PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Protein Structure, Tertiary”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Structural symmetry and protein function.

The majority of soluble and membrane-bound proteins in modern cells are symmetrical oligomeric complexes with two or more subunits. The evolutionary selection of symmetrical oligomeric complexes is driven by functional, genetic, and physicochemical needs. Large proteins are selected for specific morphological functions, such as formation of rings, containers, and filaments, and for cooperative functions, such as allosteric regulation and multivalent binding. Large proteins are also more stable against denaturation and have a reduced surface area exposed to solvent when compared with many individual, smaller proteins. Large proteins are constructed as oligomers for reasons of error control in synthesis, coding efficiency, and regulation of assembly. Symmetrical oligomers are favored because of stability and finite control of assembly. Several functions limit symmetry, such as interaction with DNA or membranes, and directional motion. Symmetry is broken or modified in many forms: quasisymmetry, in which identical subunits adopt similar but different conformations; pleomorphism, in which identical subunits form different complexes; pseudosymmetry, in which different molecules form approximately symmetrical complexes; and symmetry mismatch, in which oligomers of different symmetries interact along their respective symmetry axes. Asymmetry is also observed at several levels. Nearly all complexes show local asymmetry at the level of side chain conformation. Several complexes have reciprocating mechanisms in which the complex is asymmetric, but, over time, all subunits cycle through the same set of conformations. Global asymmetry is only rarely observed. Evolution of oligomeric complexes may favor the formation of dimers over complexes with higher cyclic symmetry, through a mechanism of prepositioned pairs of interacting residues. However, examples have been found for all of the crystallographic point groups, demonstrating that functional need can drive the evolution of any symmetry.

Allosteric Site↗
PubMed2001

The linkage between protein folding and functional cooperativity: two sides of the same coin?

During the course of their biological function, proteins undergo different types of structural rearrangements ranging from local to large-scale conformational changes. These changes are usually triggered by their interactions with small-molecular-weight ligands or other macromolecules. Because binding interactions occur at specific sites and involve only a small number of residues, a chain of cooperative interactions is necessary for the propagation of binding signals to distal locations within the protein structure. This process requires an uneven structural distribution of protein stability and cooperativity as revealed by NMR-detected hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments under native conditions. The distribution of stabilizing interactions does not only provide the architectural foundation to the three-dimensional structure of a protein, but it also provides the required framework for functional cooperativity. In this review, the statistical thermodynamic linkage between protein stability, functional cooperativity, and ligand binding is discussed.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

MD-2 and Der p 2 - a tale of two cousins or distant relatives?

MD-2, an LPS-binding protein is essential for the recognition of LPS by TLR4. MD-2 belongs to the ML superfamily of lipid-binding proteins. The tertiary structure of mite allergen protein Der p 2 was identified as having the protein fold most compatible with the sequence of MD-2. Comparison of MD-2 and Der p 2 reveals that they have many common biochemical characteristics: they are both rich in beta-structure and they are both very stable proteins as they both unfold only above 90 degrees C. In Der p 2, six cysteine residues form three disulfide bridges. We determined one free cysteine residue per recombinant biologically active MD-2 molecule, supporting similar disulfide topology with three disulfides bridges as in Der p 2. MD-2 binds LPS with high affinity; however, only weak binding of LPS was detected with Der p 2. Comparison of electrostatic potentials of the structural model of MD-2 and Der p 2 indicates a region of high positive potential on MD-2 and its absence in Der p 2, which may be the reason for its weak binding of LPS. We suggest that Der p 2 and its homologues probably do not have a role in response to Gram-negative bacteria in insects and that MD-2 family members with their specific role in innate immunity probably evolved from an ML ancestor only in higher vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

PhyloFacts: an online structural phylogenomic encyclopedia for protein functional and structural classification.

The Berkeley Phylogenomics Group presents PhyloFacts, a structural phylogenomic encyclopedia containing almost 10,000 'books' for protein families and domains, with pre-calculated structural, functional and evolutionary analyses. PhyloFacts enables biologists to avoid the systematic errors associated with function prediction by homology through the integration of a variety of experimental data and bioinformatics methods in an evolutionary framework. Users can submit sequences for classification to families and functional subfamilies. PhyloFacts is available as a worldwide web resource from http://phylogenomics.berkeley.edu/phylofacts.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Structural basis of caspase inhibition by XIAP: differential roles of the linker versus the BIR domain.

The inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) represent the only endogenous caspase inhibitors and are characterized by the presence of baculoviral IAP repeats (BIRs). Here, we report the crystal structure of the complex between human caspase-7 and XIAP (BIR2 and the proceeding linker). The structure surprisingly reveals that the linker is the only contacting element for the caspase, while the BIR2 domain is invisible in the crystal. The linker interacts with and blocks the substrate groove of the caspase in a backward fashion, distinct from substrate recognition. Structural analyses suggest that the linker is the energetic and specificity determinant of the interaction. Further biochemical characterizations clearly establish that the linker harbors the major energetic determinant, while the BIR2 domain serves as a regulatory element for caspase binding and Smac neutralization.

Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins↗
PubMed1992

Three-dimensional profiles for analysing protein sequence-structure relationships.

In the method of 3D (three-dimensional) profiles, each residue position in a protein is characterized by its environment and is represented by a row of 20 numbers in a table, the profile. These numbers are the statistical preferences (called 3D-1D scores) of each of the 20 amino acids for this environment. A profile is computed from the coordinates of a protein model, and it gives a score S for any amino acid sequence folded as the model. To date 3D profiles have found three applications. The first is to identify other protein sequences which are folded in the same general pattern as the structure from which the profile was prepared. These are sequences which have high scores for the profile computed from the model. The second is to assess the validity of protein models, however determined. Correct models are found to give profiles that have high scores for their own amino acid sequences, and incorrect models are found to have lower scores. The example of the X-ray structure determination of diphtheria toxin is discussed. The third application is to assess which is the stable oligomeric state of a folded protein. Several examples suggest that the highest profile score for a sequence is achieved when the protein is aggregated into its most stable oligomeric state.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Effect of a specific hydrogen bond (N138ND2-Q106O) on conformational integrity, stability, and activity of staphylococcal nuclease.

There are two hydrogen bonding interactions (N138ND2-Q106O and Y54OH-S141OG) between the C-terminal region and the main body of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase). To examine the role of these hydrogen bonds, SNase(141) and its three mutants, SNase(141)N138D, SNase(141)S141A, and SNase(141)N138D/S141A, were created. The N138D mutation has the N138ND2-Q106O interaction deleted and the S141A mutation has the Y54OH-S141OG and S141OG-N138O interactions deleted. The conformational features, stability, and activity of the proteins have been compared by using circular dichroism, intrinsic and ANS-binding fluorescence, GdnHCl-induced denaturation, and activity assay. The results clearly show that the N138D mutation significantly alters the secondary and tertiary structures of the protein, producing a partially unfolding state; in contrast, the S141A mutation has no such effect on structure. These results strongly suggest that the specific hydrogen bond, N138ND2-Q106O, plays an important role in maintaining the conformational integrity and stability of the nuclease.

Enzyme Activation↗
PubMed1995

Properties of Rab5 N-terminal domain dictate prenylation of C-terminal cysteines.

Rab5 is a Ras-related GTP-binding protein that is post-translationally modified by prenylation. We report here that an N-terminal domain contained within the first 22 amino acids of Rab5 is critical for efficient geranylgeranylation of the protein's C-terminal cysteines. This domain is immediately upstream from the "phosphate binding loop" common to all GTP-binding proteins and contains a highly conserved sequence recognized among members of the Rab family, referred to here as the YXYLFK motif. A truncation mutant that lacks this domain (Rab5(23-215) fails to become prenylated. However, a chimeric peptide with the conserved motif replacing cognate Rab5 sequence (MAYDYLFKRab5(23-215) does become post-translationally modified, demonstrating that the presence of this simple six amino acid N-terminal element enables prenylation at Rab5's C-terminus. H-Ras/Rab5 chimeras that include the conserved YXYLFK motif at the N-terminus do not become prenylated, indicating that, while this element may be necessary for prenylation of Rab proteins, it alone is not sufficient to confer properties to a heterologous protein to enable substrate recognition by the Rab geranylgeranyl transferase. Deletion analysis and studies of point mutants further reveal that the lysine residue of the YXYLFK motif is an absolute requirement to enable geranylgeranylation of Rab proteins. Functional studies support the idea that this domain is not required for guanine nucleotide binding since prenylation-defective mutants still bind GDP and are protected from protease digestion in the presence of GTP gamma S. We conclude that the mechanism of Rab geranylgeranylation involves key elements of the protein's tertiary structure including a conserved N-terminal amino acid motif (YXYLFK) that incorporates a critical lysine residue.

Alkyl and Aryl Transferases↗
PubMed1995

Rigid domains in proteins: an algorithmic approach to their identification.

A rigid domain, defined here as a tertiary structure common to two or more different protein conformations, can be identified numerically from atomic coordinates by finding sets of residues, one in each conformation, such that the distance between any two residues within the set belonging to one conformation is the same as the distance between the two structurally equivalent residues within the set belonging to any other conformation. The distance between two residues is taken to be the distance between their respective alpha carbon atoms. With the methods of this paper we have found in the deoxy and oxy conformations of the human hemoglobin alpha 1 beta 1 dimer a rigid domain closely related to that previously identified by Baldwin and Chothia (J. Mol. Biol. 129: 175-220, 1979). We provide two algorithms, both using the difference-distance matrix, with which to search for rigid domains directly from atomic coordinates. The first finds all rigid domains in a protein but has storage and processing demands that become prohibitively large with increasing protein size. The second, although not necessarily finding every rigid domain, is computationally tractable for proteins of any size. Because of its efficiency we are able to search protein conformations recursively for groups of non-intersecting domains. Different protein conformations, when aligned by superimposing their respective domain structures, can be examined for structural differences in regions complementing a rigid domain.

Algorithms↗