SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Manometry”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1994

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the value of preoperative anal manometry in predicting post-operative continence. METHODS: Anal manometry was performed in 73 consecutive patients before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery (m1), before loop ileostomy closure (m2), and at a follow-up of one (m3) and two (m4) years. Mean and maximum resting and squeezing pressures were documented at each occasion. One year after surgery, pressures were correlated (r) with an incontinence score. RESULTS: A significant (P < 0.05) decrease in mean resting pressures was observed after IPAA (m1 = 66 mmHg; m2 = 42.8 mmHg), followed by a significant (P < 0.05) improvement of mean resting pressure after loop ileostomy closure (m3 = 53.8 mmHg; m4 = 54.7 mmHg). Mean squeezing pressures did not change (P > 0.05) at any time during the study (m1 = 114 mmHg; m2 = 102.9 mmHg; m3 = 103.4 mmHg; m4 = 95.8 mmHg). There was no correlation between preoperative mean resting pressure and postoperative (mI) incontinence score. CONCLUSION: Anal manometry showed a characteristic trend in internal anal sphincter injury after IPAA followed by recovery after ileostomy closure. However, it failed to prove helpful in the prediction of clinical outcome. Thus, although this study supports the continued use of manometry in a research setting, it challenges the value of routine manometry in a clinical context.

Anal Canal↗

PubMed1990

Stationary vs. mapping manometry in evaluating dysphagia.

Two methods are used to assess esophageal motility. The mapping technique uses catheter withdrawal at 1 cm steps until the entire esophagus is evaluated. A simpler method is commonly used that involves keeping the catheter stationary for the entire evaluation. We compared these 2 techniques in 30 patients referred for the evaluation of dysphagia. Emphasis was placed on the distal 10 cm of the esophagus because this is the primary location of esophageal motility disorders. There was excellent correlation between techniques for mean distal amplitude (r = 0.945), mean distal duration (r = 0.942), and percentage of non-peristaltic contractions (r = 0.967). The overall manometry diagnosis was similar by both methods in 27 (90%) patients. Three patients had different manometry diagnoses resulting from use of the two techniques. However, the change in diagnosis was only clinically important in one patient in whom the mapping technique identified a segmental motility disorder that had been missed by the stationary technique. Stationary manometry had a 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity rate for identifying motility disorders compared to mapping manometry. We conclude that stationary manometry is a simple and accurate method for evaluating esophageal pressures and distal disorders. Only those patients with normal results of stationary studies may benefit by further mapping to identify rare segmental motility disorders.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1988

Sphincter of Oddi manometry: comparison of microtransducer and perfusion methods.

There are two approaches to endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry, the microtransducer method and the perfusion method. Data reported by us and others are reviewed, with the aim of comparing the two techniques. Biliary pressure, pancreatic duct pressure, and sphincter of Oddi phasic wave activity can be measured by both of these methods. Easy handling and the capability of recording the mode of phasic wave propagation with a multilumen catheter are present advantages of perfusion manometry over the microtransducer method. Because there is no need for perfusion of fluid, the equipment needed for microtransducer manometry is simpler than that needed for the perfusion method, and the microtransducer technique may be more suitable for prolonged recording. An inter-study comparison of manometric data is easier with microtransducer manometry, but must await the collection of more data. Manometric differences between various diseases are still inconsistent, whereas there is no question of the effect of sphincterotomy on pressure values, with the exception of pancreatic duct and sphincter pressures. The possibilities of diagnosing sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and of predicting the response to sphincterotomy have been received with enthusiasm. However, whether the findings obtained by endoscopic manometry over relatively short periods of time can be considered representative of overall sphincter function is now being questioned since the presence of physiologic cyclic changes in sphincter of Oddi phasic activity in phase with the migrating motor complex of the duodenum was demonstrated. Hormonal or pharmacological stimulation of sphincter activity may help us overcome this problem.

Ampulla of Vater↗

PubMed1984

Early changes in oesophageal function in progressive systemic sclerosis: a comparison of manometry and radiology.

