SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31Linked to original sources

PubMed1986

The use of intraluminal prosthesis in the surgical management of aortic dissection.

The treatment of acute aortic dissection requires expeditions and reproducible operations aimed at avoiding rupture of the dissection or its antegrade or retrograde progression. In 12 type A and 11 type B dissections the aorta was repaired using an intraluminal prosthesis to reduce the risk of hemorrhage and its related complications. Overall mortality rates were 33% in type A and 36% in type B patients, similar to that observed in patients operated with other techniques, but the incidence of intraoperative bleeding was possibly reduced and the cross-clamping time was significantly shorter. This method of repair is a sound alternative to conventional anastomotic suturing, particularly in clinically compromised patients and in the hands of surgeons on call, who may lack the experience of dealing with a particularly fragile aortic wall.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Endoluminal repair of infrarenal AAA in the presence of aortic dissection.

PURPOSE: To report a challenging case of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with a commercial stent-graft in the face of thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. CASE REPORT: A 73-year-old patient was admitted because of acute descending thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection. He was also found to have an 8-cm infrarenal AAA. After initial medical management of the acute aortic dissection, the patient underwent endoluminal AAA repair with an AneuRx stent-graft. The completion angiogram showed that the graft was deployed in the false lumen; this complication was treated with fenestration of the intimal flap, establishing flow through both lumens. The patient's recovery was uneventful, and he was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Follow-up at 1 year with computed tomographic angiography documented a stable descending thoracic aorta with a suggestion of a type II endoleak and no change in the aneurysm volume. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the feasibility of endograft repair of infrarenal AAA with a modular stent-graft in the presence of aortic dissection extending below the renal arteries.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Limitations of chest radiography in discriminating between aortic dissection and myocardial infarction: implications for thrombolysis.

It has been stated that chest radiographic features of aortic dissection are a contraindication to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Excluding aortic dissection could significantly delay such treatment in patients who would benefit from thrombolysis. Initial chest radiographs of 18 patients with acute aortic dissection and 25 patients with acute myocardial infarction were evaluated. The radiographs were studied by two experienced radiologists for signs of aortic dissection. No radiographic signs or combinations of signs accurately distinguished aortic dissection from myocardial infarction. Patients with chest radiographic signs suggesting aortic dissection but with clinical features suggesting myocardial infarction should not be denied the benefits of immediate intravenous thrombolysis.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2001

Emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection: neurologic complications and early mortality.

BACKGROUND: Acute type A aortic dissection is a surgical emergency still associated with high postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to investigate factors for hospital mortality and neurologic deficit in patients undergoing emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients (age range, 20 to 82 years) operated on for acute type A aortic dissection over a 6-year period were evaluated. Univariate and stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted among 32 perioperative variables. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgical procedures under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion was used in 23 patients (27.1%) and 18 patients (21.2%), respectively. Forty-three patients underwent arch/hemiarch replacement and the ascending aorta was replaced in 42 patients. Overall mortality rate was 25.9% (22 of 85 patients). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that lack of cerebral perfusion (p = 0.021) and postoperative renal failure (p = 0.006) were the best predictors for hospital death. Twenty-one patients (24.7%) experienced neurologic accidents. The risk factor for postoperative neurologic complication was lack of cerebral perfusion (p = 0.013). Hospital mortality was 13% (3 of 23 patients) and 16.7% (3 of 18 patients) in the antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion groups (p > 0.05) and neurologic deficit was 13% (3 of 23 patients) and 11.1% (2 of 18 patients), respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and neurologic complications in patients undergoing emergent operation for acute type A aortic dissection were reduced when cerebral perfusion was used with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains the most common aortic catastrophe, as generally believed, and to detect any improvement in outcomes compared with previously reported population-based data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We determined the incidence, operative intervention rate, and long-term survival rate of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with a clinical diagnosis of AAD initially made between 1980 and 1994. The incidence of degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) rupture was also delineated. We compared these results with other population-based studies of AAD, degenerative TAA, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. RESULTS: During a 15-year period, we identified 177 patients with thoracic aortic disease. We focused on 39 patients with AAD (22% of the entire cohort) and 28 with TAA rupture (16%). The annual age- and sex-adjusted incidences were 3.5 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.6) for AAD and 3.5 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.9) for TAA rupture. Thirty-three dissections (85%) involved the ascending aorta, whereas 6 (15%) involved only the descending aorta. Nineteen patients (49%) underwent 22 operations for AAD, with a 30-day case fatality rate of 9%. Among all 39 patients with AAD, median survival was only 3 days. Overall 5-year survival for those with AAD improved to 32% compared with only 5% in this community between 1951 and 1980. CONCLUSIONS: In other studies, the annual incidences of TAA rupture and AAA rupture are estimated at approximately 3 and 9 per 100,000 persons, respectively. This study indicates that AAD and ruptured degenerative TAA occur with similar frequency but less commonly than ruptured AAA. Although timely recognition and management remain problematic, these new data suggest that recent diagnostic and operative advances are improving long-term survival in AAD.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: aortic aneurysm, sinus of Valsalva aneurysm, and aortic dissection.

