PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “randomized crossover trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial compared a six week course of oral prednisolone tapering from 60 mg to 10 mg daily with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 2.0 g/kg given over one to two days for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Twenty-four of the thirty-two randomized patients completed both treatment periods. Both treatments produced significant improvements in the primary outcome measure, change in an 11-point disability scale two weeks after randomization. There was slightly, but not significantly, more improvement after IVIg than with prednisolone, the mean difference between the groups in change in disability grade being 0.16 (95% CI = -0.35 to 0.66). There were also slightly, but not significantly, greater improvements favoring IVIg in the secondary outcome measures: time to walk 10 meters after two weeks and improvement in disability grade after six weeks. Results may have been biased against IVIg by the eight patients who did not complete the second arm of the trial. A serious adverse event (psychosis) attributable to treatment occurred in one patient while on prednisolone and in none with IVIg.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1983

Progabide: a controlled trial in partial epilepsy.

Progabide (SL 76002) was studied in a randomized double-blind crossover trial using 20 outpatients suffering from partial complex seizures. Progabide was added to the concomitant antiepileptic treatment in a fixed dosage schedule. The design included an open therapy control unit. No significant difference was established between the number of partial seizures during treatment with progabide and placebo. A trend was observed for lower seizure frequency of secondary generalized seizures during treatment with progabide. Only mild and transient side effects were observed. There was no difference between the side effects of progabide and placebo.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2002

Azathioprine in severe adult atopic dermatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a limited range of treatments for severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Azathioprine has often been used but there has been no randomized controlled trial of this drug to confirm its efficacy in AD. OBJECTIVES: To establish or refute the efficacy of azathioprine in severe AD. To investigate the safety and tolerability of azathioprine in this patient population. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of azathioprine in adult patients with severe AD. Each treatment period was of 3 months' duration. Treatments were azathioprine 2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1) and matched placebo. Disease activity was monitored using the SASSAD sign score. In addition, severity of pruritus, sleep disturbance and disruption of work/daytime activity were monitored using visual analogue scales. Adverse events were recorded and haematological and biochemical monitoring was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects were enrolled, mean age 38 years (range 17-73). Sixteen were withdrawn, 12 during azathioprine treatment and four during placebo treatment. The SASSAD score fell by 26% during treatment with azathioprine vs. 3% on placebo (P < 0.01). Pruritus, sleep disturbance and disruption of work/daytime activity all improved significantly on active treatment but not on placebo. The difference in mean improvement between azathioprine and placebo was significant for disruption of work/daytime activity (P < 0.02) but not for pruritus or sleep disturbance. Gastrointestinal disturbances were reported by 14 patients during azathioprine treatment and four were withdrawn as a result of severe nausea and vomiting. Leukopenia was observed in two patients and deranged liver enzymes in eight during treatment with azathioprine. CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine is an effective and useful drug in severe AD although it is not always well-tolerated. Monitoring of the full blood count and liver enzymes is advisable during treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

[Comparative clinical study of Neopanpur and Creon].

The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of Neopanpur (EGIS) and Creon (Kalichemie) in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Fifteen patients were examined for 2 x 10 days. A period: Neopanpur 3 x 2, B period: Creon 10,000 3 x 2. The type of the trial was: randomized, open, crossover study. The complaints of the patients (in score), the characters of the stool (daily weight, fat content, foamy, smell), amylum tolerance test (ATT), H2-breath test, lipjodol-test, Lundh-test and Schilling-test were determined before and during the treatment periods. Both enzyme preparations could effectively decrease the anamnestic complaints, the stool frequency and characteristics together with the laboratory results of pancreatic functions. There is no clinically significant difference between the clinical efficacy of Creon and Neopanpur. Both enzyme preparations can be applied in the treatment of maldigestion in patients with chronic pancreatic insufficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Design and implementation of the Dual Site Atrial Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation (DAPPAF) clinical trial. DAPPAF Phase 1 Investigators.

