas those from amalgam inhibited it. This finding suggests that the eluates from the resin composites enhance GTase activity and contribute to plaque formation. In the individual resin components, a diglycidyl methacrylate and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate significantly enhanced GTase activity. However, most polymerization inhibitors and accelerators were potent inhibitors of enzyme activity. Thus, GTase stimulation by eluates from resin composites is hypothesized to be heavily dependent on the effect of the eluated resin monomers, even though the other eluting components had inhibitory effects on GTase.

Composite Resins↗

Light-emitting diode (LED) polymerisation of dental composites: flexural properties and polymerisation potential.

The clinical performance of light polymerised dental composites is greatly influenced by the quality of the light-curing unit (LCU) used. Commonly used halogen LCUs have some specific drawbacks such as decreasing of the light output with time. This may result in low degree of monomer conversion of the composites with negative clinical implications. Previous studies have shown that blue-light-emitting diode (LED) LCUs have the potential to polymerise dental composites without having the drawbacks of halogen LCUs. Despite the relatively low irradiance of current LED LCUs, their efficiency is close to that of conventional halogen LCUs with more than twice the irradiance. This phenomenon has not been explained fully yet. Hence, more tests of the LED LCU's effectiveness and of the mechanical properties of oral biomaterials processed with LED LCUs need to be carried out. This study investigates the flexural properties of three different composites with three different shades, which were polymerised with either a commercial halogen LCU or an LED LCU, respectively. In most cases no significant differences in flexural strength and modulus between composites polymerised with a halogen LCU or an LED LCU, respectively, were found. A simple model for the curing effectiveness based on the convolution absorption spectrum of the camphorquinone photoinitiator present in composites and the emission spectra of the LCUs is presented.

Composite Resins↗

The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this descriptive study was to provide updated data on the teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in Europe as part of a survey of this aspect of the primary dental curriculum in Europe and North America. METHODS: Data on the teaching of posterior composite restorations and related matters were collected by means of a postal questionnaire sent to 185 dental schools known to exist in Europe. Non-respondents were sent a second questionnaire after two months. Further information pertaining to student requirements was sought after six months from all respondents. RESULTS: The response ranged from 92% for dental schools in Scandinavia to 40% from dental schools in Southern Europe with an overall response of 56%. All but four of the 104 participating schools were found to teach the use of composites in Class I and Class II, two-surface situations in at least premolar teeth. Contraindications and techniques taught for posterior composites varied within and between the country groupings of Northern and Central Europe. Scandinavia, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe. However, certain consensus views were identified. The experience of adverse biological reactions to the use of resin-based restoratives in European dental schools was found to be limited. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding the variation in the response from the four geographic regions investigated and the relatively low overall response to the questionnaire, it is concluded that the data reported indicates that most dental schools in Europe teach the use of composites in selected Class I and Class II situations. However, considerable variation exists both within and between the regions investigated in relation to this teaching. Further research and consensus conferences should be planned to reduce variability across Europe in relation to the contraindications and techniques taught for posterior composites.

Composite Resins↗