PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Version, Fetal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

[The Zavanelli maneuver--back to the womb].

The Zavanelli maneuver is the manual replacement of a partially-born fetus due to severe shoulder dystocia. It is described in obstetrical textbooks as being among the last to be tried in a series of maneuvers to rescue the fetus with severe shoulder dystocia, as it is considered a very difficult and heroic maneuver. Few obstetricians have seen it and fewer have done it themselves. It is even more rare when a single obstetrician has done the Zavanelli maneuver repeatedly. Therefore, both experienced obstetricians and certainly young residents are fearful when they have to use this maneuver and can lose control in cases of shoulder dystocia. We have found descriptions of 93 cases of use of the Zavanelli maneuver in vertex presentations. We also describe a recent case in our experience. We conclude that this maneuver is safe and not too difficult to perform even without previous experience. Fetal and maternal complications are few, but there is of course a bias against reporting bad results. We recommend that every obstetrician become familiar with this maneuver so as to feel sure that it is safe for him to use in severe cases of shoulder dystocia.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Study on correction of abnormal fetal position by applying ginger paste at zhihying acupoint A. Report of 133 cases].

Applying fresh ginger paste at Zhihying acupoint before retiring, we treated 133 pregnant women (28 to 38 weeks' gestation) with breech position. There were 118 primigravidas. 238 untreated pregnant women (28 to 32 weeks' gestation) with breech position made up the control group. 113 out of the treated pregnant women had normal fetal position after treatment with 77.4% of correction rate. 48 out of the 113 pregnant women whose fetal position corrected by treatment only received once therapy, accounting for 42.5% of cured cases. Spontaneous correction of fetal position happened in 123 pregnant women of the control group with 51.6% of correction rate. There was a significant difference in the correction rate between study and control groups. (P less than 0.01), suggesting that this therapy is easy, economical, safe, and suitable to popularization at the basic level.

Acupuncture Points↗
PubMed1999

Rare delivery complication caused by an undiagnosed uterine septum.

The role of a uterine septum, and thus, metroplasty in an infertile woman is a debatable issue. A rare complication of fetal malpresentation and impaction in the uterine cavity due to undiagnosed uterine septum in a 24-year-old primigravida who conceived after 3 years of primary infertility is reported. This case highlights that uterine anomalies should be looked for in patients with infertility and reproductive failures, and should be corrected before conception by metroplasty in order to improve reproductive outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prevalence of fetal maldispositions in equine referral hospital dystocias.

A retrospective investigation was performed to determine the population characteristics of horses presented for dystocia at 2 equine referral hospitals and the types of fetal maldispositions among these horses. The study population consisted of a similar number of Thoroughbreds (25%), Standardbreds (24%) and draft horses (22%). Most of the current literature pertaining to equine obstetrics is based on a predominately draft horse population (63%). The latter population appeared to have more transverse presentations (P = 0.06), possibly because of the higher number of draft mares. In our study, 43% (6/14) of the transverse presentations occurred in draft breeds. Furthermore, 18% of the draft mare dystocias (6/33) were transverse presentations whereas only 8% (6/73) of the 2 major light breeds (Thoroughbred n = 3; Standardbred n = 3) had transverse presentation dystocias. Despite the significant breed differences between the 2 populations (P < 0.001), the prevalence of all other fetal maldispositions was not different from those previously reported. Severe dystocia was often multifactorial, with 86% of cases involving malposture and over half (58%) of these involving more than one extremity. Head and/or neck deviation were a major reason for referral. In 30% of cases malposition was a factor, and abnormal presentation was involved in 24% of referrals.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Physical theory as a basis for successful rotation of fetal malpositions and conversion of fetal malpresentations.

