SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 793 records · Page 44Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Care concordant with guidelines predicts decreased long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Data are sparse regarding the long-term benefit of care concordant with clinical practice guidelines in patients presenting with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UAP/NSTEMI), particularly in the general care setting. We extended follow-up in a preexisting cohort of 275 patients hospitalized with primary UAP/NSTEMI. Using Cox models, we compared long-term mortality between patients who received care concordant with > or =80% of 8 important guideline recommendations during the index hospitalization and patients who did not. Among all study patients, 68% received guideline-concordant care. During follow-up (median 9.4 years) 49% of patients died. Patients with UAP/NSTEMI who received guideline-concordant care had significantly decreased long-term mortality compared with those who received guideline-discordant care (hazards ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 to 0.64). Guideline-concordant care remained associated with decreased mortality after adjusting for other predictors of long-term mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.84) and after adjustment for the propensity to receive guideline-concordant care (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.88). The benefit of guideline-concordant care relative to discordant care was preserved in high-risk populations shown to be less likely to receive guideline-concordant care, including patients with advanced age, congestive heart failure, elevated serum creatinine, and prior myocardial infarction. Care concordant with UAP/NSTEMI clinical practice guidelines is associated with substantially improved long-term survival. Our findings endorse the approach adopted by authors of clinical practice guidelines in generalizing evidence-based medicine to usual clinical care. In firmly establishing the benefit of consensus guidelines, the foundation is set for efforts to improve practitioner compliance with these standards.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Evaluating adherence to the Dutch guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of laryngeal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline for laryngeal carcinomas was introduced in the Netherlands late 1999. The objective of this guideline was to ensure uniformity in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated whether clinical practice changed according to the recommendations of this guideline and whether it succeeded in its aim. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In five out of eight Dutch university hospitals, chart data of 459 patients treated before the guideline introduction were compared to data of 363 patients treated after the guideline introduction. RESULTS: Patient and tumour characteristics were comparable among both groups. In general, the guideline recommendations were properly complied with. The patients treated before the guideline introduction were actually also for a large part already treated according to the guideline's recommendations. After its introduction, several changes according to the guideline were observed: increased rates of reassessment of biopsy samples taken in local hospitals, psychological screening (although still only performed in 10.5% of patients), application of accelerated radiotherapy schedules, clinical trial treatments, function-preserving treatments, and decreased rates of total laryngectomy, and annual chest X-rays during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although a causal relationship cannot be established in this kind of observational studies, several positive changes were observed after the introduction of the guideline, and therefore the guideline seems to have contributed to more uniformity. The largest changes were seen for the guideline recommendations based on the highest levels of evidence.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Antibiotic use, hospital admissions, and mortality before and after implementing guidelines for nursing home-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare two strategies for implementing guidelines for nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) and to measure outcomes associated with treatment in accordance with the guidelines. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Ten skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from a single metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with an episode of pneumonia acquired more than 3 days after admission to SNF (N = 350): 226 preintervention episodes of pneumonia and 116 postintervention episodes. INTERVENTIONS: Multi-faceted education intervention including small-group consensus process limited to physicians and a similar intervention that included physicians and nurses within randomly selected SNFs. MEASUREMENTS: Antibiotic use at diagnosis compared with the guidelines, hospital admission, severity of pneumonia, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Data were complete for 344 episodes of NHAP. For the preintervention group (n = 226), 62.2% (79/127) of the episodes were treated with parenteral antibiotics (PA) when PA were recommended by the guidelines and 57.6% (57/99) of episodes were treated with oral antibiotics (OA) when OA were indicated by the guidelines. Postintervention, treatment with PA and OA according to the guidelines was not significantly different between the two groups of randomized SNFs. A multivariate analysis comparing PA use pre- and postintervention for all SNFs, adjusted for variation in the frequency and severity of pneumonia, found significantly more of the postintervention episodes were treated with PA in accordance with the guidelines (P < .02). A preintervention significant difference in 30-day mortality observed between episodes with indications for PA (37.8% (48/127)) and episodes with indications for OA (6.1% (6/99)) (P < .001) was not present postintervention (11.5% (6/52); (23.8% (15/64); P = .06). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality preintervention and postintervention for episodes with guideline indications for OA (P = .35) or for PA (P = .05) (P = .16 for multivariate analysis). The difference in PA use was not associated with significant differences in hospital admissions for episodes on NHAP. CONCLUSION: The increase in the use of PA provides evidence that care within SNFs can be significantly changed using standard quality improvement techniques. Use of the guidelines did not significantly affect mortality. The addition of a practical severity of NHAP model or a change in reimbursement structure may enhance the guidelines' impact on hospitalization for NHAP. The financial benefits available with use of the guidelines will be limited unless the guidelines contribute to a reduction in rates of hospitalization.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1998

