PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA, Small Untranslated”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Up-regulation of vaults may be necessary but not sufficient for multidrug resistance.

Vaults are ribonucleoprotein complexes comprised of the 100 kDa major vault protein (MVP), the 2 high m.w. vault proteins p193 (VPARP) and p240 (TEP1) and an untranslated small RNA (vRNA). Increased levels of MVP, vault-associated vRNA and vaults have been linked directly to non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR). To further characterize the putative role of vaults in MDR, expression levels of all of the vault proteins were examined in various MDR cell lines. Subcellular fractionation of vault particles revealed that all 3 vault proteins are increased in MDR cells compared to the parental, drug-sensitive cells. Furthermore, protein analysis of subcellular fractions of the drug-sensitive, MVP-transfected AC16 cancer cell line indicated that vault levels are increased, in this stable line. Since TEP1 is shared by both vaults and the telomerase complex, TEP1 protein (and vault) levels were compared with telomerase activity in a variety of cell lines, including various MDR lines. Our studies demonstrate that while vault levels may be a good predictor of drug resistance, their up-regulation alone is not sufficient to confer the drug-resistant phenotype. This implies a requirement of an additional factor(s) for vault-mediated MDR.

Carrier Proteins↗

Detection of mitochondrial tDRs in killifish embryos and other non-model organisms.

In recent years a diversity of small noncoding RNAs have been identified that originate from the mitochondrial genome. These mitosRNAs are often dominated by tRNA-derived small RNAs (mito-tDRs). Differential expression of mito-tDRs is associated with responses to stress. They also appear to be expressed differentially during development and their expression may be enriched in stress-tolerant animals. Very little is currently known about roles or modes of action of these sequences, although they are implicated in a diversity of processes such as cell cycle regulation, mRNA stability, regulation of ROS production, and import of proteins into the mitochondrion. To better understand the various roles these sequences may play, it is critical that we understand their diversity, cellular location, and the context for their expression. This protocol outlines the methodologies used to detect mitosRNAs, including mito-tDRs, in embryos and cells of the annual killifish Austrofundulus limnaeus. We highlight critical steps in the isolation of RNA, creation of sequencing libraries, bioinformatics processing of sequence data, and methods for validation of expression that support a robust discovery pipeline for mitosRNAs even from species with incomplete reference genome sequences.

Animals↗

Functional effects of variants of the RNA chaperone Hfq.

The ring-shaped RNA chaperone Hfq has recently received much attention owing to its multiple roles in RNA metabolism. In this study we have performed a mutational analysis of the Escherichia coli hfq gene, and have studied the effects of amino acid substitutions at several positions in the Hfq protein as well as of C-terminal truncations on its role in phage Qbeta replication, in repression of a target mRNA, and on the stability of the small regulatory RNA DsrA. These functional studies provided insights into the interaction of Hfq with RNA and suggested a role for the C-terminus of Hfq in DsrA stability.

Allolevivirus↗

Interactions of ribosomal protein S1 with DsrA and rpoS mRNA.

Ribosomal protein S1 is shown to interact with the non-coding RNA DsrA and with rpoS mRNA. DsrA is a non-coding RNA that is important in controlling expression of the rpoS gene product in Escherichia coli. Photochemical crosslinking, quadrupole-time of flight tandem mass spectrometry, and peptide sequencing have identified an interaction between DsrA and S1 in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Purified S1 binds both DsrA (K(obs) approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) and rpoS mRNA (K(obs) approximately 3 x 10(7) M(-1)). Ribonuclease probing experiments indicate that S1 binding has a weak but detectable effect on the secondary structure of DsrA or rpoS mRNA.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Epstein-Barr virus: inhibition of apoptosis as a mechanism of cell transformation.

