SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “machine learning (ML)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2025

Triage and workflow optimization with artificial intelligence in pediatric imaging.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly utilized in various aspects by the radiology department. With an ever-increasing burden on the healthcare system, particularly in emergency units, the need to incorporate AI in patient triage and workflow optimization cannot be overstated. Machine learning (ML)-based algorithms form the core of AI-based software, aiding healthcare professionals at nearly every step in delivering appropriate patient care. Regarding the radiology section of the hospital, AI-based algorithms have proven exceptionally useful in assisting radiologists and technicians with image acquisition. From accurate clinical referrals to scheduling computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scan appointments, from ensuring the lowest radiation exposure to offering timely follow-up reminders, ML-based software has indeed revolutionized the concept of modern image acquisition, especially in the pediatric radiology section. Although the implementation of these algorithms is swift, several technical challenges and the limited availability of pediatric datasets preclude their widespread use. The utility of multimodal pediatric datasets, which combine imaging, genomics, and clinical data, for comprehensive AI triage models can help AI systems evolve toward greater adaptability and integration, resulting in enhanced efficiency, reduced turnaround times, and improved patient outcomes in pediatric radiology departments in the future. In this article, we highlight and review the utility of AI and machine learning-based algorithms in efficiently aiding triage and streamlining the workflow in the pediatric radiology section, thereby ensuring an overall improvement in the departmental workflow.

Triage↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of classic statistical methods and machine learning approaches to classify readiness.

MOTIVATION: Predicting physical and cognitive readiness in warfighters is critical for mission success. These predictions can be improved by identifying key biomarkers using multiple omics modalities. The MASTR-E study conducted by McKetney and colleagues is one of the most comprehensive multi-omics studies of saliva samples collected from warfighters, which also applied classic linear statistical (CLS) techniques to discover key biomarkers of readiness. Aligning with McKetney et al.'s assumptions, we operationalize readiness as a binary proxy, where pre-mission samples are labeled as "ready" to reflect a rested, unstressed physiological baseline, while post-mission samples are labeled "not ready" to reflect cumulative physical and cognitive load from the mission. As such, readiness here is not a direct biological or physiological construct, but an inferred state likely dominated by stress-related physiological changes. This assumption and definition is discussed further in the Introduction and Limitations sections. Here, we apply machine learning (ML) analyses to better assess generalizability, consider hidden interactions, and identify nonlinear patterns in the data. We investigated whether ML approaches could predict readiness and identify relevant biomarkers. ML models were trained on proteomics-only or metabolomics-only datasets to classify participants as ready or not ready and important model features were considered as putative biomarkers. Training and testing datasets were curated for two objectives: (i) recognize biomolecular signatures indicative of readiness within the same donor and (ii) assess generalizability across warfighters by withholding donors for testing. RESULTS: Proteomics-based models achieved AUCs of 0.907 ± 0.034 and 0.860 ± 0.063 for Objectives 1 and 2, respectively. Metabolomics-based models achieved Objective 1 AUC of 0.994 ± 0.007 and Objective 2 AUC of 0.993 ± 0.010. Comparative analysis with existing literature validates the model's feature importances, but the identified putative biomarkers significantly differ from those discovered through CLS analyses, as only one ML-identified biomarker overlapping with those identified through CLS methods. We show that these ML models and identified features are more robust to noise and generalizable across participants than those identified using CLS methods. AVAILABILITY: The analysis pipelines are provided as Jupyter notebooks, including all code and documentation, and are available publicly on GitHub at {https://github.com/netrias/ReadinessClassification}.

