SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “handgrip”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Cutaneous vascular responses to isometric handgrip exercise.

Cutaneous vascular responses to dynamic exercise have been well characterized, but it is not known whether that response pattern applies to isometric handgrip exercise. We examined cutaneous vascular responses to isometric handgrip and dynamic leg exercise in five supine men. Skin blood flow was measured by laser-Doppler velocimetry and expressed as laser-Doppler flow (LDF). Arterial blood pressure was measured noninvasively once each minute. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated as LDF/mean arterial pressure. LDF and CVC responses were measured at the forearm and chest during two 3-min periods of isometric handgrip at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction and expressed as percent changes from the preexercise levels. The skin was normothermic (32 degrees C) for the first period of handgrip and was locally warmed to 39 degrees C for the second handgrip. Finally, responses were observed during 5 min of dynamic two-leg bicycle exercise (150-175 W) at a local skin temperature of 39 degrees C. Arm LDF increased 24.5 +/- 18.9% during isometric handgrip in normothermia and 64.8 +/- 14.1% during isometric handgrip at 39 degrees C (P less than 0.05). Arm CVC did not significantly change at 32 degrees C but significantly increased 18.1 +/- 6.5% during isometric handgrip at 39 degrees C (P less than 0.05). Arm LDF decreased 12.2 +/- 7.9% during dynamic exercise at 39 degrees C, whereas arm CVC fell by 35.3 +/- 4.6% (in each case P less than 0.05). Chest LDF and CVC showed similar responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Effects of repetitive handgrip training on endurance, specificity, and cross-education.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Exercise programs are more likely to be successful when they are based on research that predicts the outcomes of such training. This study determined the effect of submaximal rhythmic handgrip training on rhythmic handgrip endurance or work (RHW), isometric handgrip endurance time (IHE), and maximal voluntary isometric contraction for the handgrip force (MVIC) (in newtons). SUBJECTS: Twenty-four male subjects (mean age=26.2 years) with right-hand dominance were randomly assigned to a regular training group (n=8), a low-level training group (n=8), or a control group (n=8). METHODS: Rhythmic handgrip work, IHE, and MVIC were determined bilaterally before and after 6 weeks of a rhythmic right handgrip training program using 30% of MVIC. The low-level training group performed daily training with a near-zero load (<0.005% of MVIC). RESULTS: There was a 1,232% increase in RHW and an 8% decrease in IHE after the training program using 30% of MVIC for the right hand. The left hand showed a 43% increase in RHW after training, whereas the low-level training group showed a 35% increase in RHW. No differences were found between the change in the left-hand RHW of the regular training group and the change in the right-hand RHW of the low-level training group, but both measurements were greater than the change in the control group (6.4%). CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Submaximal handgrip endurance training at 30% of MVIC had a minimal effect on submaximal IHE and MVIC of the handgrip, but it had a large effect on RHW of the trained extremity. The regular training group and the low-level training group showed similar increases in cross-education, suggesting that cross-education during endurance training is not intensity-dependent.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The effects of handgrip stress test on hemodynamic parameters before and after cilazapril treatment in patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of cilazapril treatment on several hemodynamic parameters during handgrip maneuvers in patients with congestive heart failure. Cilazapril, an ACE inhibitor with high affinity, has been shown to be highly effective against a variety of vascular disorders. The effectiveness of isometric handgrip exercise on changes of cardiovascular hemodynamic parameters before and after cilazapril treatment in patients with congestive heart failure is unknown. METHODS: The study population included 30 patients (16 male, 14 female) with mean age of 65+/-18 years. The effects of handgrip maneuver on hemodynamic parameters were studied by right heart catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressures (MAP) increased significantly after handgrip maneuver (from 95+/-6 beats/min to 101+/-12 beats/min; from 109+/-15 mm Hg to 118+/-19 mm Hg, p<0.05 respectively). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), pulmonary artery systolic (s) and diastolic (d) pressures (PAP), cardiac index (CI), right ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures (RVPs and RVPd), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) did not change after handgrip maneuvers (p>0.05). On the other hand, PAPs and PAPd, RVPs and RVPd, MAP and HR (p<0.05) decreased significantly during handgrip maneuvers after cilazapril treatment. However PCWP and CI, LVEF, RVEF did not change after treatment (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular response to handgrip maneuver may be a marker of failure to respond to compensatory mechanisms. Cilazapril treatment was associated with significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters during handgrip stress test, the mechanisms of which are increased sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system activation, and altered vascular tonus.