The extant nomenclature for aortic aneurysms, sinus of valsalva aneurysms, and aortic dissections is reviewed for the purpose of establishing a unified reporting system. The subject was debated and reviewed by members of the STS-Congenital Heart Surgery Database Committee and representatives from the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery. All efforts were made to include all relevant nomenclature categories using synonyms where appropriate. Classification was based on morphology, histology, anatomic location, etiology, and acuity. A comprehensive database set is presented that is based on a hierarchical scheme. Data are entered at various levels of complexity and detail that can be determined by the clinician. These data can lay the foundation for comprehensive risk stratification analyses. A minimum database set is also presented that will allow for data sharing that would lend itself to basic interpretation of trends. Outcome tables relating diagnoses, procedures, and various risk factors are presented.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed1993

Aortic dissection in cardiac allograft recipients. A report of two cases.

Aortic dissection in cardiac allograft recipients has not been reported previously, to our knowledge. We have observed two fatal aortic dissections in heart transplant recipients: one in the immediate postoperative period and one occurring 5 years after transplantation. We discuss the clinical presentations, pathologic findings, possible pathogenetic mechanisms, and risk factors. Because the frequency of aortic dissection after heart transplantation appears to be relatively low (< 1%), such disease may be clinically unsuspected. Given the uniformly poor outcome observed in our two patients, we suggest that increased awareness of the possible development of aortic dissection after heart transplantation may result in improved survival of affected patients.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed2000

The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease.

CONTEXT: Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening medical emergency associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Data are limited regarding the effect of recent imaging and therapeutic advances on patient care and outcomes in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the presentation, management, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection. DESIGN: Case series with patients enrolled between January 1996 and December 1998. Data were collected at presentation and by physician review of hospital records. SETTING: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, consisting of 12 international referral centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 464 patients (mean age, 63 years; 65.3% male), 62.3% of whom had type A dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presenting history, physical findings, management, and mortality, as assessed by history and physician review of hospital records. RESULTS: While sudden onset of severe sharp pain was the single most common presenting complaint, the clinical presentation was diverse. Classic physical findings such as aortic regurgitation and pulse deficit were noted in only 31.6% and 15.1% of patients, respectively, and initial chest radiograph and electrocardiogram were frequently not helpful (no abnormalities were noted in 12.4% and 31.3% of patients, respectively). Computed tomography was the initial imaging modality used in 61.1%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 27.4%. Mortality of patients with type A dissection managed surgically was 26%; among those not receiving surgery (typically because of advanced age and comorbidity), mortality was 58%. Mortality of patients with type B dissection treated medically was 10.7%. Surgery was performed in 20% of patients with type B dissection; mortality in this group was 31.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Acute aortic dissection presents with a wide range of manifestations, and classic findings are often absent. A high clinical index of suspicion is necessary. Despite recent advances, in-hospital mortality rates remain high. Our data support the need for continued improvement in prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute aortic dissection.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Acute aortic dissection without intimal tear.

A case of acute aortic dissection without intimal tear is reported. A 68-year-old woman with acute onset of Stanford type-B aortic dissection was admitted. Because of progressive anemia and pleural leakage, an operation was performed. False lumen of the descending thoracic aorta was occupied with fresh hematoma, but no sign of an intimal defect was found. Although aortic dissection without intimal tear has been reported via angiography, CT scan, MRI, and autopsy, surgically confirmed cases of this type of dissection have been rarely reported.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Type A acute aortic dissection: immediate and mid-term results of emergency aortic replacement with the aid of gelatin resorcin formalin glue.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term results of operation for type A acute aortic dissection with the aid of gelatin resorcin formalin glue. METHODS: Emergency operation was carried out in 84 patients during the last 8 years. Fifty-five patients (65.5%) had mild-to-moderate aortic regurgitation. Gelatin resorcin formalin glue was applied to both the proximal and distal aortic stumps. We evaluated the presence of aortic regurgitation and the patency of the distal false lumen at the time of this study. The survival and reoperation-free rates were also assessed. In case of late reoperation, aortic wall samples of the glued area were examined histologically. RESULTS: Ascending to hemiarch replacement were performed in 71 patients (84.5%). Total aortic arch and root replacement were required in 13 and 7 patients, respectively. Overall hospital mortality was 6.0% (5 patients). Late death was observed in 12 patients (14%). Reoperation for redissection in the aortic root, development of aortic regurgitation, and enlargement of the distal false lumen occurred in 1, 3, and 1 patient, respectively. Histologic examination showed no evidence of infiltration of inflammatory cells in the glued area. Computed tomography scan revealed a patent distal false lumen in 8 (14%) of 58 patients. Echocardiography detected moderate aortic regurgitation in 2 patients. The actuarial survival rate at 1, 5, and 8 years was 85.5%, 80%, and 60.0%, respectively. The reoperation-free rate at 8 years was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of emergency aortic replacement with gelatin resorcin formalin glue have shown reasonable early and late mortality and reoperation rates. There was no histologic evidence of adverse tissue reactivity by gelatin resorcin formalin glue.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed1980