The Dual Site Atrial Pacing to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation (DAPPAF) study compares dual site, single site and support pacing modalities in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with a history of paroxysmal AF (PAF) and a bradyarrhythmic indication for pacing. The trial is a randomized crossover comparison of dual site atrial pacing, single site atrial pacing, and a support pacing control period (DDI at 50 ppm or VDI) done in six month intervals. Patient inclusion requires at least 2 documented AF episodes in the three months prior to enrollment. The patients can be on concurrent antiarrhythmic drug regimens but this regimen must remain constant throughout the protocol. Patients with AV nodal ablation are excluded from this study. The primary endpoints of the study compare the time to first recurrence of clinically significant symptomatic AF with ECG verification, and quality of life among the three treatment modes. Secondary endpoints include time to first recurrence of all AF episodes as monitored by the pacemaker, the measurement of echocardiographic parameters, and symptoms logged by the patients. This trial was designed after pilot studies showed dual site pacing to be safe, feasible and preliminary results suggested increased maintenance of sinus rhythm with atrial pacing.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Randomized double-blind, double-dummy crossover clinical trial of oral tramadol versus rectal tramadol administration in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain.

Tramadol is commonly used as second step drug of the analgesic ladder. In circumstances where the oral route is unavailable, rectal administration of opioids might be a simple alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic activity and tolerability of tramadol by oral and rectal administration in a double-blind, double-dummy crossover trial. The study included 60 cancer patients with cancer pain no longer responsive to non-opioid drugs. Each patient initially received oral tramadol 50 mg (drops), followed by tramadol sustained release 100 mg orally, and placebo rectally, or tramadol 100 mg rectally and placebo orally, twice a day, in a randomized sequence, on each of 3 days. Patients were allowed to take 50 mg of oral tramadol by drops as needed (four doses per day, to a maximum of 400 mg/day, including the basal dose given by the oral or rectal route). Pain intensity and relief and symptom scores were recorded every day and at the end of each phase of the crossover. The mean age of the patients was 66.1 years (SD 13.5 years); 36 were female, and 44 completed both periods. Patients dropped out due to adverse effects (15 patients) and refusal (1 patient). No differences in the use of rescue dose of oral tramadol were observed between the groups. No differences in pain intensity and relief scores, or in other symptoms between the two treatments were observed. No differences in treatment efficacy as judged by the clinician (P=0.73), in patient compliance (P=0.35), or in patient satisfaction regarding treatment (P<0.35) were found. No differences in adverse effects were found between the two treatments (25.5%, 13 patients, and 20.4%, 11 patients, with oral and rectal treatment, respectively). The proportion of preferences favored oral administration for both physicians (P=0.0002) and patients (P=0.002). Rectal administration of tramadol appears a reliable, noninvasive alternative method of pain control for patients no longer responsive to non-opioid analgesics, unable to take oral tramadol.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Experimental study of double-lumen, two-stage endotracheal tube during conventional mechanical ventilation in rabbits.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a double-lumen, two-stage endotracheal tube on gas exchanges (ventilatory efficiency) during conventional mechanical ventilation, using a ventilator in rabbits. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, crossover laboratory animal trial. SETTING: Research laboratory in the Beijing Children's Hospital. SUBJECTS: Five adult New Zealand rabbits, weighing 3.2 to 3.7 kg. INTERVENTIONS: A new type of endotracheal tube-the double-lumen two-stage endotracheal tube-was designed and tested for ventilation efficiency in rabbits with normal and injured lungs. The new tube (size 3.0 mm) was made out of two Portex endotracheal tubes (size 3.0 mm) by adhering two vertical cross-sections at the distal end of the two tubes. The new tube and a conventional endotracheal tube of the same size (inner diameter 3.0 mm) were randomly used in pressure control ventilation. Each trial was maintained for 30 mins. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Effects from the two endotracheal tubes on pulmonary mechanics, hemodynamics, and gas exchange were observed. We measured peak inspiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), intrinsic PEEP, mean airway pressure, and arterial blood and mixed expired gas variables (Pao2, Paco2, pH, and mixed expired gas Pco2). The new endotracheal tube acutely increased CO2 elimination in all animals with normal and injured lungs. Paco2 decreased from 46 +/- 4 to 36 +/- 5 torr (6.1 +/- 0.5 to 4.8 +/- 0.7 kPa; p < .01) in normal lungs and from 48 +/- 5 to 36 +/- 5 (6.4 +/- 0.7 to 4.8 +/- 0.7 kPa; p < .01). Meanwhile, tidal volume fraction decreased from 0.48 +/- 0.07 to 0.35 +/- 0.05 (p < .01) and from 0.56 +/- 0.07 to 0.40 +/- 0.07 (p < .01) in normal and injured lungs, respectively. Intrinsic PEEP of the new tube slightly increased, but there were no significant differences in comparison with the conventional tube. CONCLUSION: Compared with the conventional endotracheal tube, the new double-lumen, two-stage endotracheal tube reduced Paco2 by decreasing anatomical deadspace in rabbits with normal and injured lungs under pressure control ventilation, thus enhancing ventilatory efficiency and reducing ventilator-induced injury.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