The characteristics of oesophageal dysfunction were studied with manometry and cine radiography in a recumbent position in 21 patients with typical progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS). Manometry was also performed in a matched control group. Only one patient had a completely normal manometry. Mean resting pressure in both the upper and lower oesophageal sphincters were significantly decreased in PSS. Twelve patients had no detectable peristalsis in the lower oesophagus. In the upper oesophagus, the mean pressure amplitude of the peristalitic wave was found to be lower than normal in all patients with detectable peristalsis. In some patients, the only feature of oesophageal dysfunction observed was an increased speed of the peristaltic wave in the middle and lower oesophagus. This is interpreted as an impaired coordination of the propulsive peristalsis. Neuromuscular dysfunction of the oesophagus in its full length was thus clearly demonstrated. At cine radiography, three patients were judged as normal, and 13 patients had severe impairment of the peristaltic function in the distal two-thirds of oesophagus. Oesophageal scoring based on manometry correlated well to scoring based on radiography. Cine radiography of the recumbent patient gives adequate information for clinical purposes. Detection of early changes in the amplitude and speed of the propagation wave requires manometry.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

[Follow-up study of patients with achalasia treated by long myotomy + partial fundopexy + posterior fixation based on intraoperative manometry].

Long myotomy (6-8 cm) + partial fundopexy + posterior fixation with intraoperative manometry of the esophagus was performed in 23 cases of esophageal achalasia. These cases ranged from 24-72 years of age (average 42), 11 were males and 12 females. There were 19 primary cases and 4 postoperative cases of recurrence, and the period of their clinical courses ranged from 2 months to 23 years. Concerning the operative procedure, in 22 cases the approach was via an upper midline incision and 1 case the approach was via left thoraco-abdominal incision. Intraoperative manometry was performed to help in judging the extent of each manipulation. With the operative manipulation, the LESP is reduced to 13.0 +/- 6.0 mmHg (39% of the average preoperative value) and HPZ is elongated to 60.9 +/- 14.1 mm (155% of the average preoperative value). Moreover, post-operative manometry data resembled intra-operative data. The effectiveness of the procedure is judged on the basis of the chief complaints, esophagography, endoscopic examination, esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring. Patients are followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year from the operation. Results showed 22 excellent cases (96.65%), 1 fair case (4.34%). These are better results than those of other reports that showed 50-60% excellent results and 30% good results (remaining slight passage disturbance). The reason for this difference is that we obtain sufficient LESP decompression effect (myotomy + submucosal layer ablation) based on intraoperative manometry. In the only case that we judged as fair (a reoperated case after Heller's operation) showed severe EGR totalling 213 min. on 24-hr pH monitoring of the esophagus in the postoperative period and was erosion also seen in the lower esophagus endoscopically. In this case, the LESP was 6.0 mmHg and its HPZ is 27.0 mm, showing a higher HPZ than the non-reflux group. Among the non-reflux group, LESP was as low as 6.0 mmHg, and this case had a remarkable long HPZ of 57.0 mm. In conclusion, even though the LESP is low, it is possible to prevent reflux if the HPZ is sufficiently long.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motor disorders and noncardiac chest pain.

Standard manometry is currently considered the gold standard for the classification of esophageal motor disorders. We compared the new technique of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring to standard manometry in 108 patients thought to have a primary esophageal motor disorder, assessed the esophageal motor pattern associated with spontaneous noncardiac chest pain, and studied the effect of long esophageal myotomy on circadian esophageal motor function. Standard manometry was found to frequently overestimate and underestimate the severity of esophageal motor abnormalities as compared to 24-hour monitoring. Ambulatory manometry showed a direct correlation of abnormal esophageal motor activity with episodes of noncardiac chest pain in 13 of 26 patients who experienced the symptom during the monitoring period. The abnormal motor activity immediately preceding the pain episodes in these patients was characterized by an increased frequency of simultaneous, double and triple-peaked, high amplitude, and long duration contractions (p less than 0.01). Long esophageal myotomy markedly reduced or eliminated the ability of the esophagus to produce these abnormal contractions (p less than 0.01). These data suggest that ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring allows more precise classification of esophageal motor disorders than standard manometry and identifies abnormal esophageal motor activity associated with noncardiac chest pain that can be abated by long esophageal myotomy.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

The usefulness of small-bowel manometry in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Motility disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract have traditionally been diagnosed by excluding mechanical small-bowel obstruction. In order to diagnose GI motility disorders in a positive fashion, small-bowel manometry was performed on 15 patients who were referred to the authors with intestinal motility disorders. Intestinal manometry was performed after first positioning a 200-cm multilumen tube into the small intestine. Ports located at 10-cm intervals were perfused with sterile water and connected to pressure transducers to record intraluminal pressures with a multichannel chart recorder. This low compliance water perfusion manometry system allowed examination of both fasting and postprandial motility. Intestinal manometry was able to assist in the diagnosis of two patients that had true mechanical small-bowel obstruction. One patient had a stenosis of the gastrojejunostomy and three patients had a functional gastric outlet obstruction secondary to a motility disorder in the Roux limb. One patient had a functional obstruction from a reversed jejunal loop and eight patients were identified as having intestinal pseudo-obstruction. We found intestinal manometry was a helpful adjunct in the diagnosis of GI motility disorders.