Adult↗

PubMed1976

Evaluation of left ventricular performance in coronary heart disease: use of isometric handgrip stress test.

The usefulness of isometric handgrip exercise in the assessment of left ventricular function was studied in 27 patients, all of whom had angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The effect of extensiveness of coronary disease and presence or absence of collaterals (both delineated by coronary arteriography) on the response to handgrip stress was also evaluated. Of 11 patients with a normal handgrip response, 4 exhibited a normal left ventriculogram and 7 were abnormal. Of these 7, 6 had inferior hypokinesis. Conversely, of 16 patients with an abnormal response to handgrip, 15 had abnormal ventriculograms. Of these, 9 had anterior akinesis. Of patients with a normal handgrip response 82% had two- or three-vessel coronary disease, and 94% with an abnormal response exhibited two- or three-vessel obstruction. There was no observed correlation between the presence or absence of collaterals and the response to handgrip. This study indicates that (1) handgrip stress, when combined with left ventriculography, often yields important additional information regarding the effect of localized contraction abnormalities on overall left ventricular performance; (2) the extent of coronary obstructive disease or the presence of collaterals per se do not appear to be the primary determinants of left ventricular performance; (3) it is possible that the location as well as severity and extent of left ventricular contraction abnormality may play an important role in determining overall left ventricular performance.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Frequency domain heart rate variability and plasma norepinephrine level in the coronary sinus during handgrip exercise.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) variability has been recognized as an important noninvasive index of autonomic nervous activities. However, the relationship between HR variability and cardiac circulating norepinephrine (NE), especially with respect to coronary ischemia, remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: This study was undertaken to determine whether HR variability indices can reflect cardiac NE levels during handgrip exercise. METHODS: We simultaneously measured HR variability and cardiac NE overflow rate in 32 patients (30 men, 2 women) during a 6-min isometric handgrip exercise. Among the 32 subjects, 20 (19 men, 1 woman) had coronary artery disease (CAD) and 12 (control group; 11 men, 1 woman) did not. RESULTS: Hemodynamics and cardiac NE overflow rates among subjects at rest were not significantly different between the two groups. In the normal subjects, low-frequency (LF) spectra and LF/HF (high-frequency) ratios were not significantly changed during handgrip exercise, but HF spectra significantly increased from 10.1 +/- 4.5 to 12.2 +/- 7.0 ms (p < 0.05). In the subjects with CAD, LF and LF/HF spectra were significantly (p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively) increased by handgrip exercise. High-frequency spectra were not significantly changed by handgrip exercise. In the normal subjects, a significant negative relation (r = -0.76, p < 0.01) was obtained between HF change and cardiac NE overflow rate, whereas this relationship was not significant in the subjects with CAD. The correlation between changes of LF/HF and cardiac NE overflow rate was significant in the normal (r = 0.56, p < 0.05) but not in subjects with CAD. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that vagal modulation of HR variability is more prominent in normal coronary artery subjects than in CAD subjects during handgrip exercise. Heart rate variability indices may thus serve as adequate indicators of autonomic nerve activity in subjects with normal coronary arteries but not in those with CAD, probably due to decreased adaptation to physical stress during handgrip exercise.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1991

Cardiovascular response to static handgrip in trained and untrained men.