Ulcerlike projections: a precursor angiographic sign to thoracic aortic dissection.

The clinical and plain radiographic findings of thoracic aortic dissection may not be specific; thoracic aortography is the definitive diagnostic procedure. Ulcerlike projections of contrast material are not commonly found on thoracic aortography, but may be a precursor angiographic sign of dissection. Two patients with ulcerlike outpouchings are presented. In one, the evolution of aortic dissection was documented by three serial aortograms. It began with a small "ulcer" in the ascending aorta that became larger and finally progressed into the typical angiographic appearance. In the other, thoracic aortography demonstrated an ulcerlike projection in the ascending aorta. In both cases, the diagnosis of dissecting hematoma was confirmed by surgery and pathologic examination of the resected specimens. Thoracic aortography in several projections is necessary for demonstration of these ulcerlike outpouchings because they may be evident in only one projection. Conceivably, their recognition may permit earlier diagnosis of aortic dissection and the institution of appropriate treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

[Aortic regurgitation caused by prolapsed noncoronary cusp associated with dissecting aortic aneurysm treated by placing a prosthetic graft onto the anulus: report of a case].

A 70-year-old man with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) associated with dissecting aortic aneurysm underwent a radical operation. AR was thought to be due to dilated sinotubular junction and prolapsed noncoronary cusp caused by dissecting flap extended into the sinus of Valsalva. At operation, the noncoronary cusp was slightly prolapsed into the left ventricle, but all cusps were seemed to be thin and pliable. An isolated "tongue shaped" graft was placed onto the anulus of the noncoronary cusp, and a 26 mm Woven Dacron graft was used to replace the ascending aorta. Postoperative angiogram showed mild AR and improved left ventricular (LV) function. This procedure was effective to repair AR caused by prolapsed noncoronary cusp without elongation or thickening of the valve.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Can the principles of evidence-based medicine be applied to the treatment of aortic dissections?

Surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissections has improved early survival from 10-20 to approximately 80%. Data supporting several other treatment recommendations in patients with aortic dissection, however, are less convincing. We hypothesized that applying strict principles of evidence-based medicine would invalidate most of the recommendations in these published papers. We conducted a literature search asking three questions: (1) Is the use of routine circulatory arrest and an 'open distal' anastomosis technique better than traditional aortic cross clamping? (2) Does a persistent false lumen in the distal aorta wall have an adverse influence on long-term event-free survival? and (3) Is primary surgical or medical treatment of patients with Stanford acute type B dissections preferable in terms of long-term event-free survival? We searched Entrez Pubmed (National Library of Medicine) for all papers on these topics from 1980 to January 2003. Screening 3164 papers identified using the search terms 'aortic dissection' and 'treatment' yielded 15 papers fulfilling a set of a priori inclusion criteria. No study had a design that allowed unequivocal conclusions; moreover, the heterogeneity in study design and patient populations precluded formal meta-analysis. The difficulties inherent in conducting stringent clinical studies addressing various treatment strategies for patients with aortic dissection hamper their quality and weaken their recommendations for different treatment options. Specifically, no conclusive evidence exists favoring use of an open distal anastomosis in patients with acute type A dissections or complete elimination of flow in the distal aortic false lumen; similarly, medical therapy of patients with acute type B aortic dissections has no proven advantage over surgical treatment.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1993

Chronic type A aortic dissection: an unusual complication of cocaine inhalation.

Acute aortic pathology temporally related to cocaine inhalation may lead to frank rupture or acute aortic dissection. This is a report of an unusual case of a 43-year-old man who presented 9 weeks after experiencing a tearing sensation in his chest while smoking cocaine. The diagnosis was chronic type A aortic dissection with 4+ aortic insufficiency. The successful surgical management included resuspension of the aortic valve and placement of a Dacron tube graft in the ascending aorta such that flow was maintained distally in both the true and false lumens.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1993

Mechanical assist device for right ventricular failure after acute aortic dissection.