Epstein-Barr virus is a potent mitogen for human B lymphocytes and is associated with a large number of human malignancies. This large virus expresses several genes that may contribute to the transformed phenotype of infected cells and it possesses multiple strategies for the inhibition of apoptosis. The interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR is an important target for the anti-apoptotic actions of the virus and its activity is regulated by the small untranslated RNA, EBER-1. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action of EBER-1 and other Epstein-Barr virus gene products in the regulation of apoptosis, and presents a model of how EBER-1 exerts its effects on PKR activity.

Apoptosis↗

Functional dissection of sRNA translational regulators by nonhomologous random recombination and in vivo selection.

Small nontranslated RNAs (sRNAs) regulate a variety of biological processes. DsrA and OxyS are two E. coli sRNAs that regulate the translation of rpoS, which encodes a protein sigma factor. Due to their structural complexity, the functional dissection of sRNAs solely by designing and assaying mutants can be challenging. Here, we present a complementary approach to the study of functional RNAs, in which highly diversified RNA libraries are generated by nonhomologous random recombination (NRR) and processed efficiently by in vivo selections that link RNA activities to cell survival. When applied to DsrA and OxyS, this approach rapidly identified essential and nonessential regions of both sRNAs. Resulting hypotheses about DsrA and OxyS structure-function relationships were tested and further refined experimentally. Our findings demonstrate an efficient, unbiased approach to the functional dissection of nucleic acids.

Base Sequence↗

Concert of regulators to switch on LEE expression in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7: interplay between Ler, GrlA, HNS and RpoS.

Enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteropathogenic (EPEC) Escherichia coli strains carry a pathogenicity island termed locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) responsible for attaching and effacing lesions on epithelial cells. The expression of LEE varies among isolates and is dependent on environmental cues. In the EHEC O157:H7 Sakaï isolate (RIMD-0509952 strain), we found that the non-coding RNA, DsrA, activates the expression of the LEE. This activation requires RpoS, the stress sigma factor. The DsrA/RpoS regulatory pathway mediates its positive effect by stimulating the transcription of ler, a positive regulatory gene encoded by the LEE. A second regulatory pathway, repressed by HNS, is also able to activate the transcription of ler and requires GrlA, another LEE-encoded regulator. Both regulatory pathways, DsrA/RpoS and HNS/GrlA, affect the activity of the ler distal promoter and require the Ler protein to be functional. Our data demonstrate that the LEE expression can be turned on by at least two separate pathways acting on the transcription of ler.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Cycling of the Sm-like protein Hfq on the DsrA small regulatory RNA.

Small RNAs (sRNAs) regulate bacterial genes involved in environmental adaptation. This RNA regulation requires Hfq, a bacterial Sm-like protein that stabilizes sRNAs and enhances RNA-RNA interactions. To understand the mechanism of target recognition by sRNAs, we investigated the interactions between Hfq, the sRNA DsrA, and its regulatory target rpoS mRNA, which encodes the stress response sigma factor. Nuclease footprinting revealed that Hfq recognized multiple sites in rpoS mRNA without significantly perturbing secondary structure in the 5' leader that inhibits translation initiation. Base-pairing with DsrA, however, made the rpoS ribosome binding site fully accessible, as predicted by genetic data. Hfq bound DsrA four times more tightly than the DsrA.rpoS RNA complex in gel mobility-shift assays. Consequently, Hfq is displaced rapidly from its high-affinity binding site on DsrA by conformational changes in DsrA, when DsrA base-pairs with rpoS mRNA. Hfq accelerated DsrA.rpoS RNA association and stabilized the RNA complex up to twofold. Hybridization of DsrA and rpoS mRNA was optimal when Hfq occupied its primary binding site on free DsrA, but was inhibited when Hfq associated with the DsrA.rpoS RNA complex. We conclude that recognition of rpoS mRNA is stimulated by binding of Hfq to free DsrA sRNA, followed by release of Hfq from the sRNA.mRNA complex.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis compensates asymmetric contact distribution by cooperative binding.

