PubMed · 9950516
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
T Kombos, M Brock. 1999. Evoked potentials.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0376
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
During exercise, changes occur at many sites in the motor pathway, including the muscle fiber, motoneuron, motor cortex, and "upstream" of the motor cortex. Some of the changes result in fatigue, which can be defined as a decrease in ability to produce maximal muscle force voluntarily. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human motor cortex reveals changes in both motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the silent period during and after fatiguing voluntary contractions in normal subjects. The relationship of these changes to loss of force or fatigue is unclear. However, during a sustained maximal contraction TMS evokes extra force from the muscle and thus demonstrates the development of suboptimal output from the motor cortex, that is, fatigue at a supraspinal level. In some patients with symptoms of fatigue, the response to TMS after exercise is altered, but the changed MEP behavior is not yet linked to particular symptoms or pathology.
OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the globus pallidus internus or the subthalamic nucleus improves various components of postural and oromotor function and that some of the components correlate with changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Six patients with Parkinson's disease were evaluated for four postural and two orofacial UPDRS items, and quantitative tests of posture adjustments and oromotor control were performed while the patients were on and off DBS. Measurements of postural adjustments included reactive force and latency before a voluntary step. The oromotor assessments involved velocity and amplitude changes during voluntary jaw movement. RESULTS: DBS significantly improved the total UPDRS motor score by an average of 44%, which included improvement of 18 to 54% in the postural and orofacial items. DBS also decreased foot lift-off latency significantly, but it produced a variable response to the preparatory postural force in the swing limb. DBS significantly improved jaw-opening velocity by 14 to 50% and jaw opening amplitude by 5 to 41%. Significant correlations for the percentage change from off and on DBS occurred among a few UPDRS items and foot lift-off latency and jaw-opening velocities. CONCLUSION: DBS in either the globus pallidus internus or the subthalamic nucleus induces improvements in bradykinesia of specific components of postural and oromotor control, which also can be measured by the postural and orofacial UPDRS items. In some Parkinson's disease patients, DBS results in improvements in force or amplitude control, although these changes are not reflected in changes in UPDRS postural and orofacial items. A battery of quantitative and clinical tests must be used to evaluate the effects of DBS on axial motor control adequately.
These experiments were designed to investigate illusions of movements of the fingers produced by combined feedback from muscle spindle receptors and receptors located in different regions of the skin of the hand. Vibration (100 Hz) applied in cyclic bursts (4 s 'on', 4 s 'off') over the tendons of the finger extensors of the right wrist produced illusions of flexion-extension of the fingers. Cutaneous receptors were activated by local skin stretch and electrical stimulation. Illusory movements at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints were measured from voluntary matching movements made with the left hand. Localised stretch of the dorsal skin over specific MCP joints altered vibration-induced illusions in 8/10 subjects. For the group, this combined stimulation produced movement illusions at MCP joints under, adjacent to, and two joints away from the stretched region of skin that were 176 +/- 33, 122 +/- 9 and 67 +/- 11 % of the size of those from vibration alone, respectively. Innocuous electrical stimulation over the same skin regions, but not at the digit tips, also 'focused' the sensation of movement to the stimulated digit. Stretch of the dorsal skin and compression of the ventral skin around one MCP joint altered the vibration-induced illusions in all subjects. The illusions became more focused, being 295 +/- 57, 116 +/- 18 and 65 +/- 7 % of the corresponding vibration-induced illusions at MCP joints that were under, adjacent to, and two joints away from the stimulated regions of skin, respectively. These results show that feedback from cutaneous and muscle spindle receptors is continuously integrated for the perception of finger movements. The contribution from the skin was not simply a general facilitation of sensations produced by muscle receptors but, when the appropriate regions of skin were stimulated, movement illusions were focused to the joint under the stimulated skin. One role for cutaneous feedback from the hand may be to help identify which finger joint is moving.