Acute myocardial ischemia and infarction due to retrograde coronary artery dissection are uncommon complications after ascending aortic dissection. A case of acute aortic dissection with massive right ventricular failure successfully treated by replacement of the ascending aorta and postoperative right ventricular mechanical support is presented. Although mechanical assistance may be hazardous after ascending aortic replacement, because of the need of anticoagulation, it represents a valid therapeutic option when severe right ventricular failure due to acute myocardial infarction ensues.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

D-dimer in acute aortic dissection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Laboratory testing plays a minor role in the assessment of aortic dissection. Its main value is in the exclusion of other diseases. Following an incidental observation, we systematically investigated the relationship between elevated d-dimer levels and acute aortic dissection. DESIGN: We prospectively tested d-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection (10 patients). In addition, we investigated 14 patients who had received a confirmed diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection during the previous 5 years, in whom d-dimer testing had been performed for differential diagnosis. Thirty-five patients with acute chest pain of other origin served as a control group. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Twelve patients had type A dissection (Stanford classification), and 12 patients had type B. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A d-dimer analysis was performed (Tina-quant assay; Roche Diagnostics; Mannheim, Germany) [normal limit of the assay, 0.5 micro g/mL]. The result of the d-dimer test was positive (ie, > 0.5 micro g/mL) in all patients (sensitivity of the test, 100%) with a mean value of 9.4 micro g/mL and a range of 0.63 to 54.7 micro g/mL. The degree of the elevation was correlated to the delay from the onset of symptoms to laboratory testing (mean, 12.6 h; range, 1 to 120 h) and showed a trend to the extent of the dissection, but not to the outcome (14 patients could be discharged; 10 patients died). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observation, we suggest that testing for d-dimer should be part of the initial assessment of patients with chest pain, especially if aortic dissection is suspected. A negative test result makes the presence of the disease unlikely.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1989

[The value and limitation of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosis of dissecting aortic aneurysm].

The diagnostic value of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated in 29 patients with dissecting aortic aneurysm (DeBakey type I; 4, type II; 1, type IIIa; 6, type IIIb; 18) who were studied consecutively from May 1987 to August 1988. An intimal flap was demonstrated in all 29 cases. DeBakey type classification could be recognized in 26 of 29 patients (89.7%). The entry of aortic dissection could be identified in 26 of 29 patients (89.7%). The differentiation between true and false lumen could be performed in all 29 cases. The introduction of color Doppler and pulsed Doppler echocardiography has opened up an additional possibility, in particular an analysis of flow pattern of the lumen was valuable in differentiation between true and false lumen. TEE was also valuable in evaluation of operative procedure by means of intraoperative-TEE. The capability to visualize the lesion of descending aorta was superior to any other conventional diagnostic method such as CT, MRI, AOG. However, there were difficulties in scanning the distal part of the ascending aorta and aortic arch, and in identifying the reentry of arotic dissection except for DeBakey type IIIa dissection. Since transthoracic echocardiography was valuable in diagnosis of cardiac tamponade, aortic regurgitation, and DeBakey type I dissection, the diagnostic method of a combination of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography seems to be more valuable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Interventional management of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Modern high-resolution imaging techniques have provided new insights into the pathogenesis of aortic dissection during recent years. Distinct pathologic entities or potential precursors of classic false-lumen aortic dissection such as intramural hematoma or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer have been identified. As a result, a novel classification according to Svensson used in addition to the standard differentiation according to DeBakey or Stanford has been introduced. Due to improved diagnostic imaging, preoperative mortality has decreased but mortality remains substantial (up to 1.4% per hour within the first 2 days) related to complications of aortic dissection such as aortic rupture, bleeding, pericardial tamponade, critical branch vessel ischemia, multiorgan failure, and myocardial infarction. EXAMINATIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography as well as intravascular ultrasound are used for a complete vascular "staging" of patients with aortic dissection after initial stabilization (with or without surgery). New catheter-based interventional techniques have been developed to improve the poor prognosis of aortic dissection: 1 Percutaneous balloon fenestration (PTF) of the intimal flap improves perfusion in case of bowel, limb, or renal ischemia. 2. Aortic stent-graft placement allows for occlusion of the intimal entry tear by implantation of a membrane-covered, self-expanding stent-graft to initiate progressive thrombus formation within the false lumen. Compared to the traditional surgical approaches, both techniques have a low complication rate. The development of these techniques may help to further improve to decrease patients' morbidity and mortality.

Aortic Dissection↗