Maternal posturing, in which a pregnant or laboring woman assumes specific postures with the intention of altering the position and/or presentation of the fetus within the uterus, is a safe alternative to operative procedures recommended in cases of fetal malpositions and malpresentations. Clinicians and researchers are more likely to help pregnant women understand and perform posturing correctly if they comprehend the theoretical underpinnings of the technique. In maternal posturing, the forces of gravity and buoyancy combine to form a couple that overcomes frictional forces and/or obstructions to allow the fetus to rotate within the uterus to an optimal position or presentation. Integrating an understanding of these physical processes into clinical practice and research according to the recommendations provided here should lead to greater success in correcting malpositions and converting malpresentations.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed2004

Vacuum-assisted delivery: a review.

In 1992, the number of vacuum deliveries overtook the number of forceps deliveries performed in the USA. Most clinical experiences report that the vacuum is safe for both the fetus and the mother when used properly. Correct cup placement on the fetal head and knowing when to abandon the procedure, appear to be key components to conducting a safe and successful vacuum delivery. However, the focus and training that has been afforded forceps deliveries in the past has not been given to the vacuum, because of its perceived 'ease of use'. This apparent lack of understanding has led to increasing numbers of complications associated with its use. In addition, because forceps are being taught less in training programs, fewer and fewer physicians are being trained in the essential skills of operative vaginal delivery. This review is intended to emphasize the correct techniques and skills of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery in an attempt to increase the success and decrease the complications associated with its use.

Birth Injuries↗
PubMed2005

Fetal station at the time of labour arrest and risk of caesarean delivery.

This study aimed to determine whether an unengaged vertex in nulliparous women experiencing active phase labour-arrest increased the caesarean delivery risk. We selected a retrospective cohort of 393 patients. Of these, the presenting part was unengaged in 307, and engaged in 86. Compared with the engaged vertex, unengaged vertex significantly increased the risk of caesarean delivery (27% vrs 7%, P < 0.001, with the risk increased 5 fold [Odds ratio 4.94, confidence intervals 2.08, 11.76]. The risk remains significant after adjusting for confounding variables on multiple logistic regression [adjusted OR 4.71, CI 1.99, 11.01]. However, the degree of unengagement did not significantly affect caesarean rate. (39% at -3 station, 39% at -2 station, and 33% at -1 station; P = 0.577). While an unengaged vertex significantly increased the caesarean delivery rate, the degree of unengagement did not, and the eventual vaginal delivery rate (73%) is high and should prevent hasty recourse to caesarean delivery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic maneuvers to reduce head-to-body delivery time in patients at risk for shoulder dystocia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether prophylactic use of the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure decreased the head-to-body time, as a proxy for shoulder dystocia, in at-risk patients. METHODS: Patients with estimated fetal weights over 3800 g were randomized to undergo the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure before delivery of the fetal head (prophylactic maneuvers) or to undergo maneuvers only after delivery of the head, if necessary (controls). A total of 185 patients were enrolled in the study. After exclusions (eg, abdominal delivery), there were 128 evaluable vaginal deliveries. The study had the power to detect a 30% difference in head-to-body time between groups. RESULTS: Head-to-body delivery times did not differ between the prophylactic and control patients (24 +/- 18 seconds versus 27 +/- 20 seconds, P =.38). In addition, the two groups did not differ in rates of admission of the infant to the special care nursery or in birth injuries. There was a significant increase in the risk of delivering by cesarean for patients randomized to the use of prophylactic maneuvers. CONCLUSION: This study does not support the hypothesis that prophylactic use of the McRoberts maneuver and suprapubic pressure speeds delivery in a population of patients at increased risk for shoulder dystocia.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior).