Use of guidelines in primary care--practitioners' perspectives.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Concern about the inadequate take-up of guidelines in general practice has concentrated on problems arising from the process of their development and implementation. However, these perspectives fail to take account of the needs, attitudes and problems of GPs themselves. In this study we aimed to identify barriers to the use of guidelines and opportunities for tackling them, from the point of view of the GP, so that future guideline development and policy could be more sensitive to the needs of GPs in the environment in which they work. METHOD: Twenty in-depth semi-structured interviews were audiotaped with GPs from within the Avon Health Authority area, representing GPs with different backgrounds and working environments. The transcribed data collected were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Utilization of guideline information is complex. GPs' appraisals of the value of guidelines interact with prior knowledge and beliefs, practicalities of existing information storage and retrieval systems, and individual working practices. Conditions where guidelines are most likely to be referred to may be those either very rarely or very commonly presenting in general practice. Key issues for the uptake of guidelines in the consultation are: general preference for certain formats of presentation; reputability and ownership; use of guidelines in shared decision-making; scope for computer-based systems; and GPs' attitudes to time pressures on information-seeking in relation to tolerance of uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Local initiatives might usefully explore the possibilities of supporting development of guideline-retrieval systems customized for individual GPs or practices. Novel means of stimulating 'ownership' and demonstrating reputability should be sought. The analysis provides a framework for understanding the complexities of the processes of GPs' use of guidelines in practice which can be useful in explaining the results of trials of guideline effectiveness. Guideline implementation occurs in the context of conflicting pressures for clinical autonomy and professional standardization and quality improvement.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2003

Adherence to local hospital guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis: a multicentre audit in Dutch hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To study the adherence to local hospital guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, and explore reasons for non-adherence. METHODS: A prospective, multicentre audit of elective procedures, without prior suspicion of infection, was carried out in 13 Dutch hospitals. By reviewing medical, anaesthetic and nursing records, and medication charts, the prescription of antibiotics was compared with the local hospital guideline on antibiotic choice, duration of prophylaxis, dose, dosing interval and timing of the first dose. RESULTS: Between January 2000 and January 2001, 1763 procedures were studied. Antibiotic choice, duration, dose, dosing interval and timing of the first dose were concordant with the hospital guideline in 92%, 82%, 89%, 43% and 50%, respectively. Overall adherence to all aspects of the guideline, however, was achieved in only 28%. The most important barriers to local guideline adherence were lack of awareness due to ineffective distribution of the most recent version of the guidelines, lack of agreement by surgeons with the local hospital guidelines, and environmental factors, such as organizational constraints in the surgical suite and in the ward. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, although adherence to separate aspects of local hospital guidelines for surgical prophylaxis in the Netherlands is favourable, overall adherence to all parameters is hard to achieve. Adherence to guidelines on dosing interval and timing needs improvement, in particular. To increase the quality of antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, effort should be put into developing guidelines acceptable to surgeons, in adequately distributing the guidelines and to facilitating logistics. Audits of surgical prophylaxis may help hospitals identify barriers to guideline adherence.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Prescribing behaviour according to Dutch and European guidelines on the management of hypercholesterolaemia (1992-1999).

