PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9929131

Techniques for measuring radiographic repeat rates.

Abstract

Radiographs that must be repeated, which are commonly referred to as "repeats," represent additional, non-billable costs due to increased film, chemistry, and equipment use as well as increased personnel time. Furthermore, patients receive additional radiation exposure from repeats and must remain on the premises until the second exam is completed. Compounding the overt negative financial impact on the department is an increased burden on the waiting room and support staff, and a decrease in patient throughput. A continuous improvement team was assigned to develop an improved technique for monitoring and reducing the number of repeated radiographs in a subset of our radiology department. This paper presents a novel method of accurately measuring the repeat rate through the use of radiographic repeat labels. The labels remove the guesswork from repeat analysis and heighten the technologists' awareness of common problems. Additionally, the labels allow for detailed analysis of the cause of repeated radiographs, which can provide insight for determining remedial actions. Repeat analysis data from our institution acquired using the labels before and after implementing remedial actions are presented.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Kofler, M L Mohlke, T J Vrieze. 1999. Techniques for measuring radiographic repeat rates.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199902000-00012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