Adult↗

PubMed1984

[Japan Study Group of Manometry of Digestive Tract in Childhood].

The Japan Study Group of Manometry of the Digestive Tract in Childhood was organized in 1975. The 14th meeting was held in February 1984. During the meeting, the technique of anorectal manometry was established and the criteria of positive recto-anal reflex was defined. The mechanism of recto-anal reflex has been studied, but the details of it remain obscure. The relationship between postoperative fecal continence and the findings of anorectal manometry of patients with anorectal disorders are currently being investigated. It is in dispute whether the recto-anal reflex is present or absent in patients with pseudo-Hirschsprung's disease. Study of esophageal manometry in children was added to the work of the group in 1978, and gastroesophageal reflux has been studied using manometry and/or pH measurement.

Child↗

PubMed1994

Simultaneous videoradiography and computerized pharyngeal manometry--videomanometry.

To obtain more information about muscle function in patients with dysphagia, simultaneous barium swallow and computerized pharyngeal manometry with solid-state pressure transducers was employed for the evaluation of the pharynx and the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) in 30 consecutive patients. The manometry catheter was positioned under fluoroscopic control, providing localized measurements of the intraluminal pressures in the pharynx. Sixteen patients had a normal barium swallow. In 5 (31%) of these the manometry disclosed PES dysfunction, i.e. increased resting pressures between swallows in 3 patients (mean 120 +/- 13 mm Hg), and increased contraction pressures during peristalsis in 2 (mean 297 +/- 21 mm Hg). Barium swallow and manometry are complementary: the former reflecting transport through the pharynx and penetration to the airways, the latter the intraluminal pressures created by the pharyngeal wall. The combination of barium swallow and manometry gives information about pressure in relation to bolus transport, which may elucidate pharyngeal dysfunction.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

How safe is endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry?

The safety of endoscopic manometry of the sphincter of Oddi was evaluated in a prospective survey of 158 consecutive procedures in 126 patients with either unexplained pain after cholecystectomy or idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. The only complication was that of pancreatitis which was defined as the development of abdominal pain in association with a plasma amylase above the reference range. This occurred in 13 patients (8%) and was more frequent (P = 0.001) when the indication for the procedure was idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (29%) than unexplained pain (6%). Pancreatitis was also more frequent (P = 0.02) in patients with abnormal manometry (14%) than in those with normal manometry (3%) and occurred at highest frequency (50%) in a subgroup of patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis and sphincter stenosis (high sphincter basal pressure). All episodes of pancreatitis were mild with a median increase in hospital stay of 2 days; no patients died. The risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic manometry is relatively low but increases in patients with abnormal sphincter manometry, particularly those with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed1986

Acetylcholinesterase and manometry in the diagnosis of the constipated child.

We studied 309 constipated infants and children who underwent rectal manometry (n = 261) and/or punch rectal biopsy, in which acetylcholinesterase histochemistry (n = 124) was compared with routine histologic examination (n = 93) for diagnostic accuracy. A 99% diagnostic accuracy was achieved with acetylcholinesterase histochemistry compared with 61% accuracy with routine hematoxylin-eosin staining on punch rectal biopsy. We recommend screening cooperative, quiet patients with rectal manometry. Most patients with abnormal manometric studies or those on whom manometry cannot be performed should have superficial punch biopsy (except those ill infants who require urgent operative intervention). This plan of management provides the least invasive but the most accurate evaluation of the constipated child. Deep rectal biopsy can be avoided except in the very rare child with hypoganglionosis or "skip-area" aganglionosis, which can be detected by manometry.

Acetylcholinesterase↗

PubMed1989

Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease by anorectal manometry.

