PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9929935

[Repeat kidney transplantation].

J Jirka·I Reneltová·P Rossmann·J Skibová·H Macurová·M Chadimová·S Vítko·I Matl·J Lácha·M Adamec·V Kocandrle
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was an analysis of results of repeated kidney transplantations (Tx2, Tx3) implemented during the first 29 years of activities of the Transplantation Centre of the Institute of the Clinical and Experimental Medicine in subjects with a different maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS AND RESULTS: The retrospective study pertains to 134 Tx2 and 17 Tx3 in 134 non-diabetic subjects: 43 of them had during Tx1 and Tx2 (1966-1981 and 1966-1985 resp.) immunosuppression on the basis of azathioprin (Aza, sub-group AA), 42 during Tx1 (1972-85), Aza, while during Tx2 (1984-85) immunosuppression on the basis of cyclosporin (CyA, subgroup AC) and 49 both during Tx1 and Tx2 (1985-93 and 1986-95 resp.) CyA (subgroup CC). Compared was survival of grafts by the actuarial method (with regard to all losses regardless of cause) by the end of the 4th year inside the subgroups (Tx2, vs. Tx1 and Tx3 vs. Tx2 in the same subjects) and between subgroups (Tx1 vs. Tx1 and Tx2 vs. Tx2 in different subjects). Moreover in paired investigations the survival of recipients and grafts after Tx2 was compared after immunosuppression on the basis of CyA with the same parameters after Tx1 in different subjects with the same immunosuppression, operated at approximately the same time (n = 81) and survival of subjects with Tx1 + Tx2 on the CC regime regardless whether the second grafts functioned at the time of the last examination, with survival of subjects after Tx1 where after graft failure Tx2 was not performed (n = 34). Prophylaxis with antilymphocyte globulins was not used. Survival of second and first grafts did not differ in any of the subgroups, third grafts survived at the end of the third year more frequently than second grafts (66 vs. 18%, p < 0.01). Second grafts in CC survived more than in AA (55 vs. 28%, p < 0.01). In the paired study Tx2 vs. Tx1 the survival of grafts and recipients was the same (88 vs. 89%, N.S. and 47 vs. 62% resp.), in the paired study Tx1 + Tx2 vs. Tx1 more subjects with Tx1 + Tx2 survived 10 years after Tx1 than subjects who did not have Tx2 (82 vs. 49%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A further transplantation of the kidney after functional loss of the first graft is the method of choice: the mortality is low, the probability of several years' function is considerable and the prognosis as regards quality and length of life better than with regular dialysis treatment.

Explore related subjects

AdultFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansKidney TransplantationMaleReoperationRetrospective StudiesEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Jirka, I Reneltová, P Rossmann, J Skibová, H Macurová, M Chadimová, S Vítko, I Matl, J Lácha, M Adamec, V Kocandrle. 1998-11-16. [Repeat kidney transplantation].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9929935/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

