Frequency of citation and outcome of cholesterol lowering trials.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Data on associations between genetic predisposition to high blood pressure (BP) and hypertension and its complications in non-European populations are limited. The current study investigated associations between polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for BP and risks of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease in Northeast Asian populations. METHODS: A genome-wide association study of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) was conducted using data from the KoGES (Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study). Results were meta-analyzed using summary statistics from Biobank Japan to construct PRSs. RESULTS: Compared with a PRS in the lowest 5 percentiles, a PRS in the highest 5 percentiles was associated with an increased risk of hypertension (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44 [95% CI, 1.67-3.56] for PRS for SBP; and HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.20-2.62] for PRS for DBP) and earlier onset of hypertension (by a median of 8.5 years for PRS for SBP and 8.0 years for PRS for DBP). These associations remained significant when continuous PRS was analyzed. The genetic risk of hypertension incidence was attenuated by moderate to vigorous physical activity. Adding the PRS for BP to the clinical risk factors improved the predictive value for hypertension (both area under the curve values, 0.787 [95% CI, 0.771-0.803]; P=0.063 for PRS for SBP and [95% CI, 0.771-0.804]; P=0.031 for PRS for DBP). However, neither PRS for SBP nor PRS for DBP was associated with the incidence of cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The PRS for BP was associated with a higher risk of incident hypertension and earlier-onset hypertension in a Northeast Asian population. PRS may facilitate early identification and targeted management of individuals at high risk of developing hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Gut metabolites and symbionts are indispensable for host health, yet the precise identification of keystone metabolites and construction of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) to enhance disease resistance remains limited. RESULTS: Using Litopenaeus vannamei as a model, we identified pyruvic acid and DL-glutamine (1:2) as keystone metabolites by borrowing the microbial ecology principles of bio-indicators and driver taxa. Dietary supplementation with these metabolites sufficiently protected shrimp from white feces syndrome (WFS). Multi-omics analyses demonstrated that keystone metabolites exerted positive effects by enriching beneficial Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis, Bacillus subtilis and Nioella nitratireducens, strengthening the gut network stability, and enhancing shrimp immunity, which collectively potentiated WFS resistance. The recruited three strains were consumers and producers of the two keystone metabolites, and discriminative strains between healthy and diseased shrimp across global datasets. A SynCom constructed from the three strains (4:3:2) replicated the efficacy of keystone metabolites. Both keystone metabolites and SynCom elevated shrimp gut and hepatopancreas lipoxin A4 (LXA4) levels, which suppressed the pro-inflammatory transcription factor AP-1, as validated by in vivo inhibition assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that precisely designed keystone metabolites enhance shrimp disease resistance through the recruitment of key symbionts-LXA4-AP-1 axis. The rationally designed keystone metabolites and SynCom are compelling biocontrol solutions in improving host disease resistance. Video Abstract.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk is heavily influenced by genetics, yet current association tests have explained only parts of its heritability. We developed MEVA (Meta-Evolutionary Action), a meta-analytic framework that integrates three complementary methods-EAML, Sigma-Diff, and GeneEMBED-to assess the functional burden of protein-coding variants using evolutionary data. MEVA was applied to exome data from 28,115 T2DM cases and 28,115 controls in the UK Biobank (UKB), identifying 101 genes (p < 1e-5). MEVA outperformed its component methods, each of which substantially outperformed a conventional burden test (MAGMA), in recovering known T2DM genes (AUROC = 0.925) and maintaining robustness in progressively smaller cohorts (AUROC = 0.917). MEVA showed significant enrichment for T2DM-related loci (p = 6.8e-10, p = 2.0e-34), protein interactions (z = 4.6, z = 4.2), pathways (p = 1.3e-6, z = 2.0), phenotypes (p = 1.3e-21, z = 9.1), and literature mentions (z = 7.2). Replication in 16,915 T2DM cases and 16,915 controls from All of Us (AoU) yielded 99 genes (p < 1e-5), 23 of which were also recovered in the UKB cohort - far exceeding random chance. These included established genes (SLC30A8, WFS1, HNF1A) and less-characterized candidates (NRIP1, ADAM30, CALCOCO2, TUBB1, ZFP36L2, WDR90). Notably, NRIP1 loss-of-function variants were associated with increased T2DM risk in both the UKB (OR = 1.09, FDR = 5.4e-4) and AoU (OR = 1.09, FDR = 0.046), and TUBB1 and CALCOCO2 gain-of-function variants showed consistent risk effects (FDR < 0.05). Pathway analyses revealed convergence on endoplasmic reticulum chaperone complexes (FDR = 0.02) and Hippo signaling (FDR = 8.5e-4). Finally, all 177 candidate genes were functionally prioritized using ten orthogonal criteria to guide experimental follow-up. These results demonstrate that combining complementary, impact-aware association tests increases sensitivity, improves replication, and expands the catalog of genetic risk factors for T2DM.