Anorectal manometry was performed in 48 Japanese children with Hirschsprung's disease and 61 normal children. The resting pressure of the rectum and anal canal was not significantly different between these groups of subjects. The frequency of rhythmical contractions of the anal canal of patients was significantly lower than for the normal subjects, but the frequencies overlapped considerably. Therefore, the frequency is an inadequate indicator for identifying these patients. Conventional manometry elicited a distinct rectoanal relaxation reflex from 90% of the normal children, and the rate increased to 98% when indistinct reflexes were regarded as positive. Indistinct reflexes often occur in neonates, possibly because the constriction of the anal canal is weak. However, when prostaglandin F2 alpha was intravenously administered during the examination, all ambiguous reflexes became distinct. Of patients with Hirschsprung's disease, 4% had a distinct reflex and 19% an atypical one. Most of the atypical reflexes were regarded as being artifacts and were mostly attributed to distension by a balloon. In these patients, the reflex was abolished in case of examination with electric stimulation or stimulation with cold water, procedures which do not dilate the rectum. Moreover these atypical reflexes did not fit the criteria for the normal rectoanal relaxation reflex prepared by the Japan Study Group of Pediatric Intestinal Manometry. The use of electric stimulation, cold water, or intravenously administered prostaglandin F2 alpha improves reliability of the conventional anorectal manometry. A clear and accurate definition of the normal reflex should aid in excluding the atypical reflex.

Anal Canal↗

PubMed1992

Antroduodenal manometry. Usefulness and limitations as an outpatient study.

We performed fasting and postprandial recordings of antroduodenal manometry in 21 normal volunteers, 13 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and gastrointestinal symptoms, and 11 patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. None of the patients or volunteers had previously undergone an intestinal intubation study. Recordings could not be obtained from four of the diabetic patients due to failure to intubate the pylorus. Catheter migration led to incomplete antral data in a further 21% of all recordings. Due to the wide variations demonstrated by the normal volunteers, parameters of either the migrating motor complex (MMC) or the fed response could not differentiate between either of the patient groups and/or the controls. Similarly, while abnormal patterns of either fasting or postprandial motility were common in the diabetic patients, manometry had a sensitivity of only 67% in comparison to the less invasive radionuclide gastric emptying study. Furthermore, manometry failed to identify any diagnostic abnormality in irritable bowel patients; in particular, the incidence of "clustered" contractions was similar in all three groups. We conclude that short duration antroduodenal manometry is of limited diagnostic usefulness due to the difficulties in pyloric intubation in the presence of a dilated stomach and the intrinsic variability in normal motor patterns, perhaps excerbated by the stressful effects of the procedure itself in tube-naive subjects.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Comparison of esophageal manometry, provocative testing, and ambulatory monitoring in patients with unexplained chest pain.

Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitors are being developed to evaluate noncardiac chest pain. This new technology needs comparison with conventional esophageal tests before determining which studies are most useful in diagnosing and treating esophageal chest pain. Therefore, we studied 45 patients with esophageal manometry, acid perfusion and edrophonium tests, and 24 hr pH and pressure monitoring. Manometry was abnormal in 20 patients (44%) with nutcracker esophagus, the most common motility disorder. Fifteen (33%) had positive acid perfusion test and 24 (55%) positive edrophonium test. During ambulatory monitoring, all patients experienced chest pain with a total of 202 individual events: 32 events (15%) secondary to acid reflux, 15 (7%) secondary to motility abnormalities, 7 (3%) to both pH and pressure changes, and 149 events (74%) occurred in the absence of any abnormal pH or motility changes. Patients with normal manometry were significantly (P less than 0.01) more likely to have acid reflux chest pain events than did nutcracker patients, who had an equal frequency of pH and motility events. A positive acid perfusion test was significantly associated with abnormal pressure events (P = 0.02; odds ratio 5.95), while a positive edrophonium test more likely predicted acid reflux chest pain during 24-hr monitoring (P = 0.007; odds ratio 7.25). Therefore, abnormal manometry and positive provocative tests point to the esophagus as the likely source of chest pain. However, ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring are required to accurately define the relationship between chest pain and acid reflux or motility disorders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Chest Pain↗

PubMed1992

Diagnosis of esophageal motor disorders: a prospective study comparing barium swallow, food barium mixture, and continuous swallows with manometry.