[Analysis of clinical phenotypes and pathogenicity of a c.4476+5G>T variant of SCN1A gene in a Chinese pedigree affected with Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the pathogenicity and characteristics of a heterozygous splicing variant of SCN1A gene in a Chinese pedigree affected with Genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data and results of genetic testing of a GEFS+ pedigree consisting of 5 members who had visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University on July 1, 2024. Pathogenicity of the splicing variant of the SCN1A gene was validated with a minigene splicing assay. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Ethics No.: KS-2018-KY-36). RESULTS: The proband, a 24-year-old female, presented with FS in conjunct with focal seizures, and both of her younger brothers had Dravet syndrome. All of the three patients had carried a c.4476+5G>T variant of the SCN1A gene, which was unreported previously. Minigene experiment verified that the variant could cause loss of the first 7 bps of exon 24 and 138 bps from exon 23 of the SCN1A gene, resulting in alteration p.V1447_1495delfs*6 and affecting splicing. Based on the guidelines from American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the variant was predicted as likely pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting). CONCLUSION: The c.4476+5G>T variant at an intronic site of the SCN1A gene probably underlay the pathogenesis of GEFS+ in this pedigree.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Polygenic risk scores and lifestyle factors predicting new onset of type 2 diabetes in the Japanese general population.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the association of polygenic risk scores (PRS) and lifestyle factors with type 2 diabetes mellitus development in Japanese populations and evaluated whether PRS can improve diabetes risk prediction beyond traditional risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study using the Shika resident cohort (n = 895) and the Toshiba worker cohort (n = 7019), respectively. Participants were categorized into low, intermediate, and high genetic risk groups using PRS constructed with genome-wide association study data from East Asian populations. We defined diabetes based on hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose, self-reported diagnosis, or medication use. The associations of PRS and lifestyle factors with diabetes development were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Higher PRS were associated with increased diabetes risk in both cohorts (resident cohort: odds ratio 4.51, 95% CI 2.53-8.04; worker cohort: hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.83 for high vs low PRS), which remained consistent across age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Regular exercise, absence of hypertension, and absence of dyslipidemia were associated with lower diabetes risk, particularly in the high PRS group. The addition of PRS to conventional prediction models improved the discrimination of diabetes risk. MAIN CONCLUSION: PRS are associated with diabetes risk in Japanese general populations, independent of traditional risk factors. Nonetheless, healthy lifestyle habits may reduce diabetes risk even among genetically susceptible individuals, which support the utility of PRS for personalized diabetes risk assessment and prevention strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of mitapivat in adults with transfusion-dependent &#x3b1;-thalassaemia or &#x3b2;-thalassaemia (ENERGIZE-T): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The absence of disease-modifying therapies for patients with &#x3b1;-thalassaemia and oral disease-modifying therapies for patients with &#x3b2;-thalassaemia has been a substantial unmet need in these patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of mitapivat, an oral allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase, in adults with transfusion-dependent thalassaemia. METHODS: ENERGIZE-T is a global, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, conducted across 19 countries in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East. Patients aged 18 years or older with transfusion-dependent &#x3b1;-thalassaemia or &#x3b2;-thalassaemia were randomly allocated (2:1) with a central interactive response technology system, stratified by geographical region and thalassaemia genotype, to receive 100 mg mitapivat or placebo orally twice a day for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was transfusion reduction response (TRR), defined as a reduction of at least 50% in transfused red blood cell units with a reduction of at least two units in any consecutive 12-week period until week 48 compared with baseline. Efficacy was analysed in the full analysis set, comprising all randomly allocated patients. Type, severity, and relationship of adverse events and serious adverse events were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04770779) and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Nov 30, 2021 and May 2, 2023, 305 patients were screened, of whom 258 were randomly allocated (median age 33&#xb7;5 years [IQR 27&#xb7;0-44&#xb7;0]; 136 [53%] female and 122 [47%] male participants). Of 258 patients allocated, 238 (92%) completed the double-blind treatment period. All patients were required to have a safety follow-up approximately 4 weeks after the final dose of study drug, regardless of completion of the double-blind period or continuation into the open-label extension period. In the full analysis set, TRRs occurred in 52 (30%) of 171 patients in the mitapivat group and 11 (13%) of 87 in the placebo group (adjusted difference 18 percentage points [95% CI 8-27]; two-sided p=0&#xb7;0003). The safety analysis set comprised 172 patients in the mitapivat group (including one patient allocated to the placebo group who received one dose of mitapivat in error) and 85 in the placebo group. Adverse events were reported in 155 (90%) patients treated with mitapivat and 71 (84%) treated with placebo; the most common events with mitapivat were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, initial insomnia, diarrhoea, and fatigue. Serious adverse events were reported in 19 (11%) patients treated with mitapivat and 13 (15%) treated with placebo. Ten (6%) patients who received mitapivat and one (1%) who received placebo discontinued study treatment due to adverse events. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Mitapivat significantly reduced the transfusion burden and was generally well tolerated, showing a favourable benefit-risk profile. These findings support mitapivat as the first oral disease-modifying therapy for adults with transfusion-dependent &#x3b1;-thalassaemia or &#x3b2;-thalassaemia, providing a new treatment option to reduce transfusion burden in this patient population. FUNDING: Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Adult↗