BACKGROUND: The success of the full implementation of a new guideline may depend on the observed discrepancy between daily medical practice developed before the release of the guideline and new treatment recommendations issued by the guideline. AIM: To assess whether the initiation of statin treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in an elderly population was in agreement with guidelines. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort study consisting of 7983 subjects aged>or=55 years. In the period 1992-1999, all patients starting statins for primary prevention were selected. Treatment eligibility was established according to Dutch guidelines based on considerations of cost effectiveness (1998) and European guidelines based on clinical effectiveness (1998 and 2003). RESULTS: Only 5.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1, 8.3] of the 299 subjects starting statins for primary prevention met the eligibility criteria of the Dutch guidelines. Most patients (92.0%, 95% CI 88.9, 95.1) met the criteria of the 2003 European guidelines. Patients who did not meet any eligibility criteria were female and had one or less cardiovascular risk factor, except for two patients with total cholesterol levels<5 mmol l-1 prior to start of statin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of statins was in agreement with the most recent European guidelines in over 90% of elderly patients who started statins for primary prevention, but in only 6% of these patients according to the Dutch guidelines. As long as existing guidelines are as discrepant as they are now, variation in agreement between physicians' prescribing and guideline recommendations is unavoidable.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

An audit of clinical practice in the management of head injured patients following the introduction of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) recommendations.

A prospective study was conducted by the Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) in A&E of Edinburgh Royal Infirmary to examine clinical practices in the management of head injured patients pre- and post-inception of the SIGN guidelines published in August 2000.1607 patients attended the department in two separate one month periods at equal intervals pre- and post-guidelines publication. The majority of patients with a SIGN indication for admission were admitted (93% pre- and 92% post-guidelines). For skull x ray (SXR) requests, in the pre-guidelines group, 92% of admitted patients with a SIGN indication for x ray had a SXR: this figure dropped to 79% post-guidelines. 36% of patients with a SIGN indication for CT actually had a scan pre-guidelines: this figure increased to 64% post-guidelines.57% of patients pre-guidelines and 44% of patients post-guidelines were discharged from A&E in accordance with the SIGN recommendations. Of patients admitted for neurological observations, this increased from 50% pre- to 88% post-guidelines. Of patients who were discharged "inappropriately", only one re-presented and was subsequently admitted but required no neurosurgical intervention. Despite publication of the SIGN guidelines and positive reinforcement in A&E and at ward level, practice has not changed significantly. Where our practice did not adhere to SIGN recommendations, there was no untoward sequelae. For published national guidelines to be effective, a formal audit structure with regular feedback is necessary to ensure a continued change in clinical practices.

Craniocerebral Trauma↗

PubMed2000

Canadian oncologists and clinical practice guidelines: a national survey of attitudes and reported use. Provincial Lung Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario.