Machine Learning↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic performance of machine learning models versus established risk stratification for intracranial aneurysm rupture: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to improve the discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status beyond established clinical risk stratification tools. However, reported performance is heterogeneous and the relative contribution of model architecture and feature dominance remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of studies evaluating ML models for intracranial aneurysm rupture discrimination. PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were searched to February 2026. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate random-effects model, with summary receiver operating characteristic curves generated across training, internal testing and external validation datasets. Models were compared with regression-based approaches and Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of aneurysm, Earlier subarachnoid haemorrhage, Site of aneurysm (PHASES) scores. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored associations between algorithm family and feature domain. RESULTS: Sixty-two retrospective cohorts (29 709 patients 209 models) met the inclusion criteria. In training datasets, pooled sensitivity and specificity for ML were 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.85) and 0.83 (0.80-0.86), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878, exceeding PHASES (AUC 0.667). In testing datasets, ML retained higher discrimination (AUC 0.837) than regression models (0.806) and PHASES (0.646). In external validation, sensitivity was preserved (0.82), but specificity declined (0.66). Deep learning demonstrated the highest AUCs (training and testing). Incorporation of haemodynamic or radiomic features improved pooled discrimination relative to morphology alone. Evidence of small-study effects and mostly unclear Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool ratings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: ML approaches demonstrate higher pooled discrimination for aneurysm rupture status than conventional risk scores in retrospective datasets, but reduced external validation specificity and heterogeneity limit confidence for clinical translation. Prospective, externally validated, calibrated models are required before integration into routine cerebrovascular risk stratification.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integrating machine learning and GWAS for variant prioritization in the INCIPE cohort highlights ABC transporter genes in chronic kidney disease.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health challenge, affecting approximately 674 million people worldwide and representing one of the fastest-growing causes of mortality. Since CKD is frequently asymptomatic in its early stages, the identification of novel genetic biomarkers may improve early detection and risk stratification. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified numerous genetic loci associated with CKD and related traits; however, their performance is often limited in small and imbalanced cohorts, where reduced statistical power increases both false-positive and false-negative findings. Machine learning (ML) approaches can complement conventional GWAS by prioritizing biologically relevant genetic signals from high-dimensional genomic data. METHODS: In this study, we implemented a nested ensemble (NCBC) model composed of an undersampler and a CatBoostClassifier (CBC) to prioritize candidate genetic variants associated with CKD in the INCIPE cohort. Prioritized variants were functionally annotated and evaluated through enrichment analyses, GTEx gene expression profiling, and protein-protein interaction network analyses. Genes identified by the CKDGen Consortium were analysed as an external reference set and used to validate the biological relevance of the prioritized results. RESULTS: The NCBC model outperformed conventional ML classifiers, achieving a ROC AUC score of 87.77%, compared to 50%-53% for the other evaluated models. Among the prioritized genes, 56.25% showed protein-protein interactions with genes previously reported by the CKDGen Consortium, whereas only 1.9% of randomly generated gene sets showed interactions. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates that the NCBC model improves the prioritization of biologically plausible candidate variants in a small and imbalanced CKD cohort. Functional analyses suggested ABC transporter-related genes, including ABCA13, ABCA4, and ABCC4 genes, as promising candidate for future validation, with ABCA4 showing substantial expression in kidney tissues. Overall, these findings support the integration of ML with GWAS to prioritize candidate genes and investigate the genetic architecture of complex diseases.

SNP prioritization↗

PubMed2026

A benchmarking study of feature screening approaches across type 1 diabetes omics studies classification settings.

In recent years, high dimensional omics analyses have become more commonplace for investigating complex biological systems. Typically, these studies attempt to identify key biomolecules associated with a particular biological process. Often, machine learning (ML) is used to identify these biomolecules, typically by learning which biomolecules are highly predictive of a treatment, biological outcome, or phenotype. A major challenge of applying ML to high throughput omics is overcoming noise when sample size is limited and unbalanced with respect to tens of thousands of biomolecules measured. Thus, feature selection (the process of reducing the number of predictors) is both a critical and common step in the ML analysis pipeline. While much attention has been given to embedding and wrapping techniques for feature selection in the omics space, filter-based methods for model-free feature selection have appealing theoretical properties. This manuscript evaluates sure screening, a class of filter-based feature selection methods which provide analytical guarantees for true feature set retention. Here, we cover existing feature screening methods based on the sure screening principal, available software, methods to improve feature screening, and contextualize feature screening in the larger discussion of feature selection for omics data analysis. Additionally, a suite of model-free sure screening approaches is applied and compared for several omics biomedical applications in a ML classification context. We identified BcorSIS as the most effective and computationally efficient screening method across various omics datasets, consistently outperforming others like CSIS and DCSIS in runtime.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Integrating structure and experimental data annotations with computational modeling framework for predicting micro-nanoplastics toxicities.