Carbon catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis is carried out mainly by the major regulator CcpA. In contrast, sugar-dependent repression of three genes, sr1 encoding a small untranslated RNA, and two genes, gapB and pckA, coding for gluconeogenic enzymes is mediated by the recently identified transcriptional repressor CcpN. Since previous DNase I footprinting yielded only basic information on the operator sequences of CcpN, chemical interference footprinting studies were performed for a precise contact mapping. Methylation interference, potassium permanganate and hydroxylamine footprinting were used to identify all contacted residues in both strands in the three operator sequences. Furthermore, ethylation interference experiments were performed to identify phosphate residues essential for CcpN binding. Here, we show that each operator has two binding sites for CcpN, one of which was always contacted more strongly than the other. The three sites that exhibited close contacts were very similar in sequence, with only a few slight variations, whereas the other three corresponding sites showed several deviations. Gel retardation assays with purified CcpN demonstrated that the differences in contact number and strength correlated well with significantly different K(D) values for the corresponding single binding sites. However, quantitative DNase I footprinting of whole operator sequences revealed cooperative binding of CcpN that, apparently, compensated the asymmetric contact distribution. Based on these data, possible consequences for the repression mechanism of CcpN are discussed.

Bacterial Proteins↗

The genomic sequence of the murine major vault protein and its promoter.

Vaults are ribonucleoproteins of unknown function, consisting of three different proteins and multiple copies of small untranslated RNA molecules. One of the protein subunits has been identified as TEP1, a protein that is also associated with the telomerase complex. Another protein appears to contain a functional PARP domain and is hence called VPARP. The third protein, major vault protein (MVP), is believed to make up 70% of the total mass of the vault complex and to be responsible for the typical barrel-shaped structure of vaults. We have isolated the murine MVP cDNA and compared the amino acid sequence with MVP from other species. Over 90% of sequence identity was found between mouse, human and rat, and a considerable degree of identity between mouse and MVPs from lower eukaryotes. We also found that the genomic structure of the murine MVP gene closely resembles the organization of the human MVP gene, both consisting of 15 exons of which most have exactly the same size. Finally we have isolated a genomic region upstream (and partially overlapping) the first untranslated exon, that displayed promoter activity in a luciferase reporter assay. Furthermore, we showed that the sequences from the first exon together with the 5'-end of the first intron enhance the promoter activity, implying the presence of essential promoter elements in this region. Alignment of the murine promoter region with the homologous sequences of the human gene revealed an identity of 58%. The apparent presence of conserved promoter elements suggests a similar regulation of human and murine MVP expression.

Animals↗

Escherichia coli Hfq binds A18 and DsrA domain II with similar 2:1 Hfq6/RNA stoichiometry using different surface sites.

Hfq is a RNA-binding protein in Escherichia coli that plays an essential role in post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by facilitating pairing of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) to mRNA target sites. Recent work has provided evidence that E. coli Hfq has two distinct RNA-binding surfaces. In this study, a comparative sequence-structure analysis of hfq genes in bacterial genomes was employed to identify conserved residues that may be involved in binding RNA. A covariance of residue properties at neighboring positions 12 and 39 and conserved surface residues with high propensities at binding sites of RNA-binding proteins suggested several sites for Hfq-RNA interactions. On the basis of these predictions, eight mutant Hfq proteins were produced and their interactions were examined with the 38 nucleotide (nt) domain II of DsrA ncRNA (DsrA(DII)) and A(18) by a gel-mobility shift assay, fluorescence anisotropy, and fluorescence quenching. Mutations on the proximal surface of Hfq had a small affect on Hfq binding to A(18) (<or=2-fold), while the mutations Y25A and K31A on the distal surface decreased affinity to A(18) by 100-fold in solution. Mutations F39A and R16A on the proximal surface reduced affinity to DsrA(DII) by 6-8-fold, while other mutations on the distal or proximal surfaces affected affinity to DsrA(DII) by <or=2-fold using the gel-mobility shift assay. The F39A/L12F double mutation partially regained the affinity for DsrA(DII) lost by the F39A mutation. The latter observation is consistent with the implied importance of an aromatic residue at position 12 or 39 suggested by the sequence covariance. Titration experiments indicate a 2:1 Hfq(6)/RNA stoichiometry for the strong binding complexes of Hfq with either A(18) or DsrA(DII) and suggests that RNA-induced dimer formation of Hfq(6) is a common feature of Hfq-RNA interactions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Vaults: a ribonucleoprotein particle involved in drug resistance?