The influence of aerobic capacity on the cardiovascular response to handgrip exercise, in relation to the muscle mass involved in the effort, was tested in 8 trained men (T) and 17 untrained men (U). The subjects performed handgrip exercises with the right-hand (RH), left-hand (LH) and both hands simultaneously (RLH) at an intensity of 25% of maximal voluntary contraction force. Maximal aerobic capacity was 4.3 l.min-1 in T and 3.21 l.min-1 in U (P less than 0.01). The endurance time for handgrip was longer in T than in U by 29% (P less than 0.05) for RH, 38% (P less than 0.001) for LH and 24% (P less than 0.001) for RLH. Heart rate (fc) was significantly lower in T than in U before handgrip exercise, and showed smaller increases (P less than 0.01) at the point of exhaustion: 89 vs 106 beats.min-1 for RH, 93 vs 100 beats.min-1 for LH and 92 vs 108 beats.min-1 for RLH. Stroke volume (SV) at rest was greater in T than in U and decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) during handgrip exercise in both groups of subjects. At the point of exhaustion SV was still greater in T than in U: 75 vs 57 ml for RH, 76 vs 54 ml for LH and 76 vs 56 ml for RLH. During the last seconds of handgrip exercise, the left ventricular ejection time was longer in T than in U. Increases in cardiac output (Qc) and systolic blood pressure did not differ substantially between T and U, nor between the handgrip exercise tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Weight carrying versus handgrip exercise testing in men with coronary artery disease.

The clinical merits of handgrip and weight carrying tests were compared in 30 patients with documented coronary artery disease. The static loads in the 2 tests were matched by percentage of maximal static effort and corresponded to 25 and 45% of maximal voluntary handgrip contraction and 25 and 45% of maximal 1-hand lift capacity. Each static load in both tests was continued for less than or equal to 3 minutes. At the 25% maximal effort stage, 93 and 90% of patients were able to complete 3 minutes of handgrip and weight carrying, respectively. Only 13 and 10% were able to complete 3 minutes at the 45% maximal effort stage with handgrip and weight carrying, respectively. Arm fatigue and an increase in diastolic blood pressure greater than 120 mm Hg were the predominant endpoints. Weight carrying resulted in significantly higher (p less than 0.05) heart rate, systolic blood pressure, pressure-rate product, ventilation and oxygen consumption compared to handgrip. Diastolic blood pressure responses did not differ between the tests. None of the patients demonstrated ischemic responses to either handgrip or weight carrying and the incidence of arrhythmias was rare. The diastolic blood pressure response to static effort is equally evaluated by handgrip and weight carrying tests. However, the greater myocardial oxygen demand, reflected by the pressure-rate product, in addition to the greater total body oxygen consumption, imposed by weight carrying, enhances the clinical application of the weight carrying test.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Handgrip strength and cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive decline and dementia are associated with disability and premature death in old age. We examined whether low handgrip strength predicts subsequent cognitive decline in older Mexican Americans. METHODS: We worked with a 7-year prospective cohort of 2160 noninstitutionalized Mexican Americans aged 65 years or older from the Hispanic Established Population for the Epidemiological Study of the Elderly (H-EPESE) who had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or = 21 at baseline. Measures included: (i) sociodemographic factors (age, gender, and education), handgrip strength, and near and distant visual impairment from baseline interview; and (ii) MMSE, body mass index (BMI), and medical conditions (stroke, heart attack, diabetes, depression, and hypertension) from four waves of data collection. RESULTS: Using general linear mixed models, we found a significant trend with scores in the lowest quartile of handgrip strength at baseline to be associated with lower MMSE scores over time (estimate = -1.28, standard error = 0.16; p <.0001). There was a significant handgrip Strength-by-Time interaction with MMSE scores. Participants in the lowest handgrip strength quartile had a greater cognitive decline over time (estimate = -0.26, standard error = 0.07; p <.001) than did those participants in the highest quartile. This association remained statistically significant after controlling for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSION: Older Mexican Americans with reduced handgrip strength at baseline demonstrated a statistically significant decline in cognitive function over a 7-year period. By contrast, participants in the highest handgrip strength quartile maintained a higher level of cognitive function.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Effect of axillary blockade on regional cerebral blood flow during static handgrip.