The wide use of plastic materials leads to increased emissions of micro-nanoplastics (MNPs) into the environment, raising significant concerns about their impact on human health. Traditional experimental approaches for assessing MNPs toxicity are costly, time-consuming, and there are no experimental protocols that are universally acceptable. Computational modeling using machine learning (ML) approaches provides an efficient alternative to MNP toxicity assessment. However, most modeling studies of MNPs are limited due to the lack of high-quality data and there are few previous modeling studies considering complex structures of MNPs for model training. To address this challenge, we constructed three MNP datasets with popular toxicity endpoints from various resources and used nanostructure annotation techniques to create virtual MNPs (vMNPs) for all MNP structures. The MNP structures were digitalized from annotated vMNPs, and geometrical descriptors were calculated using the Delaunay Tessellation approach. Moreover, important experimental information, such as concentrations and cell lines, were transformed into extra training variables. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models were built using both experimental and geometrical descriptors and validated through a leave-one-out cross validation procedure. The resulting models showed reasonable performance in predicting toxicity potentials of MNPs for the three endpoints in the present datasets. Moreover, an additional library of vMNPs with their predicted properties and bioactivities was constructed, directing further research of new MNPs. This study provides three novel ML models for MNPs by integrating geometrical and experimental descriptors, which have the potential to assess new MNPs for their toxicity. The modeling strategy developed in this study can be easily expanded to model other MNP toxicity endpoints and create promising new models for MNP toxicity assessments.

Data annotation↗

PubMed2026

Machine learning-based clinical prediction model and multi-omics integration for assessing pancreatic cancer risk in new-onset diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Given that pancreatic cancer (PC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage but is often preceded by new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), providing a window for early detection, we sought to develop and validate an interpretable machine-learning model integrated with multi-omics profiling to identify early biomarkers of NODM-associated PC. METHODS: In a population-based cohort, individuals with NODM-associated PC and NODM without PC were identified and randomly divided (70:30) into training and validation sets after feature selection. Eight machine learning (ML) classifiers were compared using fivefold cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and decision curve–based clinical utility. We evaluated interpretability using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses. Mechanistically, Olink proteomic profiling and metabolomics were analyzed through clinical classifications and model-defined risk strata. RESULTS: Categorical boosting achieved the best performance in the independent validation set (AUROC = 0.844). The NODM cohort was stratified into high- (n = 2,362) and low-risk (n = 5,030) groups, and internal validation together with SHAP analyses demonstrated consistent model performance and identified clinically interpretable predictors. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses under clinical and risk-based grouping identified 39 overlapping differentially expressed proteins and 145 overlapping metabolites with enriched across 11 shared KEGG pathways. Cross-platform validation highlighted PLTP, CRTAC1, and ITGAV as serum biomarkers with a strong potential for early NODM-PC detection. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an interpretable ML framework centered on NODM enables practical risk stratification for early PC detection by multi-omics and provides a pathway of ML-based triage followed by biomarker confirmation for earlier detection and diagnosis.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Development and evaluation of a machine learning model for osteoporosis risk prediction in Korean women.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for classifying osteoporosis in Korean women based on a large-scale population cohort study. This study also aimed to assess ML model performance compared with traditional osteoporosis screening tools. Furthermore, this study aimed to examine the factors influencing the risk of osteoporosis through variable importance. METHODS: Data was collected from 4199 women aged 40-69 years in the baseline survey of the Ansan and Ansung cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Osteoporosis was set as the dependent variable to develop ML classification models. Independent variables included 122 factors related to osteoporosis risk, such as socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric parameters, lifestyle factors, reproductive factors, nutrient intakes, diet quality indices, medical history, medication history, family history, biochemical parameters, and genetic factors. The six classification models were developed using ML techniques, including decision tree, random forest, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, light gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The six ML classification models were compared with two traditional osteoporosis screening tools, including the osteoporosis risk assessment instrument (ORAI) and the osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST). The ML model performances were evaluated and compared using the confusion matrix and area under the curve (AUC) metrics. Variable importance was assessed using the XGBoost technique to investigate osteoporosis risk factors. RESULTS: The XGBoost model showed the highest performance out of the six ML classification models, with an accuracy of 0.705, precision of 0.664, recall of 0.830, and F1 score of 0.738. Moreover, the XGBoost model showed a higher performance on AUC than ORAI and OST. Variable importance scores were identified for 69 out of the 122 variables associated with osteoporosis risk factors. Age at menopause ranked first in variable importance. Variables of arthritis, physical activities, hypertension, education level, income level; alcohol intake, potassium intake, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; energy intake, vitamin C intake, gout; and dietary inflammatory index ranked in the top 20 out of the 69 variables, using the XGBoost technique. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that an XGBoost model can be utilized to classify osteoporosis in Korean women. Age at menopause is a significant factor in osteoporosis risk, followed by arthritis, physical activities, hypertension, and education level.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Systemic Proteome Profiling to Differentiate Primary Glomerular Diseases.