Inorganic arsenic (iAs) is a toxic environmental pollutant linked to serious health risks, prompting global regulatory efforts. This study identifies major health conditions associated with iAs exposure using text network analysis, and assesses health risk assessments through an umbrella review and dose-response analysis. It synthesizes previous systematic reviews to offer a broader perspective on iAs-related health effects. An optimized text network analysis-based search strategy was applied across multiple databases to identify relevant systematic reviews. An umbrella review framework was employed to synthesize and reinterpret findings across systematic reviews. The methodological quality of included systematic reviews was assessed using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 tool. Extracted data on study characteristics, exposure levels, and risk estimates were analyzed to evaluate the dose-response relationship between iAs exposure and health outcomes. From 922 systematic reviews, 36 were included and categorized into 10 health condition groups. For example, seven SRs found a significant dose-response relationship between iAs and bladder cancer, with one systematic review reporting relative risks of 2.70, 4.20, and 5.80 at 10, 50, and 150 µg/L, respectively. Individual study analysis further showed that each 10 µg/L increase in iAs raised bladder cancer risk by 3.11 % (p=0.003). iAs exposure is associated with hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and adverse fetal outcomes. Dose-dependent increases in bladder cancer, lung cancer, and hypertension risks were observed. These findings support more precise health risk assessments and regulatory strategies.
BACKGROUND: Nonpharmacologic interventions are important for treating knee pain due to osteoarthritis or after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and extended reality (XR) technology may enhance treatments for these indications. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate XR interventions for pain due to knee osteoarthritis (KOA) or for recovery after TKA. METHODS: Databases were searched through May 2023 and updated in December 2025. Eligible trials evaluated XR interventions to treat KOA pain or after TKA. We classified interventions by depth of immersion and clinical mechanism. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to determine the certainty of evidence for prioritized outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed when ≥3 studies evaluated similar comparisons, outcomes, and time points. RESULTS: Eligible trials addressed KOA (k=12) or recovery after TKA (k=9). Sample sizes ranged from 36 to 306 participants, and most studies had a follow-up of ≤3 months. Nineteen studies assessed pain-related functioning and pain intensity, and 5 assessed adverse events (AEs). For KOA, 10 studies examined interactive digital rehabilitation (IDR), and 2 examined virtual reality (VR)-digitally augmented exercise (DAE). IDR for KOA may result in better pain-related functioning (low certainty of evidence [COE]; pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.59, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.06; prediction interval [PI] -1.72 to 0.55; k=5) and lower pain intensity at 6-8 weeks (low COE; pooled SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.00; PI -1.39 to 0.47; k=4). VR-DAE for KOA (k=2) produced inconsistent results (very low COE). For post-TKA studies, 5 examined IDR, 2 examined VR-DAE, 1 examined VR-distraction, and 1 examined VR-psychoeducation. Post-TKA IDR may result in better pain-related functioning (low [k=4] and moderate COE [k=1]) but little to no difference in pain intensity (low-moderate COE; pooled SMD at 3-4 months -0.12, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.52; PI -1.63 to 1.27; k=3). VR-psychoeducation probably results in lower pain at 4 weeks (moderate COE; k=1), and VR-distraction may result in 6 months (low COE; k=1), whereas VR-DAE produced mixed findings (k=2; very low COE). IDR was not associated with AEs, and VR may not be associated with AEs for KOA (high and low COE), though AE reporting was uncommon (k=5) and evidence was very uncertain for post-TKA. CONCLUSIONS: IDR may augment treatment for KOA and post-TKA recovery, and VR may benefit post-TKA rehabilitation. This review is the first to stratify by level of immersion, clinical mechanism, and follow-up duration and to systematically evaluate AEs. IDR may be ready for integration into KOA care, while use after TKA needs more evidence. Randomized controlled trials with implementation outcomes could determine how XR interventions can be used for KOA, whereas trials evaluating efficacy and AEs are needed before their use for post-TKA.