Vaults are ribonucleoprotein particles found in the cytoplasm of eucaryotic cells. The 13 MDa particles are composed of multiple copies of three proteins: an M(r) 100 000 major vault protein (MVP) and two minor vault proteins of M(r) 193 000 (vault poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase) and M(r) 240 000 (telomerase-associated protein 1), as well as small untranslated RNA molecules of approximately 100 bases. Although the existence of vaults was first reported in the mid-1980s no function has yet been attributed to this organelle. The notion that vaults might play a role in drug resistance was suggested by the molecular identification of the lung resistance-related (LRP) protein as the human MVP. MVP/LRP was found to be overexpressed in many chemoresistant cancer cell lines and primary tumor samples of different histogenetic origin. Several, but not all, clinico-pathological studies showed that MVP expression at diagnosis was an independent adverse prognostic factor for response to chemotherapy. The hollow barrel-shaped structure of the vault complex and its subcellular localization indicate a function in intracellular transport. It was therefore postulated that vaults contributed to drug resistance by transporting drugs away from their intracellular targets and/or the sequestration of drugs. Here, we review the current knowledge on the vault complex and critically discuss the evidence that links vaults to drug resistance.

Animals↗

Regulation and mode of action of the second small RNA activator of RpoS translation, RprA.

Translation of the stationary phase sigma factor RpoS is stimulated by at least two small RNAs, DsrA and RprA. DsrA disrupts an inhibitory secondary structure in the rpoS leader mRNA by pairing with the upstream RNA. Mutations in rprA and compensating mutations in the rpoS leader demonstrate that RprA interacts with the same region of the RpoS leader as DsrA. This is the first example of two different small RNAs regulating a common target. Regulation of these RNAs differs. DsrA synthesis is increased at low temperature. We find that RprA synthesis is regulated by the RcsC/RcsB phosphorelay system, previously found to regulate capsule synthesis and promoters of ftsZ and osmC. An rcsB null mutation abolishes the basal level, whereas mutations in rcsC that activate capsule synthesis also activate expression of the rprA promoter. An essential site with similarity to other RcsB-regulated promoters was defined in the rprA promoter. Activation of the RcsC/RcsB system leads to increased RpoS synthesis, in an RprA-dependent fashion. This work suggests a new signal for RpoS translation and extends the global regulation effected by the RcsC/RcsB system to coregulation of RpoS with capsule and FtsZ.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Small non-coding RNAs, co-ordinators of adaptation processes in Escherichia coli: the RpoS paradigm.

Adaptation to the changing environment requires both the integration of external signals and the co-ordination of internal responses. Around 50 non-coding small RNAs (sRNAs) have been described in Escherichia coli; the levels of many of these vary with changing environmental conditions. This suggests that they play a role in cell adaptation. In this review, we use the regulation of RpoS (sigma38) translation as a paradigm of sRNA-mediated response to environmental conditions; rpoS is currently the only known gene regulated post-transcriptionally by at least three sRNAs. DsrA and RprA stimulate RpoS translation in response to low temperature and cell surface stress, respectively, whereas OxyS represses RpoS translation in response to oxidative shock. However, in addition to regulating RpoS translation, DsrA represses the translation of HNS (a global regulator of gene expression), whereas OxyS represses the translation of FhlA (a transcriptional activator), allowing the cell to co-ordinate different pathways involved in cell adaptation. Environmental cues affect the synthesis and stability of specific sRNAs, resulting in specific sRNA-dependent translational control.