KEY POINTS: Plasma proteome profiling identified distinct signatures across biopsy-proven primary glomerular disease subtypes. An elastic net model using 93 proteins classified primary glomerular disease subtypes and controls, with external validation. Integrating proteomics with machine learning yields biologically interpretable insights in primary glomerular diseases. BACKGROUND: Primary GN is a heterogeneous group of kidney disorders where understanding of their pathophysiology remains incomplete. Despite the diagnostic potential of high-throughput proteomics, constrained proteomic depth and a reliance on binary comparisons have left the feasibility of using systemic signatures to differentiate multiple GN subtypes largely unexplored. METHODS: To identify protein signatures that noninvasively differentiate major primary glomerular disease subtypes and provide mechanistic insights, we performed large-scale systemic proteome profiling of 5416 plasma proteins via Olink Explore HT in a discovery cohort ( n =147) and an external validation cohort ( n =85) of Korean participants (mean age, 41±13 years; 46% female). The study population included patients with four GN subtypes-focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IgA nephropathy, minimal change disease, and membranous nephropathy-alongside healthy controls. We developed a machine learning (ML) model using logistic regression with elastic net regularization to classify disease groups based on proteomic profiles and evaluated its performance in the independent validation cohort. RESULTS: Plasma proteome profiles were distinct among disease subtypes, emerging as a significant source of data variation independent of conventional markers such as eGFR or proteinuria levels. The ML model performed robustly in both the discovery and validation cohorts, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.8 for differentiating minimal change disease, membranous nephropathy, and IgA nephropathy. The model, even without clinical information, correctly identified 93% of minimal change disease cases (14 of 15) and 63% of IgA nephropathy cases (20 of 32), but its performance was limited for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, with only 21% of cases (three of 14) correctly classified. Functional analysis of key proteins highlighted distinct biologic pathways, such as hemostasis in minimal change disease. CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct systemic proteome signatures for primary glomerular diseases, where disease subtype served as a major determinant of proteomic variance alongside conventional clinical markers. ML models demonstrated robust discriminatory performance for minimal change disease, membranous nephropathy, and IgA nephropathy, underscoring the potential for proteome-based classification.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sex Hormone Receptors, HBV Integrations and Their Prognostic Predictive Value Among Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) related to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection predominantly affects males, yet few studies have investigated the association between sex hormones and HBV integrations, and their involvement in HCC prognosis. We assessed estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and androgen receptor (AR) expression via immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays constructed from 426 HBV-related HCC samples. HBV integration features were determined using HBV-captured sequencing data. Logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate the association between sex hormone receptor expression level and HBV integration features. Cox regression models, combined with machine learning (ML) methods, were implemented to investigate the prognostic value of sex hormone receptors and HBV integrations concerning overall survival. We found high AR expression level was significantly associated with higher HBV integration levels (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-3.11, P for trend = 0.012), TERT integration (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.16-4.74, P for trend = 0.047), intergenic integration (aOR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.20-4.24, P for trend = 0.021), and promoter integration (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.00-3.31, P for trend = 0.034). The inclusion of sex hormone receptors and HBV integrations in the predictive models led to improvements across all performance metrics in the Cox regression analyses (AUC improvement: 0.014 [Training], 0.026 [Validation]) and the ML (AUC improvement: 0.022 [Training]), although a slight deterioration in performance was noted in the ML validation set. The results suggested a relationship between AR expression level and HBV integration events, as well as the potential utility of HBV integration biomarkers and sex hormone receptor profiles in assessing post-surgical prognosis among HCC patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its organ involvement is essential. Previous reviews of machine learning (ML) in SLE combined heterogeneous tasks and validation strategies and may have overinterpreted model performance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of ML and deep learning (DL) models for 3 clinically distinct SLE-related tasks: SLE classification or diagnosis, lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis, and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) discrimination. We also assessed methodological quality and certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from January 2014 to April 2026. Eligible peer-reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies developed or validated ML or DL models for 1 of the 3 prespecified tasks, used an accepted reference standard, and provided data for a 2×2 contingency table. Bivariate random-effects meta-analyses with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment were used to pool sensitivity and specificity. We reported 95% prediction intervals (PIs), assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Artificial Intelligence tool (QUADAS-AI; Viknesh Sounderajah [Imperial College London]), and evaluated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework for diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included: 17 for SLE classification, 5 for LN diagnosis, and 7 for NPSLE discrimination. In the primary task-stratified analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94; 95% PI 0.56-0.99), and pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96; 95% PI 0.69-0.99), with low heterogeneity (I²=23.9% and 22.9%, respectively). DL models showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.95, compared with 0.88 and 0.94 for traditional ML models. Certainty of evidence was high for most analyses but low for LN diagnosis because of inconsistency and imprecision. All studies were retrospective, and only 9 of 29 (31%) performed independent external validation. Overall risk of bias was high or unclear in 22 of 29 (75.9%) studies. No study reported model calibration, decision-curve analysis, or net clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: ML models showed promising diagnostic accuracy across 3 distinct SLE-related tasks, but wide PIs, limited external validation, and pervasive risk of bias restrict conclusions about real-world generalizability. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized tasks and reference standards, independent external validation, and formal assessment of calibration and clinical utility are required before clinical implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence in treatment prediction for skeletal Class III malocclusion: A systematic review.