A randomized, controlled trial of high-dose dextromethorphan in facial neuralgias.

BACKGROUND: NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists such as ketamine and dextromethorphan reduce pain in certain neuropathic pain conditions. However, there have been no controlled trials of NMDA antagonists in facial neuralgias. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, crossover trial compared 6 weeks of oral dextromethorphan with active placebo (low-dose lorazepam) in 19 patients, stratified into three groups: 11 with facial pain and possible trigeminal neuropathy, five with anesthesia dolorosa, and three with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Dosage was titrated in each patient to the highest level reached without disrupting normal activities. RESULTS: Patients completing the trial included 10 with possible trigeminal neuropathy, four with anesthesia dolorosa, and two with trigeminal neuralgia. In patients with possible trigeminal neuropathy and anesthesia dolorosa, dextromethorphan decreased pain by a mean of only 2 to 4%, and these estimates were not significant. Both patients with trigeminal neuralgia had more pain during dextromethorphan treatment than during placebo treatment. Of three patients who demonstrated an analgesic response to dextromethorphan during the main trial, only one repeatedly responded in four subsequent confirmatory drug-placebo crossovers. CONCLUSIONS: Dextromethorphan shows little or no analgesic efficacy in pain due to possible trigeminal neuropathy and anesthesia dolorosa. Additional trials are necessary to conclusively evaluate the efficacy of NMDA-receptor antagonists in trigeminal neuralgia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy and convenience of pen devices for insulin injection have improved quality of life for patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (DM). Prefilled, disposable pens have the advantage of simplicity, with minimal training and attention required and no installation of new cartridges necessary. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess patient preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen (FlexPen) and conventional vial/syringe injection method for insulin injection therapy among patients with DM. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study, patients with type 1 or 2 DM were transferred from previous QD or BID conventional insulin therapy to a mixture of 70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart injection (NovoLog Mix 7030) for 4 weeks of dose optimization using their usual type of syringe. Patients were then randomly assigned to use either vial/syringe or a prefilled, disposable pen to inject the biphasic insulin aspart 7030 mixture for the next 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of use of the other injection device. Efficacy, safety profiles, and patient preference for the delivery systems were compared. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.0 [12.4] years; age range, 28-81 years; mean [SD] body mass index, 31 [5.5] kg/m(2)) were enrolled. One hundred three patients completed the study. Seventy-four percent of patients (78105) indicated a preference for the pen over the vial/syringe method (95% CI, 71%-87%), compared with 20% (21105) who preferred the vial/syringe. Eighty-five percent (88104) considered the pen more discreet for use in public (compared with 9% [9104] for the vial/syringe), 74% (77104) considered it easier to use overall (compared with 21% [22104] for the vial/syringe), and 85% (89105) found the insulin dose scale on the pen easier to read (compared with 10% [10105] for the vial/syringe). Patients had statistically significant improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin values during the study (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in fasting plasma glucose, mean 4-point blood glucose profiles, or serum fructosamine values were found between groups. Overall, the safety profiles during treatment periods with the pen were comparable to those with the vial/syringe. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, differences in efficacy and safety profiles between the vial/syringe and prefilled, disposable pen appeared negligible. However, more patients expressed a preference to continue use of the pen.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Neuroendocrine responses to single oral doses of remoxipride and sulpiride in healthy female and male volunteers.