PURPOSE: To determine (1) Canadian oncologists' attitudes toward practice guidelines, (2) oncologists' self-reported use of practice guidelines and, (3) physicians' characteristics and attitudes associated with self-reported use of practice guidelines. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered postal survey was administered to Canadian oncologists. Main outcome measures were level of agreement with 8 descriptive statements about guidelines, score on the attitudinal scale of the guideline of Tunis et al., and physicians' stated use of guideline. chi(2) and logistic regression procedures were used to explore the relationship between physician characteristics and use of guidelines. RESULTS: Over 80% of respondents agreed that they were good educational tools, convenient sources of advice, intended to improve quality of care; over 40% agreed that they were unbiased syntheses of expert opinion. Conversely, 42, 26, 20 and 16% felt they were intended to cut costs, were oversimplified cookbook medicine, were too rigid to apply to individual patients, and a challenge to physicians' authority, respectively. Forty-one percent reported using practice guidelines routinely or most of the time. Use was associated with positive attitudes about guidelines, receiving medical school training abroad and being a radiation oncologist. CONCLUSION: Canadian oncologists were quite positive about practice guidelines and reported using them frequently. Our results suggest that use of guidelines by oncologists may be related to attitudes about guidelines in general, specialty within oncology and country of medical school training.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Use of practice guidelines in the primary care of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Several guidelines have been published for the care of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); however, few data describe adoption of practice guidelines. Our study sought 1) to describe primary care diagnosis and management of ADHD, 2) to determine whether the care is in accordance with American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) practice guidelines, and 3) to describe factors associated with guideline adherence. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of 1374 primary care physicians in Michigan. Main outcome measures were reported adherence to practices specified in the AAP guidelines; ADHD practice patterns; and other measures, including attitudes about parent, teacher, and community influences on ADHD diagnosis and treatment. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess patient and physician factors associated with adherence to guideline components. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60%. The majority (77.4%) of primary care physicians were familiar with AAP guidelines on ADHD, and many (61.1%) reported incorporating the guidelines into their practice. Differences were apparent by specialty: 91.5% of pediatricians were familiar with the guidelines in contrast to 59.8% of family physicians. The majority of clinicians reported practices consistent with individual components of the diagnostic and treatment guidelines. However, when adherence to multiple components was analyzed together, only 25.8% of clinicians reported routine use of all 4 diagnostic components in the survey. In addition, some physicians continue to use diagnostic modalities that are currently not recommended for routine evaluation of school-aged children with ADHD--continuous performance testing, neuroimaging, and laboratory tests (eg, thyroid, lead, or iron testing). With regard to ADHD treatment, the majority (66.6%) of respondents reported routine recommendation of pharmacotherapy and titration of medications in the first month when prescribed (81.3%). However, just over half (53.1%) reported routine follow-up visits (3-4 times per year) for children who have ADHD and are taking medications. Most (53.4%) clinicians also recommended behavioral therapy for children who had a diagnosis of ADHD. Patterns of specialty differences were less consistent for treatment components: pediatricians were more likely to recommend medications, but family physicians reported more frequent follow-up evaluations for children who receive medications. There were no specialty differences in recommendations for behavioral therapy. In addition to physician specialty variations, differences in management were apparent by practice type and other demographic characteristics. There were few significant associations between adherence to guideline components and physician attitudes about parent, teacher, or community influences. However, these factors were noted by many respondents. Only 32.5% agreed that their community had adequate, accessible mental health resources. Half (50.1%) of the physicians reported that insurers limit coverage for assessment and treatment of ADHD. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians generally report awareness of pediatric ADHD guidelines and follow these clinical practice recommendations. However, some physician variations are apparent, and areas for improvement are noted. Many primary care physicians report poor access to mental health services, limited insurance coverage, and other potential system barriers to the delivery of ADHD care. Additional study is needed to confirm provider-reported data; to determine what constitutes high-quality, long-term management of this chronic condition; and to confirm how reported practices associate with long-term outcomes for children with ADHD.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia: are they reflected in practice?

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common, costly, and clinically serious. Several national and international practice guidelines have been developed to promote more appropriate, cost-effective care for patients with CAP. This article compares and contrasts eight international practice guidelines for the management of CAP, describes the extent to which recommendations are reflected in practice, and proposes explanations for non-adherence to guidelines. We found consistency in recommendations across all the guidelines for the management of patients with CAP requiring intensive care. In this setting, all guidelines recommend chest radiography, sputum Gram stain and culture, blood cultures, testing for Legionella pneumophila, and timely administration of antibiotics active against both typical (i.e. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae) and atypical organisms (i.e. Legionella spp., Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae). Recommendations for the management of the average inpatient with pneumonia were more variable, with the greatest differences between the North American and European guidelines. The North American guidelines (in contrast to European ones), recommended empiric treatment of typical and atypical organisms in all inpatients. There were also differences in policies regarding the necessity of chest radiography, sputum studies, and serologic testing. Some guidelines explicitly embrace the use of prediction rules to inform the decision to hospitalize, while others do not. Some of these admission decision algorithms focus on identifying low risk patients, while others are most concerned with high risk patients. There was also considerable variation in the specificity and operationalization of clinical criteria for switching from parenteral to oral antibiotics or judging appropriateness for discharge. Many recommendations for key management decisions tended to lack explicit, objective, and actionable criteria that could be easily implemented in real world practice. Review of the pneumonia literature revealed that physician performance of guideline-recommended best practices is often suboptimal. Administration of timely antibiotics (< or =8 hours of presentation) and use of first-line antibiotics occurred in 75-85% and 18-79% of cases, respectively. Collection of blood cultures within 24 hours of presentation and prior to administration of antibiotics was achieved in 69-83% and 63-82% of cases, respectively. Screening the eligibility of CAP patients for hospital-based pneumococcal and influenza vaccination occurred on average in 11 and 14% of hospitalizations, respectively, in the US. Lack of awareness of guidelines, conflicting advice among them, and lack of specific, objective, actionable recommendations most likely contribute to nonadherence to CAP guidelines. Increased attention to these factors will be needed if professional society practice guidelines are to fulfill their promise as tools for improving the quality and outcomes of care for patients with pneumonia.