In skeletal Class III patients, treatment options range from orthodontics to orthognathic surgery. Choosing the optimal approach requires a comprehensive clinical evaluation, which may be supported by AI tools. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of AI models in predicting the need for orthognathic surgery and in identifying predictors influencing treatment decisions. A PRISMA-guided electronic database search (PubMed, Web of Science; 2009-2024; English/French) was performed to identify studies using machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) on cephalometric and clinical data. After screening and assessment for eligibility, 15 studies were critically appraised. Model performance was summarized using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). ML algorithms (particularly Random Forest and XGBoost) and DL models (ResNet-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs)) achieved high accuracy for predicting surgical need. Frequently selected predictors included Wits appraisal, ANB angle, the maxillomandibular ratio (Mx/Md), overjet, and the divergence of the lower gonial angle. AI methods show promise for assisting treatment decisions in Class III malocclusion, with Random Forest and XGBoost performing well on tabular cephalometric data and CNNs on imaging. Larger, multicentre datasets and external validation are needed to improve reliability, address bias, and support clinical implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Development and external validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting chronic kidney disease progression in the Korean population.

BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification models, such as the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE), exhibit variable performance across ethnic groups and fail to capture dynamic clinical trajectories. This study aimed to develop and validate a Korean-specific machine learning (ML) model for predicting chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression using an ensemble approach. METHODS: We used electronic health records from Seoul National University Hospital for model development (n = 28,209) and the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) CKD cohort for external validation (n = 3,960). The primary outcome was a composite of ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or progression to end-stage renal disease within 2 years. A soft-voting ensemble of four ML algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest) was developed. RESULTS: The ensemble model demonstrated robust discrimination in internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.939; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.934-0.944), significantly exceeding the KFRE (AUROC, 0.879-0.884). External validation in the KoGES cohort showed comparable discrimination (AUROC, 0.859; 95% CI, 0.798-0.914) versus KFRE (four-variable AUROC, 0.882; 95% CI, 0.818-0.935). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified baseline eGFR, serum creatinine, eGFR slope, albumin, and hemoglobin as key prognostic features, supporting a complementary framework using KFRE for community screening and the ML model for hospital-based risk stratification. CONCLUSION: The ensemble ML model accurately predicts short-term CKD progression in Korean patients. By incorporating longitudinal features and ensemble learning, it provides a precise alternative to Western-derived equations, particularly in tertiary care settings.