Six female and six male healthy volunteers received 100 mg remoxipride, 200 mg sulpiride and placebo as single oral doses in a double blind trial with a randomized crossover design. The main objective was to compare the effect of the two drugs on serum prolactin levels, but effects on other hormones were also investigated. Remoxipride and sulpiride increased the serum levels of prolactin to similar peak levels. This effect was larger in female than in male subjects. Sulpiride increased prolactin levels at much lower plasma concentrations than remoxipride, and sulpiride's effect on prolactin lasted for considerably longer than remoxipride's. No consistent effects on serum levels of LH, FSH, GH, oestradiol, progesterone, testosterone or cortisol could be detected after remoxipride and sulpiride compared to placebo. No drug-related effects on plasma homovanillic acid (HVA) were found.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Oral hypertonic glucose solution in the treatment of infantile colic.

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective treatment of infantile colic (IC) has not yet been determined. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the efficiency of 30% glucose solution in the treatment of IC. METHODS: A total of 25 infants diagnosed as typical IC were given 1 mL of 30% glucose solution or sterile water for 4 days consecutively, in a randomized, double blind crossover trial. The effect was measured by parents' scoring. RESULTS: Parents reported varying degrees of improvement in 16 infants (64%) given glucose solution, and in 12 infants (48%) given placebo. Comparison of treatment modalities were statistically significant (P = 0.031). There was no side-effect during treatments. CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that 30% glucose was effective in the treatment of IC. Since oral glucose solution is natural, safe, cheap and easily achievable, it might be considered as an alternative therapy.

Colic↗
PubMed2000

Randomized, cross-over, controlled comparison of two inactivated hepatitis A vaccines.

The immunogenicity, tolerability and interchangeability of two hepatitis A vaccines, Vaqta (Merck and Co.) and Havrix (SmithKline) were studied in a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial. Vaccine was administered to 201 volunteers at 0 and 26 weeks in one of four vaccine regimens: Havrix-Havrix; Havrix-Vaqta; Vaqta-Havrix or Vaqta-Vaqta. Seroconversion rates (>/=10 mIU/ml) for those whose first dose was Vaqta or Havrix, respectively, were: 41/96 (43%) versus 30/95 (32%) (P=0.15) at 2 weeks and 91/98 (93%) versus 84/97 (87%) (P=0.43) at 4 weeks, and 100% at 26 weeks. Geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of total antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) for Vaqta and Havrix were 189 and 114 mIU/ml (P=0.011) at 4 weeks and 234 and 136 mIU/ml (P<0.001) at 26 weeks. At 30 weeks, the GMC after two doses of Havrix was 2612 mIU/ml compared with 5497 after two doses of Vaqta (P<0.001). The GMC in the Havrix-Vaqta group was 5672 mIU/ml compared with 3077 mIU/ml in the Vaqta-Havrix group (P<0.001). Less than half of vaccine recipients reported tenderness or pain. In this study, seroconversion rates of the two vaccines were similar. Vaqta produces significantly higher anti-HAV antibody than Havrix. Crossover immunization is well tolerated and results in high antibody concentrations, especially when Vaqta is the booster dose. The significance of higher anti-HAV antibody concentrations in terms of long-term protection is unknown.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Administration of folinic acid after low dose methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Folinic acid (leucovorin) supplementation has been suggested as a possible means of treating the short term side effects that occur with low dose methotrexate (MTX). However, it has not been established whether leucovorin will abrogate the antiarthritic effect of MTX. We entered 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with MTX into a 48 week randomized, double blind, crossover trial of folinic acid vs placebo. The dose of folinic acid was equal to the dose of MTX and it was given orally 4 h following the single, weekly MTX administration. Under these conditions, leucovorin did not decrease the therapeutic effect of MTX. While the incidence of stomatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity were lower during leucovorin treatment, our study lacked sufficient power to establish a statistically significant difference.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

[Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin: effect of injection time on postprandial glycemia.