BACKGROUND: Rare diseases affect many individuals and pose major challenges in diagnosis and treatment, especially in Global South countries where health care resources are limited. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) has significantly advanced diagnostic accuracy and clinical care for rare diseases globally; however, its implementation and impact within the Global South context remain insufficiently studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the use, clinical benefits, challenges, and implementation outcomes of targeted NGS for diagnosing and managing rare diseases in Global South populations. Specifically, it seeks to quantify the diagnostic yield of NGS, examine its influence on subsequent clinical decision-making, and identify principal barriers to, and facilitators of, the implementation of targeted NGS approaches in these contexts. METHODS: This protocol follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We will systematically search PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between 2005 and 2025 that report on the use of targeted NGS in Global South population with rare diseases. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and evaluation of risk of bias by using QUADAS-2 for diagnostic accuracy studies and the risk of bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies. Meta-analyses will be conducted to estimate pooled outcomes for diagnostic yield, with heterogeneity assessed using random effects models. Heterogeneity will be further examined through visual inspection of forest plots and by evaluating the chi-square test and I² statistic. RESULTS: The protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251078455). Database search or screening, data extraction, and data synthesis are planned to commence in June 2026 and conclude by September 2026. Study findings will synthesize the diagnostic yield, clinical impact, and contextual determinants influencing the implementation of targeted NGS in Global South health care settings. CONCLUSIONS: This review will provide evidence on the application, advantages, limitations, and clinical outcomes of targeted NGS for individuals affected by rare diseases in countries of the Global South. The finding will identify priorities for capacity strengthening, policy development, and future genomic research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251078455; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251078455. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/85150.
Nursing care activities have been proved to cause increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) which could be detrimental to the patient's health. Because positioning is one of the activities that causes the greatest pressure changes it was evaluated in this study. Cumulative increases also occur when nursing care activities are carried out in quick succession. The analysis of the data and literature suggest that the backrest position with the head of the bed elevated 30 to 45 degrees is the best position for a patient with increased ICP. If further research should prove that this position has a negative influence on the cerebral perfusion pressure, these recommendations will have to be revised.
Genome-wide association studies identified a melanoma- and nevus count-associated locus on chromosome band 9q34.13. Fine-mapping and melanocyte expression data collectively suggest two potential causal genes with opposite association with risk: higher levels of Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 (RAPGEF1) and lower levels of uridine-cytidine kinase 1 (UCK1). Colocalization analyses and conditional TWAS suggest multiple causal cis-regulatory sequence variants in partial linkage disequilibrium (LD) to each other. Melanocyte capture-HiC and CRISPR-inhibition demonstrated regulatory interactions between fine-mapped variants and the RAPGEF1 and UCK1 promoters. Focusing on RAPGEF1, we demonstrate RAPGEF1 expression promotes melanocyte growth and drives malignant transformation of human immortalized melanocytes. Following treatment with human EGF, RAPGEF1 overexpression activated both RAP1 and RAS. Further, we show RAPGEF1 expression is significantly enriched in melanomas lacking strongly activating RAS-MAPK mutations, suggesting that RAPGEF1 may promote oncogenic RAS-MAPK signaling in melanomas. Furthermore, in these tumors, we provide preliminary evidence to support the prognostic relevance of RAPGEF1 expression in patients lacking RAS or BRAF mutations. Together with other recent studies, these data suggest that germline variation influencing RAS activation may play a key role in nevus development and melanoma risk.
At present, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to draw reliable conclusions about the long-term risks of lipid lowering therapy. Many so-called "long-term" trials only cover a few years of treatment, comparative studies versus placebo are very rare and the notification of acute events in the context of pharmacovigilance does not provide information about the long-term risk. However, analysis of large scale primary or secondary prevention trials, the Lipid Research Clinics study with cholestyramine, the Helsinki cardiological study with gemfibrozil, the Coronary Drug Project with clofibrate and nicotinic acid, has not shown any significant differences between the treatment and control groups, in particular with regards to the prevalence of malignant disease. These reassuring observations contradict those of the WHO study with clofibrate: a significant increase in the incidence of cancer, especially gastrointestinal, is observed in the treatment group. Therefore, despite the absence of confirmed long-term clinical or biological adverse effects of lipid lowering drugs (apart from the WHO clofibrate study), the physician must remain vigilant, especially as the long-term risks are difficult to assess.