Chronic kidney failure↗

PubMed2006

Machine learning and word sense disambiguation in the biomedical domain: design and evaluation issues.

BACKGROUND: Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is critical in the biomedical domain for improving the precision of natural language processing (NLP), text mining, and information retrieval systems because ambiguous words negatively impact accurate access to literature containing biomolecular entities, such as genes, proteins, cells, diseases, and other important entities. Automated techniques have been developed that address the WSD problem for a number of text processing situations, but the problem is still a challenging one. Supervised WSD machine learning (ML) methods have been applied in the biomedical domain and have shown promising results, but the results typically incorporate a number of confounding factors, and it is problematic to truly understand the effectiveness and generalizability of the methods because these factors interact with each other and affect the final results. Thus, there is a need to explicitly address the factors and to systematically quantify their effects on performance. RESULTS: Experiments were designed to measure the effect of "sample size" (i.e. size of the datasets), "sense distribution" (i.e. the distribution of the different meanings of the ambiguous word) and "degree of difficulty" (i.e. the measure of the distances between the meanings of the senses of an ambiguous word) on the performance of WSD classifiers. Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were applied to an automatically generated data set containing four ambiguous biomedical abbreviations: BPD, BSA, PCA, and RSV, which were chosen because of varying degrees of differences in their respective senses. Results showed that: 1) increasing the sample size generally reduced the error rate, but this was limited mainly to well-separated senses (i.e. cases where the distances between the senses were large); in difficult cases an unusually large increase in sample size was needed to increase performance slightly, which was impractical, 2) the sense distribution did not have an effect on performance when the senses were separable, 3) when there was a majority sense of over 90%, the WSD classifier was not better than use of the simple majority sense, 4) error rates were proportional to the similarity of senses, and 5) there was no statistical difference between results when using a 5-fold or 10-fold cross-validation method. Other issues that impact performance are also enumerated. CONCLUSION: Several different independent aspects affect performance when using ML techniques for WSD. We found that combining them into one single result obscures understanding of the underlying methods. Although we studied only four abbreviations, we utilized a well-established statistical method that guarantees the results are likely to be generalizable for abbreviations with similar characteristics. The results of our experiments show that in order to understand the performance of these ML methods it is critical that papers report on the baseline performance, the distribution and sample size of the senses in the datasets, and the standard deviation or confidence intervals. In addition, papers should also characterize the difficulty of the WSD task, the WSD situations addressed and not addressed, as well as the ML methods and features used. This should lead to an improved understanding of the generalizablility and the limitations of the methodology.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2026

Development and validation of a serum peptidomic signature for early detection of asymptomatic ovarian cancer: A multi-center prospective study.

Early detection of asymptomatic ovarian cancer (asym-OC) remains a critical challenge, the failure of which underlies its high mortality. Performing serum peptidomic profiling of 843 participants in the cohort SOCFCP, we distill 1,081 initial features into a 7-marker panel for asym-OC detection via a biology-informed machine-learning (ML)-based feature selection strategy. Three markers significantly revert toward non-OC levels after surgery. Integrating the panel with age, CA125, and HE4, we develop and externally validate (n = 159) a LightGBM model, ProMS+. For early-stage OC detection, ProMS+ shows a specificity of 92.6% at 95.0% sensitivity, outperforming CA125 (44.7%), HE4 (11.2%), and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) (24.0%), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.993. In a simulated high-risk population (n = 100,000; OC prevalence = 1%), ProMS+ yields a high AUC (0.983) and a higher positive predictive value than CA125, HE4, and Age + CA125 + HE4 combined model (0.201 vs. 0.027, 0.090, and 0.064). ProMS+ offers a promising, non-invasive, and interpretable approach for the early detection of asym-OC.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Role of Artificial Intelligence for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV), encompassing physical, sexual, emotional and economic abuse, remains a pervasive global health concern. Traditional prevention efforts face obstacles such as underreporting, delayed detection and limited personalised support. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer new opportunities to enhance IPV prevention. AIM: This systematic review maps and synthesises evidence on AI-driven tools in IPV prevention based on studies published between 2004 and 2024. METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science. Eligible studies explicitly evaluated AI technologies targeting IPV prediction, screening, intervention or support delivery. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Of 1304 records initially identified, 41 studies met eligibility criteria. AI applications ranged from machine learning (ML) for risk prediction and natural language processing (NLP) for IPV detection in clinical and social media data, to image analysis for forensic evaluation and chatbot-based support. Predictive modelling demonstrated strong discriminative performance, while NLP-based screening detected IPV with notable sensitivity. Chatbots showed feasibility and user acceptability, but evidence of their direct impact on reducing IPV incidence was limited, with one randomised controlled trial showing a modest reduction. Key challenges identified included algorithmic bias, data privacy risks and barriers to integration across health and social care systems. DISCUSSION: AI-informed interventions show promise for improving IPV detection, risk assessment, and scalable support, but questions remain about long-term effectiveness, ethical fairness, transparency and equitable implementation. Future interdisciplinary research should address these concerns to responsibly deploy AI in IPV prevention. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed, culturally responsive care and provider training in AI applications. Nurse-led innovation and policy advocacy will be crucial for safe, equitable integration of AI in IPV prevention.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2025