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was determined at rest and during static handgrip before and after regional blockade with lidocaine. A fast rotating single photon emission computer tomograph system with 133Xe inhalation was used at orbitomeatal plane (OM) +2.5 and +6.5 cm in eight subjects. Median handgrip force during the control study was 41 (range 24-68) N, which represented 10% of the initial maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and was 24 (18-36) N after axillary blockade (P less than 0.05), which represented 21% of the new MVC. During static handgrip, the rating of perceived exertion was 14 (10-16) exertion units before and 18 (15-20) after blockade (P less than 0.05). Hemispheric mean CBF did not change during handgrip. However, premotor rCBF increased from 55 (44-63) to 60 (50-69) ml.100 g-1.min-1 (P less than 0.05) and motor sensory rCBF from 57 (46-65) to 63 (55-71) ml.100 g-1.min-1 (P less than 0.05) to both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides during handgrip before, but not after, axillary blockade. There was no change in rCBF to other regions of the brain. Regional anesthesia with lidocaine did not alter resting rCBF. However, despite a greater sense of effort during static handgrip, there was no increase in rCBF after partial sensory and motor blockade. Thus bilateral activation occurs in the premotor and motor sensory cortex during static handgrip, and this activation requires neural feedback from the contracting muscles.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Skeletal muscle vascular responses in human limbs to isometric handgrip.

Studies of whole limb blood flow have shown that static handgrip elicits a vasodilatation in the resting forearm and vasoconstriction in the resting leg. We asked if these responses occur in the skeletal muscle vascular bed, and if so, what is the relative contribution of local metabolic versus other mechanisms to these vascular responses. Blood flow recordings were made simultaneously in the skeletal muscle of the resting arm and leg using the Xenon-washout method in ten subjects during 3 min of isometric handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. In the arm, skeletal muscle vascular resistance (SMVR) decreased transiently at the onset of exercise followed by a return to baseline levels at the end of exercise. In the leg SMVR remained unchanged during the 1st min of handgrip, but had increased to exceed baseline levels by the end of exercise. During exercise electromyography (EMG) recordings from nonexercising limbs demonstrated a progressive 20-fold increase in activity in the arm, but remained at baseline in the leg. During EMG-signal modelled exercise performed to mimic the inadvertent muscle activity, decreases in forearm SMVR amounted to 57% of the decrease seen with controlateral handgrip. The present study would seem to indicate that vascular tone in nonexercising skeletal muscle in the arm and leg are controlled differently during the early stages of static handgrip. Metabolic vasodilation due to involuntary contraction could significantly modulate forearm skeletal muscle vascular responses, but other factors, most likely neural vasodilator mechanisms, must make major contributions. During the later stages of contralateral sustained handgrip, vascular adjustments in resting forearm skeletal muscle would seem to be the final result of reflex sympathetic vasoconstrictor drive, local metabolic vasodilator forces and possibly neurogenic vasodilator mechanisms.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Cardiovascular and sympatho-adrenal responses to static handgrip performed with one and two hands.

12 healthy men aged 21-25 years performed, in the sitting position, a sustained handgrip at 25% of their maximum voluntary contraction, first with each hand separately and then with both hands simultaneously. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), stroke volume (determined reographically) and plasma catecholamine concentration were measured during each handgrip test. The HR and SBP increased consistently during each handgrip test while stroke volume decreased by approximately 20% of the initial value. Cardiac output did not change significantly. There were no significant differences in the magnitude and dynamics of the cardiovascular responses between the tests with one and with both hands. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline levels showed similar elevations in response to handgrip performed with the right hand and with both hands, while during the exercise performed with the left hand the increase in the plasma catecholamine concentration was less pronounced. It was concluded that: (1) during sustained handgrip, performed in the sitting position by young healthy subjects, the stroke volume markedly decreases and cardiac output does not change significantly in spite of the increased HR; (2) the cardiovascular and sympatho-adrenal responses to static handgrip do not depend on the mass of contracting muscle when the same relative tension is developed.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Assessment of left ventricular function by isometric handgrip exercise after thrombolysis in patients with refractory unstable angina.