Treatment of hyperlipidaemia is even more important after than before myocardial infarction. Currently available data should be confirmed by larger studies including women and lasting over 10 years. Analysis of the results would be facilitated by studying comparable groups with respect to left ventricular function and severity of the coronary disease. The total serum cholesterol should optimally be under 2 g/l and the LDL-cholesterol under 1.30 g/l. However, coronary artery disease is a multifactorial condition and the correction of only one predisposing factor, albeit a major one, is not sufficient for effective prevention.
Experimental studies have demonstrated regression of atheromatous lesions with diet and lipid lowering drugs. In order to confirm these results clinically, reliable angiographic methods of analysis must be developed along two lines: quantitative by consensus between independent "blinded" experts, qualitative by digitalizing radiological images. Given the reproducibility of these methods, a variation of 17 to 20% in the size of the atheromatous plaques should be required to affirm a change. Five studies have been performed in patients with atherosclerosis associated with variable degrees of hyperlipidaemia and compared with a control group. NHLBI type II: 59 out of 146 patients with type II hyperlipoproteinaemia were treated with cholestyramine for 5 years with reduction of the progression of > 50% stenosis but no evidence of regression (6%). CLAS: 80 out of 160 coronary patients were treated with cholestipol and nicotinic acid for 2 years and a reduction of progression and a regression of lesions were observed in 16% of cases. Nikkila: 28 coronary patients with hyperlipidaemia were given clofibrate or nicotinic acid for a 7 year period, stabilising the evolution but with no signs of regression. FATS: 74 of 120 coronary patients with apolipoprotein B concentrations of over 1.25 g/l were given lovastatine-cholestipol or nicotinic acid-cholestipol for 2.5 years: regression of coronary lesions was observed in 32 to 39% of cases depending on the treatment administered. Olsson: reported the same results for femoral atheroma with treatments associating fenofibrate and nicotinic acid: 20% regression and reduction of progression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Mortality rates vary with serum cholesterol levels: the causal nature of this relationship is studied by prospective studies (analysis of associations) and unifactorial primary prevention trials (experimentation to determine causality). In prospective studies all cause mortality is often increased at low and high cholesterol levels because of the inverse relationships of this factor with cardiovascular mortality (positive) and non-cardiovascular mortality (negative). Coronary death increases proportionally to serum cholesterol levels in all populations, including those with low cholesterol levels, in both sexes and at all ages. The relationship with cerebrovascular mortality seems to depend on the clinical feature: increased mortality rate due to cerebral haemorrhage in patients with low serum cholesterol and a positive correlation with cerebral thrombosis. Mortality due to cancers is generally negatively correlated to serum cholesterol levels with a significant increase in mortality in patients with a low serum cholesterol. This relationship often becomes less significant as the time between measurement and death increases. Mortality due to violent causes is not usually related to serum cholesterol. The multitude of possible causes of confusion makes any causal interpretation of data illusory. Experimentation by unifactorial primary prevention trials is essential for any etiological research but none of the trials performed to date was designed to analyse the effect of lowering serum cholesterol on global or coronary mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Many retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between HDL-cholesterol and coronary risk. The predictive value of HDL-cholesterol is observed both in asymptomatic subjects and those with a primary vascular event. Several genetic abnormalities may be responsible for low HDL cholesterol (under 100 mg/dl or 0.26 mmol/l) or for a less severe hypoalphalipoproteinaemia. Despite some very low values, these rare causes of HDL deficiency are not all atherogenic and serve to emphasize the complexity of HDL metabolism. The protective role of HDL is explained by a number of mechanisms such as their role in the reverse transport from the peripheral tissues to the liver, their anti-oxidant effect and the increase in prostacyclin levels. The correction of isolated hypoalphalipoproteinaemia by drugs is controversial, but associated hyperlipidaemic states would be an indication to use drugs which increase the HDl-cholesterol the most.