BACKGROUND: [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin (lispro) is an insulin analogue with a reduced capacity for self-association and faster absorption from subcutaneous injection sites. We hypothesized that administration of lispro closer to a meal would result in better glucose control than that achieved with regular insulin. METHODS: This trial used a randomized crossover design that consisted of a period of metabolic stabilization lasting 9 days followed by an evaluation period lasting 5 days. The patients received weight-maintenance diets, and insulin doses were adjusted as needed. Calorie intake, insulin dose, and activities were kept constant once the evaluation period began. During the evaluation period, we varied the time between insulin injection and mealtime and assessed glucose control. RESULTS: During the evaluation period, the lowest mean glucose concentrations were 117.9 mg/dl for lispro and 119.8 mg/dl (p = 0.817) for regular insulin. To obtain these, we gave lispro, on average, 22.5 minutes before meals and regular insulin 63.8 minutes before meals (p = 0.006). A similar pattern was evident throughout the glucose control parameters. The exception was mean amplitude of glucose excursion, which was lower after lispro (59 versus 75 mg/dl; p = 0.007) compared with regular insulin. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved equal or slightly better glucose control, as reflected by mean amplitude of glucose excursion, with insulin lispro given much closer to meal time than that achieved with regular insulin. As a result of these findings, we propose that a rapidly absorbed analogue of insulin is capable of achieving better control of postprandial glucose at a more convenient injection time.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Quality of life in hypertensives treated with atenolol or captopril: a double-blind crossover trial.

AIM: To compare the effects of captopril and atenolol on quality of life of hypertensive patients. METHODS: In a randomly allocated double-blind crossover trial with two 6-week treatment periods captopril at 25 mg twice a day or atenolol at 50 mg once a day were administered to 265 hypertensive patients (mean age 56 years; 55% men). Of these, 65% were newly treated hypertensives and 35% were previously uncontrolled on a diuretic alone. A seated diastolic blood pressure of 95-115 mmHg was required after a 3-week placebo run-in period. Any previous diuretic therapy was changed to hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg once a day) and the dose was kept constant throughout the trial. Newly diagnosed patients did not take a diuretic at any time. Quality of life was assessed from self-completed questionnaires measuring psychological well-being, symptomatic side effects of treatment, and activity and perceived well-being (a health index). A relative's perception of the patients' mood was also obtained where possible. RESULTS: Twelve patients withdrew on atenolol and 10 on captopril. No differences between the drugs were observed in quality of life measures, and 95% confidence intervals suggested that important differences were excluded. CONCLUSION: We conclude that at the doses used in this trial there were no important differences between captopril and atenolol in their effects on quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Controlled comparison of I.M. morphine and buprenorphine for analgesia after abdominal surgery.

In a double-blind randomized non-crossover trial 47 patients received either morphine or buprenorphine by regular i.m. injection for 24 h after abdominal surgery. The two drugs were equally effective as analgesics at the doses used. Five in the buprenorphine group and none in the morphine group were excluded because of respiratory depression. Four of these had received opiates during operation. The remainder of the buprenorphine group developed progressively slower respiration rates after 12 h. The results indicate that buprenorphine has a synergistic respiratory depressant effect with fentanyl and phenoperidine and may have a cumulative effect when given regularly on a 6-hourly regimen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1986

The effect of ranitidine and cimetidine on imipramine disposition.

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of imipramine were studied after a single, oral, 100 mg dose was taken by 12 healthy male subjects following 3 days of pretreatment with placebo, cimetidine (300 mg every 6 h), and ranitidine (150 mg every 12 h) in a randomized, double blind, crossover trial. After each imipramine dose plasma samples were collected for 72 h and assayed for imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxyimipramine and 2-hydroxydesipramine by HPLC. Cimetidine preadministration statistically prolonged imipramine t 1/2 compared to ranitidine (22.7 vs. 13.0 h) or placebo (10.8 h). Mean imipramine area under the curve (AUC) following cimetidine pretreatment was more than double that following placebo (2.633 vs. 0.966 micrograms X h X ml-1) or ranitidine (1.14 micrograms X h X ml-1) pretreatment. Imipramine apparent oral clearance was reduced in all 12 subjects after cimetidine. Compared to ranitidine or placebo, cimetidine pretreatment was associated with an increased imipramine/desipramine AUC ratio, suggesting cimetidine-induced impairment of demethylation of imipramine. Ranitidine was not observed to alter imipramine pharmacokinetics.

Administration, Oral↗