The handgrip test has been proposed for the evaluation of the hemodynamic reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and to quantitate the impairment of left ventricular (LV) function. The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of thrombolytic therapy in patients with refractory unstable angina in order to test the hypothesis that a reduction in intracoronary thrombosis could ameliorate their hemodynamic response to the handgrip test. During left heart catheterization, 20 patients with refractory unstable angina of recent onset performed a handgrip test before (HG1) and 24-72 hours after (HG2) being randomized to receive recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator or placebo, according to a double-blind parallel group design. HG1 induced an increase in heart rate (p < 0.001), in systolic pressure (p < 0.001), and a reduction in ejection fraction (p < 0.05). Changes in LV end-diastolic pressure during baseline handgrip were highly different in individual patients, resulting in a trend toward an increase. Similarly, a different individual response was observed in the behavior of the isovolumetric and relaxation indices. In comparison with HG1, no difference was detected during HG2 in the 2 treatment groups with respect to changes in LV volumes, ejection fraction, LV systolic and diastolic pressures, +dP/dt, (dP/dt)/P, -dP/dt, and tau index. In patients with refractory unstable angina of recent onset, the handgrip test performed before and after thrombolysis did not prove to be useful in assessing directional changes of LV performance, mainly because of the different individual response to the baseline handgrip test.

Angina, Unstable↗

PubMed2006

Handgrip-enhanced myocardial fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary artery stenoses.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) may yield false-negative results in up to 12% of lesions tested, and there is a zone of uncertainty at borderline values. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were investigated by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), coronary angiography, and FFR assessment of 48 coronary lesions before, during, and immediately after handgrip exercise. RESULTS: Mean FFR values were lower during and immediately after handgrip exercise as compared with baseline (0.86 +/- 0.09 vs 0.87 +/- 0.08 vs 0.88 +/- 0.08, P < .05, respectively). The sensitivity of FFR < or = 0.75 for predicting myocardial ischemia on DSE was 17.6% before handgrip exercise, 52.9% during, and 35.5% immediately after exercise. The specificity of FFR < or = 0.75 before, during, and immediate after exercise was 100%, 93.5%, and 96.8%, respectively. In 10 patients, FFR values > 0.75 before handgrip became < or = 0.75 during or immediately after handgrip exercise (P = .01). All these patients had angina and/or DSE indicating ischemia in the territory of the vessel studied, and underwent coronary intervention. At 6 months follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic with negative DSE tests. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of handgrip exercise can significantly lower the FFR and potentially improve its ability to detect physiologically significant stenoses.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed2001

The effect of handgrip position on upper extremity neuromuscular responses to arm cranking exercise.

The purpose of this study was to determine if handgrip position during arm cranking exercise influences the neuromuscular activity of muscles biceps brachii (BB), lateral head of triceps brachii (TB), middle deltoid (DT), infraspinatus (IS) and brachioradialis (BR). Fifteen participants cranked an arm ergometer using three different handgrip positions (supinated, pronated, and neutral). Electromyographic (EMG) data were recorded from the aforementioned muscles, and relative duration of EMG activation and amplitude were quantified for the first and second 180 degrees of crank angle. EMG measures were analyzed with MANOVA and follow-up univariate procedures; alpha was set at 0.01. The relative durations of EMG activation did not differ between handgrip positions. Muscle IS exhibited 36% less amplitude in the supinated versus neutral handgrip position (second half-cycle), and muscle BR displayed 63% greater amplitude across cycles in the neutral versus supinated and pronated handgrip positions. The greater BR activity displayed in the neutral handgrip position may reflect its anatomical advantage as an elbow flexor when the forearm is in neutral position. Muscle IS exhibited less activity in the supinated position and may be clinically relevant if it allows arm cranking to occur without subsequent shoulder pain, which is often the aim of shoulder rehabilitation.

Adult↗

PubMed1975

Adrenergic responses to sustained handgrip in patients with juvenile-onset-type diabetes mellitus.