Community-Acquired Infections↗

PubMed2001

General practitioners and clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of general practitioners in Harare, Zimbabwe, towards the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPG's). DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: General practitioners in private practice within the urban Harare (Zimbabwe) environs. SUBJECTS: Two hundred and thirty two general practitioners in Harare, Zimbabwe. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The response to a questionnaire enlisting attitudes to CPGs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were sent to 232 general practitioners. Of these, 137 (59.1%) returned a completed questionnaire. Among the respondents, 95.6% felt that general practitioners should be involved in the development of guidelines, 72.6% had read at least one guideline, 65.9% were prepared to use guidelines in their practice, 61.6% thought that guidelines would improve their treatment ability, and 59.7% thought that guidelines would improve their knowledge of disease. 76.5% felt that the government should not legislate, 66.2% felt that guidelines reduce practitioners' flexibility and 57.9% felt that guidelines would not improve their diagnostic ability. CONCLUSION: The respondents were, in general, favourably disposed towards CPGs. Most had already read some guidelines, and about two thirds were prepared to use them. Almost all respondents felt that general practitioners should be involved in the development of guidelines for use in general practice. These general practitioners felt that guidelines were likely to help them treat patients than to make a diagnosis. Despite these favourable attitudes, many practitioners felt that guidelines would limit their personal flexibility in caring for patients. Organisations developing or implementing CPGs in general practice should address these concerns.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Evidence-based guidelines and critical pathways for quality improvement.

Clinical practice guidelines have a long and distinguished tradition in pediatrics. Currently, the American Academy of Pediatrics has developed more than 15 practice guidelines and more than 250 clinical policy statements. In the past, practice guidelines have been used to improve care through the dissemination of evidence-based, clinically effective practices to pediatric practitioners. In the current environment this purpose has been broadened to include cost reduction, standardization of practice, and reduction of medical liability. This has led to both confusion and distrust on the part of the pediatrician. Practice guidelines are best understood as a tool to insure that children receive evidence-based care. They are best used in association with a set of outcome and performance measures that provide feedback to clinicians and allow for modification of the guidelines to meet the needs of the local patient population. The quality of practice guidelines is directly dependent on the quality of the medical evidence supporting the recommendation. Unfortunately only a small percentage of the evidence supporting practice guidelines comes from randomized clinical trials with the majority of the evidence coming from expert clinical panels. The success of practice guidelines in improving care for children has yet to be convincingly demonstrated. Currently, there is a dearth of well designed studies that document the effectiveness of practice guidelines. Their ultimate effectiveness will depend on both an improved evidence base and effective strategies for rapid dissemination of the recommendations. The development of evidence-based practice guidelines does not insure that it will have a major impact on physician practice. In the past, effective dissemination of new knowledge has been a long process, often taking years. This cycle time can be dramatically shortened through the development of networks of practice sites that share knowledge and experience in the implementation of practice guidelines and the use of strategies that take advantage of key groups in the dissemination process. When used appropriately, practice guidelines can provide an important adjunct to clinical research by facilitating the dissemination of new clinical findings and can provide an important platform for encouraging innovations in patient care.

Critical Pathways↗

PubMed1992

Comparison of exposure assessment guidelines for pesticides.