Radiography and manometry of the esophagus were compared in 77 patients consecutively referred for manometric investigation on suspicion of esophageal motility disorder. Radiography and manometry were carried out simultaneously, and the results were assessed blindly. The examination comprised barium swallow, bread barium swallow, and barium swilling. Considering manometry as the standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the radiologic examinations were 90.4% and 92.0%, respectively. We conclude that radiology is an excellent investigation for the separation of patients with and without esophageal motility disorders, but correct subclassification often required manometry.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1990

Transducer manometry and the effect of body position on anal canal pressures.

Anal canal manometry is performed conventionally with balloons, sleeves, perfused or nonperfused open-tipped catheters, or with multiport probes. The authors constructed a new manometer with four transducers embedded in a probe (15 mm outside diameter) and oriented radially, 90 degrees apart. The transducer probe was validated in 27 healthy volunteers by comparing its performance to that of a standard four-port perfused manometer and then used to measure anal canal and rectal pressures in body positions more physiologic (standing, sitting) than that usually employed (left lateral) for such measurements. Both devices measured similar anal canal resting pressure in the left lateral position (mid canal, 58 +/- 3 mm Hg perfused vs. 62 +/- 4 mm Hg transducer; P greater than 0.05). The transducer probe, however, recorded higher squeeze pressures (mid canal, 100 +/- 6 mm Hg perfused vs. 143 +/- 14 mm Hg transducer; P less than 0.05). The transducer probe detected higher intrarectal and resting anal canal pressures when subjects were standing or sitting, compared with the left lateral position (rectum, 3 +/- 1 mm Hg left lateral; 17 +/- 2 mm Hg standing; 20 +/- 1 mm Hg sitting; P less than 0.05; mid anal canal, 57 +/- 3 mm Hg left lateral; 86 +/- 4 mm Hg standing; 81 +/- 5 mm Hg sitting, P less than 0.05). The rise in resting anal canal pressure was uniform circumferentially. Neither anal canal length nor squeeze pressure changed with change in position. The authors concluded that 1) transducer manometry recorded similar resting but higher squeeze pressures compared with perfused manometry; 2) transducer manometry recorded the same radial variation in anal canal resting and squeeze pressures as that recorded by the perfused manometer; and 3) standing and sitting caused a four-fold rise in intrarectal pressure, which was associated with a concomitant rise in resting anal canal pressure.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction following liver transplantation. Screening by bedside manometry and definitive manometric evaluation.

Although sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) has been extensively studied in the nontransplant setting, the diagnostic criteria after liver transplantation are not well defined and have been based on clinical features without manometric documentation. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the manometric patterns associated with SOD following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and (2) to define the usefulness of bedside T-tube manometry as a screening tool for SOD. ERCP with simultaneous manometry of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) was performed in five patients following OLT with choledochocholedochostomy (CDCD) between 1990 and 1992. The diagnosis of SOD was suspected based on persistently elevated liver function tests, distal common bile duct dilatation in the absence of strictures, and an elevated resting bile duct pressure as measured by bedside T-tube manometry. Two different manometric patterns of SOD were observed. The first pattern (N = 4) consisted of elevated SO basal pressures, infrequent simultaneous phasic activity, and an abnormal response to cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-OP). The second pattern (N = 1) consisted of low basal pressures and absent phasic activity. Four patients were successfully treated with papillotomy and stenting, while the fifth patient required conversion to a choledochojejunostomy because of a concomitant anastomotic stricture. The abnormal SO manometric profiles in patients suspected of having SOD after OLT were different from those observed in the nontransplant setting. Bedside T-tube manometry allowed measurement of the resting bile duct pressure and may be a useful screening tool for SOD.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Combined anorectal manometry and defecography in 50 consecutive adults with fecal incontinence.

Fifty consecutive patients presenting with fecal incontinence were evaluated prospectively with anorectal manometry, defecography, and other tests of anorectal function to assess the clinical utility of defecography in fecal incontinence. Leakage of contrast at rest and failure to narrow the anorectal angle with pelvic squeezing were specific but not sensitive predictors of decreased sphincter pressures as determined by manometry. Thus, after manometry, defecography provided no additional information regarding sphincter strength. Retention of contrast in large rectoceles or incomplete rectal evacuation at defecography had excellent correlation with the presence of clinical symptoms of outlet obstruction constipation (present concurrently with incontinence) and indicated an etiology of outlet obstruction symptoms. Defecography may provide useful information in incontinent patients with outlet obstruction constipation symptoms but has little additive value to anorectal manometry in incontinent patients without such symptoms.

Adult↗