1. The response of plasma noradrenaline, arterial blood pressure and heart rate to sustained handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction was studied in patients with long-term juvenile-onset-type diabetes millitus and healthy subjects of comparable age. 2. There was no significant difference between the intensity and duration of handgrip in diabetic patients and healthy subjects. 3. Sustained handgrip produced an increase in plasma concentration of noradrenaline both in diabetic and healthy subjects but the response in the diabetic subjects was significantly less. 4. The increase in systolic blood pressure during handgrip was significantly greater in diabetic subjects than in normal subjects. The increases in diastolic and mean blood pressure did not differ significantky. 5. The increase in heart rate during handgrip was greater in healthy subjects than in diabetic subjects. The response was smaller in diabetic patients with retinopathy than in the patients without retinopathy. 6. The sustained handgrip test may be useful for the diagnosis of abnormal sympathetic nervous system and haemodnynamic responsiveness in diabetic patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1983

Haemodynamic responses to static and dynamic handgrip before and after autonomic blockade.

1. Six healthy men performed static and dynamic handgrip to local muscular fatigue in approximately 6 min under control conditions, i.e. without drugs and after combined parasympathetic and beta-adrenergic blockade with atropine and metoprolol. 2. From rest to exercise at fatigue, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures increased by 32 +/- 4 and 39 +/- 3 mmHg, 24 +/- 3 and 26 +/- 4 mmHg, and 26 +/- 3 and 30 +/- 3 mmHg respectively for static and dynamic handgrip. There were no significant differences between the pressor responses for the two modes of contraction. Cardiac output increased significantly only during dynamic exercise. Total peripheral resistance increased by 2.3 +/- 1.0 units for static handgrip (P less than 0.05) and by 0.7 +/- 0.8 unit (P greater than 0.05) for dynamic handgrip. Autonomic blockade abolished the heart rate response to both static and dynamic handgrip. For both modes of contraction the systolic arterial pressure responses were 9-12 mmHg lower (P less than 0.05) after autonomic blockade, but the diastolic and mean pressure responses were not significantly affected. A significant increase in cardiac output persisted during dynamic exercise. The increase in peripheral resistance during static exercise tended to be greater after blockade. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline levels showed only minor elevations in response to static and dynamic handgrip and were not changed by autonomic blockade. 3. These data indicate that when performed to a common end-point with identical small muscle groups static and dynamic exercise produce an equally large pressor response, which is only slightly attenuated by autonomic blockade.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Post-occlusion brachial artery vasodilatation after ischaemic handgrip exercise is nitric oxide mediated.

Flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery is used as a measure to quantify endothelial dysfunction. However, FMD after occlusion only is small in healthy people over middle age, but can be increased after handgrip exercise. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether postocclusion vasodilatation after handgrip exercise is mediated by nitric oxide (NO). High frequency ultrasound was used to measure brachial artery diameter at rest and after reactive hyperaemia with and without handgrip exercise during NaCl or NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) infusion in healthy 60-year-old men. Postocclusion vasodilation was significantly larger after handgrip exercise compared with occlusion only (P=0.0078). Postocclusion vasodilatation was significantly lower after ischaemic handgrip exercise during intra-arterial infusion of L-NMMA compared with infusion of NaCl (P = 0.039). It may be concluded that the increased postocclusion brachial artery vasodilatation observed after ischaemic handgrip exercise is at least partly NO mediated. This modification of the investigation procedure may improve our ability to quantify FMD in subjects with and without vascular disease.

Arm↗

PubMed2000

Modelling handgrip strength in the presence of confounding variables: results from the Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey.

Differences in handgrip strength, caused by risk factors such as physical inactivity, will be influenced by 'confounding' variables, e.g. age, body size. The aims of the study were to identify the confounding variables associated with handgrip strength and to assess the benefit that physical activity plays in maintaining grip strength within a population, having adjusted for differences in these confounding variables. The most appropriate linear body size dimension associated with grip strength was height rather than demispan. Non-linear associations with age and body mass were also identified. Handgrip strength peaked in the age group 25 - 34 years for male subjects and in the age group 35 - 44 years for female subjects. Similarly, handgrip strength increased with body mass until it peaked at a body mass of approximately 100 kg for male and 90 kg for female subjects; thereafter a rapid decline in grip strength was observed. Differences in handgrip strength were found to be significantly associated with levels of physical activity even having controlled for differences in age and body size (height, mass and percentage body fat), but the observed association was not linear. The level of physical activity necessary to maintain an optimal level of handgrip strength was found to be a balance of moderate or vigorous occasions of physical activity.

Adult↗