The field of exposure assessment of pesticides has become well established in the past decade. Consequently, government agencies and industry groups have identified the need for guidelines for conducting studies that assess mixer/loader/applicator exposure to pesticides, as well as the exposure of individuals to residues. This paper reviews guidelines on mixer/loader/applicator exposure studies issued by the International Group of National Associations of Manufacturers of Agrochemical Products, the National Agricultural Chemicals Association, the U.S. EPA, and the World Health Organization. Mention is also made of Canadian exposure guidelines in preparation. Also reviewed are two guidelines for conducting indoor occupant exposure studies, one by the National Agricultural Chemicals Association and one by Health and Welfare Canada. The only available guideline (EPA) on assessing pesticide exposure to workers upon reentry into treated fields is also reviewed. These guidelines are reviewed and compared as to criteria for requirements of exposure studies, methodologies recommended for dermal, inhalation, and biological monitoring, quality assurance and quality control, the use of surrogate data, data reporting, and exposure calculations. From this comparison, it is evident that there has been little significant progress in the area of methodologies used for dermal exposure monitoring. The use of patches as suggested by Durham and Wolfe (1962) is still accepted and widely used, despite its limitations. However, relatively recent research in this area has shown that the fluorescent tracer technique (Fenske et al. 1986a,b) and use of full-body dosimeters may help in overcoming some of these limitations. The tracer technique is mentioned in the EPA guidelines and full-body dosimeters are addressed by EPA, WHO, and NACA. Biological monitoring can also overcome many of the limitations of passive dosimetry, but all guidelines stress the need for extensive knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the pesticide before this approach can be used. Rapid advancement has been made in quality assurance/quality control and analytical techniques. This has increased the level of confidence placed in exposure estimates and is evidenced by the detailed requirements of quality assurance and quality control in most of the guidelines reviewed. Guidelines on conducting indoor occupant exposure studies deal extensively with methodologies for collecting residue samples, but do not make concrete recommendations for estimating human exposure based on these residues. More research is required before the subject can be adequately dealt with in guidelines. It is encouraging that this research is being coordinated among industry, academia, and government. Further research is also needed in determining exposure to pesticides during reentry into treated areas in order to develop further guidelines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Air Pollution, Indoor↗

PubMed2004

Clinical practice guidelines on the initial assessment and treatment of urinary incontinence in women: a US focused review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical practice guidelines from prominent US organizations for the initial management of urinary incontinence (UI) in women and compare them with recommendations from the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). The challenge of implementing guidelines in the US was also identified. METHODS: The medical literature was reviewed to identify relevant practice guidelines on the initial management of UI in community-dwelling women according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Guidelines were compared with the ICI international gold standard relating to patient identification, initial therapy, and recommendation for specialist referral. Literature on programs to implement guidelines into clinical practice was reviewed. RESULTS: There is general agreement on how females with UI should be initially managed based on guidelines, monographs, and technical bulletins from prominent US organizations. Though these recommendations are more than 5 years old, they are fairly similar to the latest guidelines developed by the ICI in 2001. Minor discrepancies are mainly related to the lack of updating US guidelines based on most recent knowledge. Implementing existing guidelines into clinical practice presents a challenge. CONCLUSION: No evidence-based practice guidelines from prominent US organizations on the initial management of UI in women exist that are less than 5 years old, but the latest versions are in alignment with recent ICI/WHO guidelines. Although optimization of UI management may be the goal of guidances, the debate remains over whether these recommendations are actually effective in modifying practice. Simplifying and updating guidelines regularly may enhance adaptation in the initial management of UI in women.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

PubMed2006

A systematic review of guidelines for the prevention of heat illness in community-based sports participants and officials.

This paper presents the findings of a systematic review of guidelines on preventing heat illness in sports participants and officials. University library databases and Internet sources were searched for guidelines pertaining to community-based sports, and occupational health and safety, using a comprehensive list of search terms. Guidelines were included if they met the criteria of English language, full text and fully referenced, and dealt specifically with, or could be extrapolated to, prevention of heat illness in sports participants and officials. Guideline inclusion was evaluated by two independent reviewers, who also independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE instrument. Common guideline themes were identified by synthesis and recommendations for each theme were extracted. A synthesis of recommendations for common themes was then undertaken. Thirteen eligible guidelines were included. Thirty-two guidelines were excluded, as they did not provide sufficient information on construction or references. The methodological quality of the included guidelines was variable. The evidence-base of the guidelines varied, reflecting primary and secondary research. While five common heat-illness prevention themes were identified (fluid intake, heat limits, clothing, acclimatisation, precautionary interventions), variable recommendations were made pertaining to these themes. This potentially reflected the variable underpinning evidence of the guidelines. This review highlighted the need for better quality guideline construction related to defensible and transparent evidence sources regarding sports participation in hot weather. The synthesised recommendations cautiously provide a framework of current best evidence upon which sporting organisations internationally can base strategies for safe participation in the heat.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2003

Clinical decision guidelines for NHS cosmetic surgery: analysis of current limitations and recommendations for future development.