Several studies have reported an inverse relationship between serum cholesterol levels and the risk of cancer, especially of the colon (Seven Countries, Framingham, Chicago studies, London Whitehall Study, Paris prospective study, New Zealand Maori, Honolulu Heart Study, Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program, ...). For example, in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (361 662 men), the global mortality graph was J-shaped, higher at either side of the 4.6-5.1 mmol/l value of serum cholesterol. This increased mortality with lower serum cholesterol levels was due to increased numbers of death from cancer. However, when the relationship is studied with respect to the time elapsed between the cholesterol measurement and death from cancer, the relative risk of death in the lowest decile with respect to the average of the following deciles, decreases with the period between measurement of the serum cholesterol and time of death. The negative relationship between serum cholesterol and death by cancer, very significant for deaths occurring within the first 5 years, disappeared almost completely for deaths occurring after 5 years. Other trials designed mainly to examine cardiovascular risk, and concerning smaller numbers, have not demonstrated this inverse relationship between serum cholesterol and cancer. This negative relationship between serum cholesterol and cancer must be acknowledged. It is weak and concerns mainly colonic cancer, especially in men in the elderly age groups. Several explanations have been put forward: influence of the combination of factors, competition of risk of death by other causes, chance, alteration of normal biological function of the cell membrane.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Experimental studies have shown the regression of atherosclerosis in animals given a cholesterol-rich diet and then given a normal diet or hypolipidemic therapy. Despite favourable results of clinical trials of primary prevention modifying the lipid profile, the concept of atherosclerosis regression in man remains very controversial. The methodological approach is difficult: this is based on angiographic data and requires strict standardisation of angiographic views and reliable quantitative techniques of analysis which are available with image processing. Several methodologically acceptable clinical coronary studies have shown not only stabilisation but also regression of atherosclerotic lesions with reductions of about 25% in total cholesterol levels and of about 40% in LDL cholesterol levels. These reductions were obtained either by drugs as in CLAS (Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study), FATS (Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study) and SCOR (Specialized Center of Research Intervention Trial), by profound modifications in dietary habits as in the Lifestyle Heart Trial, or by surgery (ileo-caecal bypass) as in POSCH (Program On the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias). On the other hand, trials with non-lipid lowering drugs such as the calcium antagonists (INTACT, MHIS) have not shown significant regression of existing atherosclerotic lesions but only a decrease on the number of new lesions. The clinical benefits of these regression studies are difficult to demonstrate given the limited period of observation, relatively small population numbers and the fact that in some cases the subjects were asymptomatic. The decrease in the number of cardiovascular events therefore seems relatively modest and concerns essentially subjects who were symptomatic initially. The clinical repercussion of studies of prevention involving a single lipid factor is probably partially due to the reduction in progression and anatomical regression of the atherosclerotic plaque.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Analysis of epidemiological studies enables definition of the optimal serum cholesterol level between 2 and 2.2 g/l (5.2 and 5.7 mmol/l). Higher levels are associated with an exponential risk of coronary artery disease: lower levels should be interpreted with caution because of the J-shaped curve of global mortality reported in several trials. In primary prevention, therapeutic trials have clearly shown that a significant reduction in the number of coronary event may be obtained by lowering the serum cholesterol (15 for every 1,000 patients treated). In trials performed to date this benefit has not resulted in any gain in global mortality. In secondary prevention, the benefits of lowering serum cholesterol on the incidence of coronary disease seems identical in terms of relative risk to that observed in primary prevention. Nevertheless, the benefits in terms of absolute risk are much higher because of the high incidence of coronary mortality in a patient population with a previous coronary event. Thus, for 1,000 patients treated, there are 50 less cardiac events and this is reflected in a reduction of global mortality of about 20 for every 1,000 patients treated.
Serum cholesterol intervention studies have been mainly performed in middle-aged men. Is the extrapolation of these results to men aged 20 to 30 years justified? Atherosclerosis is a process which continues throughout life. It is clear that increased serum cholesterol levels are associated with a higher coronary risk. In addition, serum cholesterol levels increase with age up to 60 years old. Do young men obtain the same benefits from medical intervention as older men? Therapeutic trials have been performed in middle-aged men. The increase in life expectancy associated with a 6.7% lowering of the serum cholesterol by life-long dietary restrictions would only be 4 months in 20 year old subjects at high risk (hypertension, smokers, low HDL cholesterol). With a 20% reduction in serum cholesterol, the gain would be 12 months. There is no reason for not extrapolating acquired data in the over 30s to 20 to 30 year old subjects. Due to the fact that young subjects are exposed to the risk for longer periods, it is advisable to treat their hypercholesterolaemia even more seriously than that of older patients.