Machine learning on multiple epigenetic features reveals H3K27Ac as a driver of gene expression prediction across patients with glioblastoma.

Epigenetic mechanisms play a crucial role in driving transcript expression and shaping the phenotypic plasticity of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), contributing to tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance. These mechanisms dynamically regulate the expression of key oncogenic and stemness-associated genes, enabling GSCs to adapt to environmental cues and evade targeted therapies. Importantly, epigenetic reprogramming allows GSCs to transition between cellular states, including therapy-resistant mesenchymal-like phenotypes, underscoring the need for epigenetic-targeting strategies to disrupt these adaptive processes. Understanding these epigenetic drivers of gene expression provides a foundation for novel therapeutic interventions aimed at eradicating GSCs and improving glioblastoma outcomes. Using machine learning (ML), we employ cross-patient prediction of transcript expression in GSCs by combining epigenetic features from various sources, including ATAC-seq, CTCF ChIP-seq, RNAPII ChIP-seq, H3K27Ac ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq. We investigate different ML and deep learning (DL) models for this task and ultimately build our final pipeline using XGBoost. The model trained on one patient generalizes to other 11 patients with high performance. Notably, H3K27Ac alone from a single patient is sufficient to predict gene expression in all 11 patients. Furthermore, the distribution of H3K27Ac peaks across the genomes of all patients is remarkably similar. These findings suggest that GSCs share a common distributional pattern of enhancer activity characterized by H3K27Ac, which can be utilized to predict gene expression in GSCs across patients. In summary, while GSCs are known for their transcriptomic and phenotypic heterogeneity, we propose that they share a common epigenetic pattern of enhancer activation that defines their underlying transcriptomic expression pattern. This pattern can predict gene expression across patient samples, providing valuable insights into the biology of GSCs.

Glioblastoma↗

PubMed2026

AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is the most common chronic liver disease around the world, affecting 33.6% of the adult population (95% CI: 28.1%-39.5%; I 2 = 99.9%), or roughly one in three. The extent of the liver damage is variable, from simple steatosis to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, formerly NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Early diagnosis is essential to prevent serious liver damage. Traditional diagnostic techniques such as liver biopsy, imaging, and biomarker testing are all invasive, costly, reduced sensitive to early-stage disease, and they also have variability among observers. Modern diagnostic and prognostic approaches based on the principles of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and specifically on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have enabled multimodal approaches integrating clinical, imaging and molecular data. This scoping review conducted per PRISMA-ScR guidelines, synthesizes findings from 73 studies (search window 2020-2026) across three dimensions: clinical data driven models, imaging-based classifiers (ultrasound, CT and MRI), and multi-omics (genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics) techniques. Moreover, emergence of models such as U-Net and LiverNet 2.x, classification models like DeepLiverNet and BiLSTM models, as well as transformer frameworks and the identification of biomarkers models are also described. This study also investigates challenges such as data heterogeneity, data interpretability, fairness and real-world clinical application. Finally, important areas of research opportunities and future directions are highlighted to present a developing clinically applicable, explainable and ethical AI solutions to manage MASLD.

MASLD↗