Because of increasing demand for publicly funded elective cosmetic surgery, clinical decision guidelines have been developed to select those patients who should receive it. The aims of this study were to identify: the main characteristics of such guidelines; whether and how they influence clinical decision making; and ways in which they should be improved. UK health authorities were asked for their current guidelines for elective cosmetic surgery and, in a single plastic surgery unit, we examined the impact of its guidelines by observing consultations and interviewing surgeons and managers. Of 115 authorities approached, 32 reported using guidelines and provided sufficient information for analysis. Guidelines mostly concerned arbitrary sets of cosmetic procedures and lacked reference to an evidence base. They allowed surgery for specified anatomical, functional or symptomatic reasons, but these indications varied between guidelines. Most guidelines also permitted surgery 'exceptionally' for psychological reasons. The guidelines that were studied in detail did not appreciably influence surgeons' decisions, which reflected criteria that were not cited in the guidelines, including cost of the procedure and whether patients sought restoration or improvement of their appearance. Decision guidelines in this area have several limitations. Future guidelines should: include all cosmetic procedures; be informed by a broad range of evidence; and, arguably, include several nonclinical criteria that currently inform surgeons' decision-making.

Cosmetics↗

PubMed2003

Developing nursing care guidelines for children with Hodgkin's disease.

Oncology patients are generally treated on therapeutic research protocols that detail medical treatment. Nursing care is not clearly defined in these protocols; therefore, the need to develop a set of guidelines specifically for nursing care was identified. To further enhance the specialized care that our pediatric oncology patients receive, we developed nursing care guidelines to accompany specific protocols. One of our most highly accruing protocols is designed to treat patients diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease. In an effort to increase understanding of this clinical trial, decrease potential for errors, and improve overall quality of patient care, nursing care guidelines were created. To develop the nursing care guidelines, nurses created a seven-step process: (1) studied the therapeutic protocol, established ongoing interactions with the principal investigator (brainstorming), reviewed benchmarking, (2) created the first draft of the guidelines, compared the formatting of this particular set of guidelines with those previously developed at this setting (drafting), (3) field tested guidelines, (4) revised the guidelines and subjected them to additional field testing, (5) examined the guidelines for implications related to teaching tools, (6) implemented the guidelines through in-services, and (7) developed an evaluation plan with pre- and post-tests that indicated improved disease and treatment knowledge among participating nurses. Potential contributions from implementing nursing care guidelines that parallel therapeutic protocols include more accurate and complete research data collection and a more defined role for nurses in the protocol development process. The guidelines also offer a useful, detailed resource to deliver complex protocol-directed care.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2004

Clinicians' assessments of practice guidelines in oncology: the CAPGO survey.

OBJECTIVES: Promoting the adoption of clinical practice guidelines is a challenging task. Research shows that adopters' beliefs about guidelines and the process of their development are important predictors of guideline use. Our objective is to report on the development and refinement of an instrument designed to measure oncologists' assessments of guidelines in oncology. METHOD: A theoretically derived instrument was drafted. Oncologists were asked to complete a questionnaire for each draft guideline they were asked to review. Factor analyses and multilevel modeling techniques were undertaken to explore the properties of the instrument and refine it. RESULTS: A total of 488 Ontario clinicians were sent 1494 new questionnaires regarding 34 clinical practice guidelines produced between 1999 and 2002. A refined eighteen-item questionnaire with four stable factors that predicted 60 percent of the variance emerged. The factors are interpreted as guideline quality, applicability, acceptability, and comparative value. The four factors predicted oncologists' endorsements of draft guidelines and, with the exception of quality, predicted their intentions to use the guidelines. As expected, variation in the factor scores could be attributed more to the differences among the oncologist who completed the survey than to the differences among the guidelines themselves. CONCLUSIONS: An instrument composed of four stable and theoretically relevant factors emerged. The findings support the hypothesis that beliefs about guideline attributes and development attributes relate to oncologists' endorsement of and intentions to use guidelines. Our next step is to link the responses of the survey with actual clinical behavior.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