BACKGROUND: Lateral and posterior position of the baby's head (the back of the baby's head facing to the side or the mother's back) may be associated with more painful, prolonged or obstructed labour and difficult delivery. It is possible that certain positions adopted by the mother may influence the baby's position. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the effects of adopting a hands and knees maternal posture in late pregnancy or during labour when the presenting part of the fetus is in a lateral or posterior position, compared with no intervention. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (November 2004) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of hands and knees maternal posture compared to other postures or controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both review authors assessed trial eligibility and quality. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials of hands and knees posture during pregnancy were included. In one trial involving 100 women, four different postures (four groups of 20 women) were combined for the comparison with the control group of 20 women. Lateral or posterior position of the presenting part of the fetus was less likely to persist following 10 minutes in the hands and knees position compared to a sitting position (one trial, 100 women, relative risk (RR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.37). In a second trial including 2547 women, advice to assume the hands and knees posture for 10 minutes twice daily in the last weeks of pregnancy had no effect on the baby's position at delivery or any of the other pregnancy outcomes measured. No trials of hands and knees posture during labour were included. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of hands and knees position for 10 minutes twice daily to correct occipitoposterior position of the fetus in late pregnancy cannot be recommended as an intervention. This is not to suggest that women should not adopt this position if they find it comfortable. The use of this position during labour has not been addressed in this review. In view of the promising short-term effects of the technique and its simplicity, further trials are justified to determine whether encouraging the use of hands and knees posture during rather than before labour, has any effect on substantive outcomes.

Delivery, Obstetric↗
PubMed1994

Hypnosis and conversion of the breech to the vertex presentation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of hypnosis to convert a breech presentation to a vertex presentation. DESIGN: Prospective case series compared with historical, matched comparison group. SUBJECTS: One hundred pregnant women whose fetuses were in breech position at 37 to 40 weeks' gestation and a matched comparison group of women with similar obstetrical and sociodemographic parameters derived from databases for other studies from the same time period and geographical areas. INTERVENTION: The intervention group received hypnosis with suggestions for general relaxation with release of fear and anxiety. While in the hypnotic state women were asked for the reasons why their baby was in the breech presentation. As much hypnosis was provided as was convenient and possible for the women until they were delivered of the baby or the baby converted to the vertex position. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: A successful conversion for the intervention group was scored when the baby spontaneously converted to the vertex position before delivery or successful external cephalic version. The conversion rate of the intervention group was compared with the comparison group who received standard obstetrical care without the opportunity for hypnosis. DATA ANALYSIS: Parametric testing of statistically significant differences in the rate of conversion between the two groups. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of the fetuses in the intervention group converted to vertex presentation compared with 48% of those in the comparison group. This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Motivated subjects can be influenced by a skilled hypnotherapist in such a manner that their fetuses have a higher incidence of conversion from breech to vertex presentation. Psychophysiological factors may influence the breech presentation and may explain this increased frequency of conversion to vertex presentation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.

BACKGROUND: Management of breech presentation is controversial, both in regard to manipulation of the position of the fetus and the method of delivery. External cephalic version may reduce the number of breech presentations and caesarean sections, but there also have been reports of increased perinatal mortality with the procedure. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of external cephalic version at term on measures of pregnancy outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register was searched. Date of last search: October 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of external cephalic version at term (with or without tocolysis) compared with no attempt at external cephalic version in women with breech presentation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by GJH and checked by RK. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies were included. External cephalic version at term was associated with a significant reduction in non-cephalic births (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.50) and caesarean section (relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.71). There was no significant effect on perinatal mortality (relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.92). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Attempting cephalic version at term appears to reduce the chance of non-cephalic births and caesarean section. There is not enough evidence to assess any risks of external cephalic version at term.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed2000

External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.

BACKGROUND: Management of breech presentation is controversial, both in regard to manipulation of the position of the fetus and the method of delivery. External cephalic version may reduce the number of breech presentations and caesarean sections, but there also have been reports of increased perinatal mortality with the procedure. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of external cephalic version for breech presentation before term on measures of pregnancy outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: October 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of external cephalic version before term (37 weeks gestation) compared with a control group in women with breech presentation before term. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by the reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: Three studies involving 889 women were included. There was no significant effect of external cephalic version before term on the following: non-cephalic presentation (relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.17); caesarean section (relative risk 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.54); low Apgar scores (relative risk 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.49); perinatal mortality (relative risk 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 3.05). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: External cephalic version before term does not appear to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed2005

Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation.