Adaptation, Biological↗

Multiple human vault RNAs. Expression and association with the vault complex.

Human vaults are intracellular ribonucleoprotein particles believed to be involved in multidrug resistance. The complex consists of a major vault protein (MVP), two minor vault proteins (VPARP and TEP1), and several small untranslated RNA molecules. Three human vault RNA genes (HVG1-3) have been described, and a fourth was found in a homology search (HVG4). In the literature only the association of hvg1 with vaults was shown in vivo. However, in a yeast three-hybrid screen the association of hvg1, hvg2, and hvg4 with TEP1 was demonstrated. In this study we investigated the expression and vault association of different vault RNAs in a variety of cell lines, including pairs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant cells. HVG1-3 are expressed in all cell lines examined, however, none of the cell lines expressed HVG4. This probably is a consequence of the absence of essential external polymerase III promoter elements. The bulk of the vault RNA associated with vaults was hvg1. Interestingly, an increased amount of hvg3 was bound to vaults isolated from multidrug-resistant cell lines. Our findings suggest that vaults bind the RNA molecules with different affinities in different situations. The ratio in which the vault RNAs are associated with vaults might be of functional importance.

Base Sequence↗

Evaluation of the dynamic structure of DsrA RNA from E. coli and its functional consequences.

DsrA RNA is an 87-nucleotide regulatory non-protein-coding RNA of Escherichia coli for which two secondary structure models (I and II) have been proposed. We have compared these models by the energy calculations, which revealed that the currently accepted model II should be rejected on the basis of thermodynamics. Here we provide new results of nuclease footprinting analysis and the application of RNA technologies that have not previously been used for DsrA RNA structural studies, such as hydrolysis with RNase H, DNAzyme, hydroxyl radicals and lead. These approaches together with bioinformatics calculations provided strong arguments for a new model III. This model clearly shows that the long U-rich region between hairpins 1 and 2 is double-stranded. These findings shed new light on DsrA RNA-Hfq interactions.

Computational Biology↗

Highly sensitive genotyping using artificial riboregulator system.

A molecular-beacon-type riboregulator (mRNA) was applied to multiply catalytic gene sensing. It consists of a reporter gene for firefly protein luciferase and, upstream thereof, a regulator hairpin domain composed of an RBS/anti-RBS stem (RBS = ribosome binding site) and a loop which is complementary to the target. The sensing of target gene, using an unmodified RNA or even dsDNA as a probe with a chemiluminescence output, was demonstrated with a sensitivity at < or = 50 fmol of the target and a single nucleotide resolution.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Regulation of RpoS by a novel small RNA: the characterization of RprA.

Translational regulation of the stationary phase sigma factor RpoS is mediated by the formation of a double-stranded RNA stem-loop structure in the upstream region of the rpoS messenger RNA, occluding the translation initiation site. The interaction of the rpoS mRNA with a small RNA, DsrA, disrupts the double-strand pairing and allows high levels of translation initiation. We screened a multicopy library of Escherichia coli DNA fragments for novel activators of RpoS translation when DsrA is absent. Clones carrying rprA (RpoS regulator RNA) increased the translation of RpoS. The rprA gene encodes a 106 nucleotide regulatory RNA. As with DsrA, RprA is predicted to form three stem-loops and is highly conserved in Salmonella and Klebsiella species. Thus, at least two small RNAs, DsrA and RprA, participate in the positive regulation of RpoS translation. Unlike DsrA, RprA does not have an extensive region of complementarity to the RpoS leader, leaving its mechanism of action unclear. RprA is non-essential. Mutations in the gene interfere with the induction of RpoS after osmotic shock when DsrA is absent, demonstrating a physiological role for RprA. The existence of two very different small RNA regulators of RpoS translation suggests that such additional regulatory RNAs are likely to exist, both for regulation of RpoS and for regulation of other important cellular components.

Bacterial Proteins↗