BACKGROUND: Moxibustion (a type of Chinese medicine which involves burning a herb close to the skin) to the acupuncture point Bladder 67 (BL67) (Chinese name Zhiyin), located at the tip of the fifth toe, has been proposed as a way of correcting breech presentation. As caesarean section is often suggested for breech babies due to the potential difficulties during labour, it is preferable to turn the baby before labour starts. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness and safety of moxibustion on changing the presentation of an unborn baby in the breech position, the need for external cephalic version (ECV), mode of birth, and perinatal morbidity and mortality for breech presentation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (30 August 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2004), EMBASE (1980 to March 2004), CINAHL (1982 to March 2004), MIDIRS (1982 to March 2004), CISCOM (9 March 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing moxibustion (either alone or in combination with acupuncture) with a control group (no moxibustion), or other methods (e.g. external cephalic version, acupuncture) in women with a singleton breech presentation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors assessed eligibility and quality of trials independently. The outcome measures were baby's presentation at birth, need for external cephalic version, mode of birth, perinatal morbidity and mortality, maternal complications and maternal satisfaction, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Three trials involving a total of 597 women were included. Due to differences in interventions and sample size it was not appropriate to perform a meta-analysis for the main outcome. Only one trial reported on other outcome measures relevant to this review. Moxibustion reduced the need for ECV (relative risk (RR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.66) and resulted in decreased use of oxytocin before or during labour for women who had vaginal deliveries (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.60). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of moxibustion to correct a breech presentation. Moxibustion may be beneficial in reducing the need for ECV, and decreasing the use of ocytocin, however there is a need for well-designed randomised controlled trials to evaluate moxibustion for breech presentation which report on clinically relevant outcomes as well as the safety of the intervention.

Breech Presentation↗
PubMed2006

Anesthetic and obstetric considerations in a parturient with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome.

PURPOSE: To explain the considerations governing the anesthetic management of pregnant patients with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS). Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome is a congenital vascular disease characterized by cutaneous hemangiomas, venous varicosities, and limb hypertrophy; and is associated with both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. The importance of this diagnosis, including the presence of neuraxial vascular anomalies, is often under-appreciated by both obstetric and anesthesia providers. While regional anesthetic management of patients with KTS has been discussed by others, we present a case in which regional anesthesia presented an unwarranted risk to the patient. CLINICAL FEATURES: An obese, 18-yr-old parturient with a fetus in the breech position underwent Cesarean delivery at 35 weeks gestation secondary to evolving preeclampsia. Unfortunately, no neurovascular imaging of this patient's spine was available. The patient underwent an attempted external cephalic version, a failed obstetric induction, and, ultimately, a Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. The resulting infant was without any stigmata of KTS. Both mother and infant did well during the course of their hospitalization, and were discharged home without incident. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior cutaneous hemangiomas of KTS may be associated with underlying epidural and subdural vascular malformations. Disruption of these vascular anomalies during regional anesthesia may lead to neuraxial hematoma formation, which may be further compounded by a consumptive coagulopathy observed in some cases of KTS. If neuraxial vascular anomalies cannot be ruled out radiographically, regional anesthesia should be avoided. Additionally, regardless of the anesthetic technique chosen, the coagulation profile of these patients should be verified for signs of coagulopathy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Classic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean section.

We report a case of an otherwise healthy neonate diagnosed at birth with a classic metaphyseal lesion of the proximal tibia following external cephalic version for frank breech presentation and a subsequent urgent cesarean section. Although the classic metaphyseal lesion is considered highly specific for infant abuse, this case demonstrates the importance of obtaining a history of obstetric trauma for neonates presenting to the imaging department for suspected non-accidental injury.

Adult↗